Effect of Dietary Probiotic and/or Prebiotic Supplementation on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Some Serum Biochemical Alterations in Broiler Chicken -

M. Soltan
{"title":"Effect of Dietary Probiotic and/or Prebiotic Supplementation on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Some Serum Biochemical Alterations in Broiler Chicken -","authors":"M. Soltan","doi":"10.5455/JASA.20151118110619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A feeding trial was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation of prebiotic (mannan oligosaccharide, MOS), Probiotic (Lactobacilli spp.) and their combination (symbiotic) on growth performance, some carcass traits and some blood serum biochemical alterations in broilers. Two hundred, one day-old broiler chicks (Cobb) were randomly assigned to 4 dietary treatments (50 chicks/treatment) for 6 weeks. Treatment groups were as follow: 1. Basal diet (control); 2. Basal diet plus Mannan-Oligosaccharide (MOS) (0.5g of MOS/kg diet); 3. Basal diet plus probiotic (0.25g/kg diet and 4. Basal diet plus the combination of pre and probiotics (synbiotic). Statistical analysis of the obtained data indicated that prebiotic plus probiotic supplementation increased (P≤0.05) final body weight by about 15.1%, 9.5% and 7.3% when compared with control and chicks group fed on basal diet supplemented with prebiotic or prebiotic plus probiotic respectively. It was observed that prebiotic or probiotic supplementation improved total gain, feed conversion ratio, protein efficiency ratio and efficiency of energy utilization throughout the whole experimental period by about (5.0%, 2.7%, 1.96% and 2.2) and (7.4%, 6.9%, 6.7% and 6.4) respectively when compared with the control. On the other hand, combination of prebiotic and probiotic showed better results of the tested parameters when compared with the control or with prebiotic or probiotics alone supplemented chick groups. Moreover, it was noticed that both prebiotic and probiotic alone or combined supplementation reduced blood serum cholesterol, triglyceride, phospholipids and LDL concentrations and improved HDL concentration when compared with non-supplemented group. However, prebiotic (MOS containing product) significantly (P≤0.05) improved kidney function through reduction of blood serum uric acid concentration when compared with the control while probiotic (Lactobacili sp. containing product) and both prebiotic and probiotic combination had no significant effect. Prebiotic and/or probiotic supplementation improved phagocytic index, some immune organs relative weights, while had no clear effect on broiler carcass traits.","PeriodicalId":372944,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Science Advances","volume":"73 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Science Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JASA.20151118110619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

A feeding trial was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation of prebiotic (mannan oligosaccharide, MOS), Probiotic (Lactobacilli spp.) and their combination (symbiotic) on growth performance, some carcass traits and some blood serum biochemical alterations in broilers. Two hundred, one day-old broiler chicks (Cobb) were randomly assigned to 4 dietary treatments (50 chicks/treatment) for 6 weeks. Treatment groups were as follow: 1. Basal diet (control); 2. Basal diet plus Mannan-Oligosaccharide (MOS) (0.5g of MOS/kg diet); 3. Basal diet plus probiotic (0.25g/kg diet and 4. Basal diet plus the combination of pre and probiotics (synbiotic). Statistical analysis of the obtained data indicated that prebiotic plus probiotic supplementation increased (P≤0.05) final body weight by about 15.1%, 9.5% and 7.3% when compared with control and chicks group fed on basal diet supplemented with prebiotic or prebiotic plus probiotic respectively. It was observed that prebiotic or probiotic supplementation improved total gain, feed conversion ratio, protein efficiency ratio and efficiency of energy utilization throughout the whole experimental period by about (5.0%, 2.7%, 1.96% and 2.2) and (7.4%, 6.9%, 6.7% and 6.4) respectively when compared with the control. On the other hand, combination of prebiotic and probiotic showed better results of the tested parameters when compared with the control or with prebiotic or probiotics alone supplemented chick groups. Moreover, it was noticed that both prebiotic and probiotic alone or combined supplementation reduced blood serum cholesterol, triglyceride, phospholipids and LDL concentrations and improved HDL concentration when compared with non-supplemented group. However, prebiotic (MOS containing product) significantly (P≤0.05) improved kidney function through reduction of blood serum uric acid concentration when compared with the control while probiotic (Lactobacili sp. containing product) and both prebiotic and probiotic combination had no significant effect. Prebiotic and/or probiotic supplementation improved phagocytic index, some immune organs relative weights, while had no clear effect on broiler carcass traits.
饲粮中添加益生菌和/或益生元对肉鸡生长性能、胴体性状及部分血清生化变化的影响
本试验旨在研究饲粮中添加益生元(甘露寡糖,MOS)和益生菌(乳酸菌属)及其组合(共生)对肉鸡生长性能、部分胴体性状和部分血清生化变化的影响。试验选用200只1日龄肉鸡(Cobb),随机分为4个饲粮处理(50只/处理),持续6周。各处理组分别为:1。基础日粮(对照组);2. 基础饲粮加甘露寡糖(0.5g /kg);3.基础日粮加益生菌(0.25g/kg日粮和4。基础日粮加上预益生菌和益生菌(合成)的组合。对所得数据进行统计分析表明,与基础饲粮中添加益生元和益生元加益生菌组相比,饲粮中添加益生元和益生元加益生菌组的末重分别提高了约15.1%、9.5%和7.3% (P≤0.05)。结果表明,与对照组相比,饲粮中添加益生元或益生菌可提高试验期总增重、饲料系数、蛋白质效率和能量利用效率,分别提高了5.0%、2.7%、1.96%和2.2和7.4%、6.9%、6.7%和6.4。另一方面,益生元与益生菌组合的试验参数优于对照组或单独添加益生元或益生菌的雏鸡组。此外,与未补充组相比,益生元和益生菌单独或联合补充均可降低血清胆固醇、甘油三酯、磷脂和LDL浓度,并提高HDL浓度。与对照组相比,益生元(含MOS产品)通过降低血清尿酸浓度显著改善肾功能(P≤0.05),而益生菌(含乳杆菌杆菌产品)、益生元及益生菌联合使用对肾功能无显著影响。添加益生元和/或益生菌可提高肉鸡的吞噬指数和部分免疫器官的相对重量,但对肉鸡胴体性状无明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信