The Problem of Massovization of Dystopia as a Genre of Art in the Risk Society

S. Simonova, N. Garshin, V. Alikhanova
{"title":"The Problem of Massovization of Dystopia as a Genre of Art in the Risk Society","authors":"S. Simonova, N. Garshin, V. Alikhanova","doi":"10.17759/langt.2021080305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of this article is the problem of transformation and massization of the genre of dystopia and its loss of its essential features. The hypothesis of the study is the existence of a close relationship between the processes of massizing art and the popularization of dystopia in modern mass culture and public consciousness. The authors draw attention to the role of dystopia in modern society, which can be characterized as a risk society, as well as to the influence of dystopias on the consciousness of the masses. The main methodological technique is functional analysis. In addition, dialectics, the principle of historicism and comparative analysis are applied. The result of the study is the provision that in modern society there is an emphasis on the process of massization of art, during which the border between elite and mass culture becomes much less obvious. In addition, the study clarifies the role of literary works in spreading risks and the requirement of moral, and possibly legal responsibility for such acts. The key conclusion is the provision according to which, in the conditions of blurring the boundaries between elite and mass art, dystopia is becoming a popular genre and has an impact on social reality.","PeriodicalId":414200,"journal":{"name":"Язык и текст","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Язык и текст","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/langt.2021080305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of this article is the problem of transformation and massization of the genre of dystopia and its loss of its essential features. The hypothesis of the study is the existence of a close relationship between the processes of massizing art and the popularization of dystopia in modern mass culture and public consciousness. The authors draw attention to the role of dystopia in modern society, which can be characterized as a risk society, as well as to the influence of dystopias on the consciousness of the masses. The main methodological technique is functional analysis. In addition, dialectics, the principle of historicism and comparative analysis are applied. The result of the study is the provision that in modern society there is an emphasis on the process of massization of art, during which the border between elite and mass culture becomes much less obvious. In addition, the study clarifies the role of literary works in spreading risks and the requirement of moral, and possibly legal responsibility for such acts. The key conclusion is the provision according to which, in the conditions of blurring the boundaries between elite and mass art, dystopia is becoming a popular genre and has an impact on social reality.
风险社会中反乌托邦艺术类型的大众化问题
本文的问题是反乌托邦类型的转型和规模化问题及其本质特征的丧失。本研究的假设是艺术大众化的过程与现代大众文化和公众意识中反乌托邦的普及之间存在着密切的关系。作者注意到反乌托邦在现代社会中的作用,这可以被描述为一个风险社会,以及反乌托邦对大众意识的影响。主要的方法技术是功能分析。此外,还运用了辩证法、历史决定论原则和比较分析法。研究结果表明,现代社会强调艺术大众化的过程,在此过程中,精英文化和大众文化之间的界限变得不那么明显。此外,该研究还澄清了文学作品在传播风险中的作用,以及对这种行为的道德和可能的法律责任的要求。关键结论是,在精英艺术与大众艺术界限模糊的条件下,反乌托邦正在成为一种流行的流派,并对社会现实产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信