Formalism and Phenomenology in Vasily Sesemann’s Aesthetics

Dalius Jonkus
{"title":"Formalism and Phenomenology in Vasily Sesemann’s Aesthetics","authors":"Dalius Jonkus","doi":"10.12797/9788381383936.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to analyze the connection between formalism and phenomenology in Vasily Sesemann’s aesthetics. In the articles “Aesthetic valuation in the history of art” (1922), “The nature of poetic image” (1925), “Art and culture” (1927), Seseman discusses the formalist concept of art. However, the most complete critique of the formalist idea of art is revealed in his Aesthetics (1970). In this book, he presented the most comprehensive conception of aesthetic structure. In this paper, I set out first to analyze the most important features of the formalist history of art, and then to explore how Sesemann transforms the concept of artistic form into a conception of aesthetic structure. I argue that formalistic analysis of art transforms the concept of artistic form into a style. This style is nothing less than the experience of being in the world. Sesemann abandons the dualistic separation of sensory material and intelligible form, and instead offers the concept of aesthetic structure. He reveals the relationship between the sensory structure of an aesthetic object and the perceiving subject. Aesthetic value can be revealed as meaningful only with the participation of a subject and with the necessary contemplative attitude. Analysis of art must cover not only individual structures of the object, but also a phenomenological analysis of perception. The combination of formalism and phenomenology is a peculiar characteristic of Sesemann’s aesthetics. The structural analysis reveals a systematic coherence among the artistic creator, work of art, and its perceiver.","PeriodicalId":105988,"journal":{"name":"Roman Ingarden and Our Times: Recent Trends in Phenomenology and Contemporary Philosophy","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roman Ingarden and Our Times: Recent Trends in Phenomenology and Contemporary Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12797/9788381383936.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the connection between formalism and phenomenology in Vasily Sesemann’s aesthetics. In the articles “Aesthetic valuation in the history of art” (1922), “The nature of poetic image” (1925), “Art and culture” (1927), Seseman discusses the formalist concept of art. However, the most complete critique of the formalist idea of art is revealed in his Aesthetics (1970). In this book, he presented the most comprehensive conception of aesthetic structure. In this paper, I set out first to analyze the most important features of the formalist history of art, and then to explore how Sesemann transforms the concept of artistic form into a conception of aesthetic structure. I argue that formalistic analysis of art transforms the concept of artistic form into a style. This style is nothing less than the experience of being in the world. Sesemann abandons the dualistic separation of sensory material and intelligible form, and instead offers the concept of aesthetic structure. He reveals the relationship between the sensory structure of an aesthetic object and the perceiving subject. Aesthetic value can be revealed as meaningful only with the participation of a subject and with the necessary contemplative attitude. Analysis of art must cover not only individual structures of the object, but also a phenomenological analysis of perception. The combination of formalism and phenomenology is a peculiar characteristic of Sesemann’s aesthetics. The structural analysis reveals a systematic coherence among the artistic creator, work of art, and its perceiver.
赛赛曼美学中的形式主义与现象学
本文的目的是分析形式主义与现象学在瓦西里·赛赛曼美学中的联系。在《艺术史上的审美价值》(1922年)、《诗性意象的本质》(1925年)、《艺术与文化》(1927年)等文章中,塞斯曼论述了形式主义的艺术观念。然而,对形式主义艺术观念的最完整的批判是在他的《美学》(1970)中揭示的。在这本书中,他提出了最全面的美学结构概念。在本文中,我首先分析了形式主义艺术史的最重要特征,然后探讨了赛赛曼如何将艺术形式的概念转化为审美结构的概念。我认为形式主义的艺术分析将艺术形式的概念转化为一种风格。这种风格不外乎是生活在这个世界上的体验。赛赛曼抛弃了感官材料与可理解形式的二元分离,提出了审美结构的概念。他揭示了审美对象的感官结构与感知主体之间的关系。审美价值只有在主体的参与和必要的沉思态度下才能显现出来。对艺术的分析不仅要涵盖对象的个体结构,还要涵盖感知的现象学分析。形式主义与现象学的结合是赛赛曼美学的独特特征。结构分析揭示了艺术创作者、艺术作品及其感知者之间的系统一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信