The Sumgait Massacres: Concerning Their Characteristics and Definitions

G. Hovhannisyan
{"title":"The Sumgait Massacres: Concerning Their Characteristics and Definitions","authors":"G. Hovhannisyan","doi":"10.51442/ijags.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper concerns one of the first displays of ethnic violence in the recent history of the USSR that took place in the city of Sumgait in the Azerbaijanian SSR in February 1988 and was the start of violence of an anti-Armenian nature. It is a study of contemporary perceptions, definitions and terminology. Arising from this object, this paper examines the following questions: ● What were Armenian perceptions and characteristics of the Sumgait massacres and the factors that governed their conditions ● What definitions and perceptions were merited as a result of the Sumgait massacres by the Azerbaijanian side ● How were the Sumgait massacres evaluated by the international public and the USSR leadership ● What were the scientific definitions of the terms given to the Sumgait massacres and their characteristics. Research has been carried out on the basis of specialist literature, archival materials, witness statements, contemporary periodical press etc. Descriptions, analyses, narrative analyses and comparative methods were also utilised in this study. As a result of the research carried out, the conclusion was reached that the February 1988 massacres of the Armenian population of the Azerbaijanian city of Sumgait by the participants, various political circles and structures, conditioned by several factors, merited different appraisals. On the Armenian side, they were immediately linked, in the collective Armenian consciousness, to the Armenian Genocide realised in the 20th century within the Ottoman Empire. The central authorities, arising out of Soviet national policy principles, interpreted the event as “mass unrest.” In its euphemistic definitions, the Azerbaijani side attempted to “neutralise” the ethnically based violence used against a part of the population. The “Armenian intrigue and treachery” theory, as a “legal” explanation of the violence, aims to justify the crimes committed and evade any responsibility for them. The international public saw the Sumgait massacres in an ethnic context, stressing the laudable, necessary measures taken by the central authorities to prevent and stop them.","PeriodicalId":200042,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51442/ijags.0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper concerns one of the first displays of ethnic violence in the recent history of the USSR that took place in the city of Sumgait in the Azerbaijanian SSR in February 1988 and was the start of violence of an anti-Armenian nature. It is a study of contemporary perceptions, definitions and terminology. Arising from this object, this paper examines the following questions: ● What were Armenian perceptions and characteristics of the Sumgait massacres and the factors that governed their conditions ● What definitions and perceptions were merited as a result of the Sumgait massacres by the Azerbaijanian side ● How were the Sumgait massacres evaluated by the international public and the USSR leadership ● What were the scientific definitions of the terms given to the Sumgait massacres and their characteristics. Research has been carried out on the basis of specialist literature, archival materials, witness statements, contemporary periodical press etc. Descriptions, analyses, narrative analyses and comparative methods were also utilised in this study. As a result of the research carried out, the conclusion was reached that the February 1988 massacres of the Armenian population of the Azerbaijanian city of Sumgait by the participants, various political circles and structures, conditioned by several factors, merited different appraisals. On the Armenian side, they were immediately linked, in the collective Armenian consciousness, to the Armenian Genocide realised in the 20th century within the Ottoman Empire. The central authorities, arising out of Soviet national policy principles, interpreted the event as “mass unrest.” In its euphemistic definitions, the Azerbaijani side attempted to “neutralise” the ethnically based violence used against a part of the population. The “Armenian intrigue and treachery” theory, as a “legal” explanation of the violence, aims to justify the crimes committed and evade any responsibility for them. The international public saw the Sumgait massacres in an ethnic context, stressing the laudable, necessary measures taken by the central authorities to prevent and stop them.
苏格特大屠杀:关于其特征和定义
本文涉及1988年2月发生在阿塞拜疆苏维埃社会主义共和国苏姆盖特市的苏联近代史上最早的种族暴力事件之一,这是反亚美尼亚性质暴力的开始。它是对当代观念、定义和术语的研究。从这个目标出发,本文考察了以下问题:●亚美尼亚人对苏姆盖特大屠杀的看法和特点是什么,以及决定其条件的因素是什么●阿塞拜疆方面对苏姆盖特大屠杀的定义和看法是什么●国际公众和苏联领导人如何评价苏姆盖特大屠杀●苏姆盖特大屠杀及其特点的术语的科学定义是什么?研究依据专业文献、档案资料、证人证言、当代期刊报刊等。本研究还采用了描述法、分析法、叙事分析法和比较法。根据所进行的研究,得出的结论是,1988年2月在阿塞拜疆苏姆盖特市发生的由参与者、各种政治圈子和结构所造成的亚美尼亚人大屠杀,受到若干因素的制约,值得作出不同的评价。在亚美尼亚方面,在亚美尼亚人的集体意识中,他们立即与20世纪奥斯曼帝国境内发生的亚美尼亚种族灭绝联系在一起。出于苏联的国家政策原则,中央当局将这一事件解释为“大规模骚乱”。在其委婉的定义中,阿塞拜疆方面试图“消除”对一部分人口使用的基于种族的暴力。“亚美尼亚阴谋和背信弃义”理论作为对暴力的“法律”解释,旨在为所犯下的罪行辩护,并逃避任何责任。国际公众在种族背景下看待苏姆盖特大屠杀,强调中央当局为防止和制止屠杀而采取的值得赞扬的必要措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信