ANALYSIS OF CLASICAL TEST THEORY (CTT) APPROCH ON ACADEMIC ABILITY TEST INSTRUMENT

D. Pratama
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF CLASICAL TEST THEORY (CTT) APPROCH ON ACADEMIC ABILITY TEST INSTRUMENT","authors":"D. Pratama","doi":"10.21009/jisae.052.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study to estimate the parameters in Clasical Test Theory (CTT) approach on Academic Ability Test Instrument new students of IAIN Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung academic year 2018/2019. Data was collected through documentation techniques in the form of 425 sheets of student test answers. Based on the results of data analysis, it is known that the index of difficulty level in all problem fields has not shown a balance of comparison of easy, medium and difficult questions. The average questions are distributed in the medium category questions with a percentage of 25% easy questions, 51% medium questions, and 24% difficult questions. Distinguishing power index, in all question areas shows there are 37% of questions that are able to distinguish test takers 'abilities and as many as 18% questions are not able to distinguish test takers' abilities. While the effectiveness of distractors there are 239 or 79.6% functioning and there are 61 or 20.3% of the non-functioning distractors. The results of the validity analysis of 100 questions obtained 54% which have a coefficient of validity more than 1.59 and as many as 46% that have a coefficient value less than 1.59. For the overall reliability coefficient, a value of 0.81 is obtained. This means that 80% of the difference in scores obtained by test takers with others is their pure score difference or is not influenced by other factors as a source of error in the measurement. \n Keywords: clasical theory test, test instruments.","PeriodicalId":262250,"journal":{"name":"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.052.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study to estimate the parameters in Clasical Test Theory (CTT) approach on Academic Ability Test Instrument new students of IAIN Syaikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung academic year 2018/2019. Data was collected through documentation techniques in the form of 425 sheets of student test answers. Based on the results of data analysis, it is known that the index of difficulty level in all problem fields has not shown a balance of comparison of easy, medium and difficult questions. The average questions are distributed in the medium category questions with a percentage of 25% easy questions, 51% medium questions, and 24% difficult questions. Distinguishing power index, in all question areas shows there are 37% of questions that are able to distinguish test takers 'abilities and as many as 18% questions are not able to distinguish test takers' abilities. While the effectiveness of distractors there are 239 or 79.6% functioning and there are 61 or 20.3% of the non-functioning distractors. The results of the validity analysis of 100 questions obtained 54% which have a coefficient of validity more than 1.59 and as many as 46% that have a coefficient value less than 1.59. For the overall reliability coefficient, a value of 0.81 is obtained. This means that 80% of the difference in scores obtained by test takers with others is their pure score difference or is not influenced by other factors as a source of error in the measurement.  Keywords: clasical theory test, test instruments.
经典测试理论(ctt)方法在学业能力测试仪器中的应用分析
本研究的目的是估计经典测试理论(CTT)方法在2018/2019学年IAIN saikh Abdurrahman Siddik Bangka Belitung新生学业能力测试仪器中的参数。数据通过文档技术收集,以425张学生考试答案的形式收集。根据数据分析的结果可知,各问题领域的难度指数并没有呈现出易、中、难问题比较的平衡。平均问题分布在中等类别问题中,其中25%是简单问题,51%是中等问题,24%是困难问题。区分能力指数,在所有问题区域中,有37%的问题能够区分考生的能力,多达18%的问题无法区分考生的能力。而有效的干扰物有239个(79.6%)起作用,无功能的干扰物有61个(20.3%)。对100个问题的效度分析结果显示,效度系数大于1.59的占54%,小于1.59的占46%。总体可靠度系数为0.81。这意味着考生与其他人的分数差异的80%是他们的纯粹分数差异,或者不受其他因素的影响,作为测量误差的来源。关键词:经典理论测试;测试仪器;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信