Oral Health Needs Assessment of Geriatrics Living in Mansoura Center

Sheta Barsoum, S. Hegazy, N. Attia
{"title":"Oral Health Needs Assessment of Geriatrics Living in Mansoura Center","authors":"Sheta Barsoum, S. Hegazy, N. Attia","doi":"10.21608/mjd.2021.223400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The quality of life is highly linked to the oral health in elderly people. This study was performed to assess differences in oral health needs using normative and sociodental approaches among geriatric patients in Mansoura city. Materials and Methods: This study was of descriptive cross-sectional design based on close ended questionnaires and interviews in addition to the clinical examinations of both past caries experience and periodontal disease state of the patients. Five hundred healthy participants aged ≥ 60 of both genders were randomly selected from urban and rural areas in Mansoura city. Results: Only 2% of the sample had oral lesions and just 2.8% showed root caries. On the other hand 86.8% had periodontitis, 58.8% had decayed teeth, 99.2% had filled teeth, and 65.8% had missed teeth. Impact related needs of the studied population showed that the highest percentage 23.4%, 23.2% significantly reported their teeth as average and good respectively, while the lowest percentage 4%, 7.2% significantly described their teeth as excellent and very poor. Regarding gums the highest percentage 32.8%, 25.4% significantly labeled their gums as average and good respectively, while the lowest percentage 0.6%, 5.2% significantly defined their gums as excellent and very poor. Also, the mean impact of physical domain was 1.73 ± 0.64, psychological domain was 1.56 ± 0.83 and social domain was 1.40 ± 0.57 which indicated that the most participants did not have problems. In Propensity related needs 36.4% did not clean their teeth, and 27% cleaned once a day and 59.2% used toothbrush with toothpaste. Results showed 64.6% did not smoke cigarettes, and 78% did not smoke sheesha. Conclusion: The elderly population in urban and rural areas in Mansoura center had low mean impact related needs regarding the three domains. There is an urgent need to persuade people to adopt preventive therapy while also seeking medical interventions to enhance the retention of natural teeth into advanced age. Provision of oral health care to older people will not only lead to economic savings but will also reduce the burden of the caregivers.","PeriodicalId":308616,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2021.223400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The quality of life is highly linked to the oral health in elderly people. This study was performed to assess differences in oral health needs using normative and sociodental approaches among geriatric patients in Mansoura city. Materials and Methods: This study was of descriptive cross-sectional design based on close ended questionnaires and interviews in addition to the clinical examinations of both past caries experience and periodontal disease state of the patients. Five hundred healthy participants aged ≥ 60 of both genders were randomly selected from urban and rural areas in Mansoura city. Results: Only 2% of the sample had oral lesions and just 2.8% showed root caries. On the other hand 86.8% had periodontitis, 58.8% had decayed teeth, 99.2% had filled teeth, and 65.8% had missed teeth. Impact related needs of the studied population showed that the highest percentage 23.4%, 23.2% significantly reported their teeth as average and good respectively, while the lowest percentage 4%, 7.2% significantly described their teeth as excellent and very poor. Regarding gums the highest percentage 32.8%, 25.4% significantly labeled their gums as average and good respectively, while the lowest percentage 0.6%, 5.2% significantly defined their gums as excellent and very poor. Also, the mean impact of physical domain was 1.73 ± 0.64, psychological domain was 1.56 ± 0.83 and social domain was 1.40 ± 0.57 which indicated that the most participants did not have problems. In Propensity related needs 36.4% did not clean their teeth, and 27% cleaned once a day and 59.2% used toothbrush with toothpaste. Results showed 64.6% did not smoke cigarettes, and 78% did not smoke sheesha. Conclusion: The elderly population in urban and rural areas in Mansoura center had low mean impact related needs regarding the three domains. There is an urgent need to persuade people to adopt preventive therapy while also seeking medical interventions to enhance the retention of natural teeth into advanced age. Provision of oral health care to older people will not only lead to economic savings but will also reduce the burden of the caregivers.
曼苏拉中心老年患者口腔健康需求评估
目的:老年人的口腔健康与生活质量密切相关。本研究旨在评估曼苏拉市老年患者在口腔健康需求方面的差异,采用规范和社会方法。材料和方法:本研究采用描述性横断面设计,采用封闭式问卷调查和访谈,并对患者既往龋齿经历和牙周病状况进行临床检查。从曼苏拉市的城市和农村地区随机抽取500名年龄≥60岁的男女健康参与者。结果:只有2%的样本有口腔病变,只有2.8%的样本有牙根龋。牙周炎占86.8%,蛀牙占58.8%,补牙占99.2%,缺牙占65.8%。受调查人群的影响相关需求显示,最高比例(23.4%)和23.2%(23.2%)分别表示自己的牙齿为“一般”和“良好”,而最低比例(4%)和7.2%(7.2%)表示自己的牙齿为“优秀”和“非常差”。在牙龈方面,最高比例的32.8%和25.4%的人分别将自己的牙龈标记为“一般”和“良好”,而最低比例的0.6%和5.2%的人将自己的牙龈标记为“优秀”和“非常差”。生理领域的平均影响为1.73±0.64,心理领域的平均影响为1.56±0.83,社会领域的平均影响为1.40±0.57,表明大多数参与者没有问题。在倾向相关需求中,36.4%的人不刷牙,27%的人每天刷牙一次,59.2%的人使用牙刷和牙膏。结果显示,64.6%的人不吸烟,78%的人不吸烟。结论:曼苏拉中心城区和农村老年人口在这三个领域的平均影响相关需求较低。迫切需要说服人们采取预防治疗,同时寻求医疗干预措施,以加强自然牙齿的保留,直到老年。向老年人提供口腔保健不仅会节省经济,而且还会减轻照顾者的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信