Disclosure, Discrimination, and Identity among Working Professionals with Bipolar Disorder or Major Depression

M. Elliott, Jordan C. Reuter
{"title":"Disclosure, Discrimination, and Identity among Working Professionals with Bipolar Disorder or Major Depression","authors":"M. Elliott, Jordan C. Reuter","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter presents the results of an analysis of in-depth interviews with a snowball sample of 45 people who identified as working professionals diagnosed with bipolar disorder or major depression. It explores three dimensions of their experience: disclosure versus concealment of their diagnosis on the job, exposure to discrimination in the workplace based on their mental illness diagnosis, and identity strategies they used to manage the status inconsistency between being a professional and having a mental illness diagnosis. The findings reveal how people learn to calculate when it is safe to disclose their diagnosis on the job, especially after experiencing discriminatory treatment such as being fired or demoted. They also indicate that applying for workplace modifications to accommodate symptoms of mental illness may be met with unprofessional and unsupportive reactions on the part of managers, Human Resources professionals, and coworkers, which could explain in part why so few participants in this sample sought them. When it comes to balancing inconsistent statuses, the findings demonstrate how people distance themselves from their mental illness identity in favor of the more prized status of working professional as a means of self-preservation. The chapter concludes with a call for sweeping changes in workplace culture to minimize fear and shame and maximize inclusion of people diagnosed with mental illness, allowing them to flourish in careers in which they may realize their full potential.","PeriodicalId":127198,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Disability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190093167.013.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This chapter presents the results of an analysis of in-depth interviews with a snowball sample of 45 people who identified as working professionals diagnosed with bipolar disorder or major depression. It explores three dimensions of their experience: disclosure versus concealment of their diagnosis on the job, exposure to discrimination in the workplace based on their mental illness diagnosis, and identity strategies they used to manage the status inconsistency between being a professional and having a mental illness diagnosis. The findings reveal how people learn to calculate when it is safe to disclose their diagnosis on the job, especially after experiencing discriminatory treatment such as being fired or demoted. They also indicate that applying for workplace modifications to accommodate symptoms of mental illness may be met with unprofessional and unsupportive reactions on the part of managers, Human Resources professionals, and coworkers, which could explain in part why so few participants in this sample sought them. When it comes to balancing inconsistent statuses, the findings demonstrate how people distance themselves from their mental illness identity in favor of the more prized status of working professional as a means of self-preservation. The chapter concludes with a call for sweeping changes in workplace culture to minimize fear and shame and maximize inclusion of people diagnosed with mental illness, allowing them to flourish in careers in which they may realize their full potential.
双相情感障碍或重度抑郁症工作人员的披露、歧视和认同
本章介绍了对45名被诊断为双相情感障碍或重度抑郁症的工作专业人士的雪球样本进行深入访谈的分析结果。它探讨了他们经历的三个方面:在工作中披露与隐瞒他们的诊断,在工作场所因他们的精神疾病诊断而受到的歧视,以及他们用来管理专业人士和精神疾病诊断之间身份不一致的身份策略。研究结果揭示了人们如何学会计算何时在工作中披露自己的诊断是安全的,尤其是在经历了被解雇或降职等歧视性待遇之后。他们还指出,为了适应精神疾病的症状而申请改变工作场所,可能会遇到来自经理、人力资源专业人士和同事的不专业和不支持的反应,这可以部分解释为什么这个样本中很少有参与者寻求他们。当涉及到平衡不一致的状态时,研究结果表明,人们如何与自己的精神疾病身份保持距离,以支持更有价值的职业地位,作为一种自我保护的手段。这一章最后呼吁彻底改变工作场所文化,最大限度地减少恐惧和羞耻,最大限度地包容被诊断患有精神疾病的人,让他们在职业生涯中茁壮成长,充分发挥自己的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信