{"title":"Evolution of war. Issues of variability or invariance of Nature and Character of War","authors":"Kakhaber Chapodze","doi":"10.33674/220199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of the nature and character of the war has probably been the\nsubject of research since the first organized clash between the two opposing\ngroups. My purpose in this paper is to elaborate on specific aspects\nof evolution of nature and character of war. First, based on the analysis\nof different theories of study of war and warfare, which includes\nexamination of how warfare has evolved over a long history, analyzing\nimportant issues related to evolution of war, consider different considerations\nspecifically what was and is the catalyst for changes in the character of war\nvs. unchanging nature of war. It is important to analyze the evolution of\nwarfare, regard to revolutions in military affairs and the analysis of four\ngenerations of war. Revolutions in the military affairs have analyzed the issue\nin three directions: technological development, doctrinal innovations, and\norga-nizational adaptations, which have been an essential process in light\nof developments taking place in chronological order throughout the world.\nFour Generations War Analysis is catalysts for change to understand the real\ndrivers of the generational shift. The discussion of the fourth generation\nof war leads to the important issue what we today call the dilemmas posed by\nmodern warfare, which brought war into the abstract dimension. Military\ntheorists such as Martin van Creveld, Mary Kaldor, and Max Boot, have\nanalyzed and saw the nature and character of war from a new prism, but to\nthis day abstract nature of war “fog of war” remain unexplained, unresolved\nissue for modern military theorist","PeriodicalId":256788,"journal":{"name":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ante Portas - Studia nad bezpieczeństwem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33674/220199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study of the nature and character of the war has probably been the
subject of research since the first organized clash between the two opposing
groups. My purpose in this paper is to elaborate on specific aspects
of evolution of nature and character of war. First, based on the analysis
of different theories of study of war and warfare, which includes
examination of how warfare has evolved over a long history, analyzing
important issues related to evolution of war, consider different considerations
specifically what was and is the catalyst for changes in the character of war
vs. unchanging nature of war. It is important to analyze the evolution of
warfare, regard to revolutions in military affairs and the analysis of four
generations of war. Revolutions in the military affairs have analyzed the issue
in three directions: technological development, doctrinal innovations, and
orga-nizational adaptations, which have been an essential process in light
of developments taking place in chronological order throughout the world.
Four Generations War Analysis is catalysts for change to understand the real
drivers of the generational shift. The discussion of the fourth generation
of war leads to the important issue what we today call the dilemmas posed by
modern warfare, which brought war into the abstract dimension. Military
theorists such as Martin van Creveld, Mary Kaldor, and Max Boot, have
analyzed and saw the nature and character of war from a new prism, but to
this day abstract nature of war “fog of war” remain unexplained, unresolved
issue for modern military theorist