Acquiring nominal gender by deaf learners and hearing adult second language learners of Dutch

Joanne van Emmerik, Jetske Klatter, R. Hout, I. V. D. Craats, J. Schepens
{"title":"Acquiring nominal gender by deaf learners and hearing adult second language learners of Dutch","authors":"Joanne van Emmerik, Jetske Klatter, R. Hout, I. V. D. Craats, J. Schepens","doi":"10.4172/2375-4427.1000111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the acquisition of Dutch gender by deaf Dutch adults and hearing adult Turkish and Moroccan L2 learners of Dutch is discussed. Although, in the Netherlands, gender acquisition has been studied amply in ethnic minority children and adolescents, research with regard to ethnic minority adults and deaf adults is limited. The analysis of gender data was part of a comprehensive investigation of (writing) skills in these groups. The data were collected via a (semi-) spontaneous language task in which learners were invited to compose The Frog Story on the computer. Discovering and acquiring the gender paradigm turned out to be hard for the learner groups we investigated. Singular common nouns in Dutch take the definite determiner de and neuter nouns the definite determiner het. The results showed that in all learner groups most learners over generalized the use of de to neuter nouns. The reverse, the use of het with common nouns, hardly occurred. With respect to gender acquisition no differences were found between the various learner groups. The outcomes suggest that, in the domain of gender, the acquisition process in deaf learners of Dutch is comparable to the process of acquisition in hearing adult L2 learners of Dutch, despite their different learner situations (late L1 vs. late L2) and, in case of the adult L2 learners, their typologically different first languages. The explanation seems to be passing general learning stages, in combination with the disbalance between the effort required to learn a covert nominal gender distinction and the absence of informative or communicative value in using the gender distinction properly. This disbalance seems to lead to stagnation or fossization in early stages, in all learner groups.","PeriodicalId":231062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4427.1000111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper the acquisition of Dutch gender by deaf Dutch adults and hearing adult Turkish and Moroccan L2 learners of Dutch is discussed. Although, in the Netherlands, gender acquisition has been studied amply in ethnic minority children and adolescents, research with regard to ethnic minority adults and deaf adults is limited. The analysis of gender data was part of a comprehensive investigation of (writing) skills in these groups. The data were collected via a (semi-) spontaneous language task in which learners were invited to compose The Frog Story on the computer. Discovering and acquiring the gender paradigm turned out to be hard for the learner groups we investigated. Singular common nouns in Dutch take the definite determiner de and neuter nouns the definite determiner het. The results showed that in all learner groups most learners over generalized the use of de to neuter nouns. The reverse, the use of het with common nouns, hardly occurred. With respect to gender acquisition no differences were found between the various learner groups. The outcomes suggest that, in the domain of gender, the acquisition process in deaf learners of Dutch is comparable to the process of acquisition in hearing adult L2 learners of Dutch, despite their different learner situations (late L1 vs. late L2) and, in case of the adult L2 learners, their typologically different first languages. The explanation seems to be passing general learning stages, in combination with the disbalance between the effort required to learn a covert nominal gender distinction and the absence of informative or communicative value in using the gender distinction properly. This disbalance seems to lead to stagnation or fossization in early stages, in all learner groups.
聋人与健全成人荷兰语第二语言学习者的名义性别习得
本文探讨了聋人荷兰语成人和健全的土耳其语和摩洛哥语成人二语学习者的荷兰语性别习得情况。虽然在荷兰,对少数民族儿童和青少年的性别习得进行了充分的研究,但对少数民族成年人和聋人成年人的研究是有限的。性别数据分析是对这些群体(写作)技能的全面调查的一部分。数据是通过一个(半)自发的语言任务收集的,在这个任务中,学习者被邀请在电脑上创作青蛙的故事。发现和获得性别范式对我们调查的学习者群体来说是困难的。荷兰语中单数普通名词用限定词de,中性名词用限定词het。结果表明,在所有的学习者群体中,大多数学习者都过度概括了从义到中性名词的使用。相反,het与普通名词连用的情况很少发生。在性别习得方面,不同的学习者群体之间没有发现差异。研究结果表明,在性别领域,聋人荷兰语学习者的习得过程与成年听力荷兰语学习者的习得过程相当,尽管他们的学习情况不同(L1晚期与L2晚期),而且成年L2学习者的第一语言类型不同。这种解释似乎是通过一般的学习阶段,再加上学习隐蔽的名义性别区分所需的努力与正确使用性别区分缺乏信息或交际价值之间的不平衡。在所有的学习者群体中,这种不平衡似乎导致了早期阶段的停滞或僵化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信