The Impact of Distance, Cardinal-direction and Time on Solar Irradiance Estimation: A Case-study

Lennard Visser, Stef Knibbeler, T. Alskaif, W. V. van Sark
{"title":"The Impact of Distance, Cardinal-direction and Time on Solar Irradiance Estimation: A Case-study","authors":"Lennard Visser, Stef Knibbeler, T. Alskaif, W. V. van Sark","doi":"10.1109/SEST48500.2020.9203214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long term Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI) data sets are essential to assess the local solar resource and estimate the potential power production of photovoltaic systems. Statistical models are found to be very effective in estimating the GHI. In this study we examine to what extent the performance of such models is affected by the distance, direction and temporal difference between the training and testing period. To quantify these factors three machine learning models are considered: Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Artificial Neural Network. These models estimate the GHI at 15 weather stations in the Netherlands by considering 11 meteorological variables. The paper demonstrates that GHI estimation is more accurate when the model is trained on a station that is located closer to the target station, where an increased error of 3% and 7% is found up to a distance of respectively 40 and 120 km. In addition, in the case study it is found that the accuracy of GHI estimation improves when the test station is located in a northeast, east, southeast or south direction from the training station. This partly correlates with the prevailing wind direction. Finally, the testing period selected is found to significantly affect the obtained model performance, whereas the influence of the training period is found to be minimal.","PeriodicalId":302157,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST)","volume":"399 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEST48500.2020.9203214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Long term Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI) data sets are essential to assess the local solar resource and estimate the potential power production of photovoltaic systems. Statistical models are found to be very effective in estimating the GHI. In this study we examine to what extent the performance of such models is affected by the distance, direction and temporal difference between the training and testing period. To quantify these factors three machine learning models are considered: Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and Artificial Neural Network. These models estimate the GHI at 15 weather stations in the Netherlands by considering 11 meteorological variables. The paper demonstrates that GHI estimation is more accurate when the model is trained on a station that is located closer to the target station, where an increased error of 3% and 7% is found up to a distance of respectively 40 and 120 km. In addition, in the case study it is found that the accuracy of GHI estimation improves when the test station is located in a northeast, east, southeast or south direction from the training station. This partly correlates with the prevailing wind direction. Finally, the testing period selected is found to significantly affect the obtained model performance, whereas the influence of the training period is found to be minimal.
距离、基数方向和时间对太阳辐照度估算的影响:一个实例研究
长期全球水平辐照度(GHI)数据集对于评估当地太阳能资源和估计光伏系统的潜在发电量至关重要。统计模型在估计GHI方面是非常有效的。在本研究中,我们考察了这些模型的性能在多大程度上受到训练和测试期间的距离、方向和时间差异的影响。为了量化这些因素,我们考虑了三种机器学习模型:随机森林、极端梯度增强和人工神经网络。这些模式通过考虑11个气象变量估算荷兰15个气象站的GHI。本文表明,在距离目标站较近的站点上训练模型,GHI估计更加准确,在距离目标站40 km和距离目标站120 km时,误差分别增加3%和7%。此外,在案例研究中发现,当测试站位于训练站的东北、东、东南或南方向时,GHI估计的精度有所提高。这部分与盛行风向有关。最后,发现所选择的测试周期对得到的模型性能有显著影响,而训练周期的影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信