«Texas hold’em»: transition from the strategic stability matrix to the new framework of the world order

T. Arzamanova
{"title":"«Texas hold’em»: transition from the strategic stability matrix to the new framework of the world order","authors":"T. Arzamanova","doi":"10.31249/ape/2022.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pandemic of COVID-19 became the real catalyst of global changes, having had the strongest impact on all aspects of activity, from the relationship between individuals and between society and the state to the formation of a new world order. Global inequalities have increased, including the lack of equitable access to vaccines against COVID-19, which, with competing systems competing for reputational gain, acquire the status of hybrid weapons. With regard to the emerging world order, it can already be stated that it is distinctly asymmetric and difficult to predict: the basic characteristics are global uncertainty, a large number of new world actors, including off-system players, nonlinearity, randomness and fragmentation. The author suggests that the arms control agenda is gradually losing its defining character for international relations: the principle of strategic stability ceases to be the basis of the world order. The growing tension in relations between Russia and the West is taking place against the background of a Washington-inspired unified position of the «collective West» that Russia will have to deal with, at least in the short to medium term. The basis of this position is a bet on a large-scale deterrence of Russia with the possibility of maintaining a targeted dialogue on a limited range of issues.","PeriodicalId":190632,"journal":{"name":"Urgent Problems of Europe","volume":"179 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urgent Problems of Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31249/ape/2022.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pandemic of COVID-19 became the real catalyst of global changes, having had the strongest impact on all aspects of activity, from the relationship between individuals and between society and the state to the formation of a new world order. Global inequalities have increased, including the lack of equitable access to vaccines against COVID-19, which, with competing systems competing for reputational gain, acquire the status of hybrid weapons. With regard to the emerging world order, it can already be stated that it is distinctly asymmetric and difficult to predict: the basic characteristics are global uncertainty, a large number of new world actors, including off-system players, nonlinearity, randomness and fragmentation. The author suggests that the arms control agenda is gradually losing its defining character for international relations: the principle of strategic stability ceases to be the basis of the world order. The growing tension in relations between Russia and the West is taking place against the background of a Washington-inspired unified position of the «collective West» that Russia will have to deal with, at least in the short to medium term. The basis of this position is a bet on a large-scale deterrence of Russia with the possibility of maintaining a targeted dialogue on a limited range of issues.
《德州扑克》:从战略稳定矩阵到世界秩序新框架的过渡
COVID-19大流行成为全球变化的真正催化剂,对活动的各个方面产生了最强烈的影响,从个人之间的关系到社会与国家之间的关系,再到世界新秩序的形成。全球不平等现象加剧,包括缺乏公平获得COVID-19疫苗的机会,这些疫苗在相互竞争的系统争夺声誉利益的情况下,获得了混合武器的地位。关于正在形成的世界秩序,可以说它明显不对称且难以预测:其基本特征是全球不确定性、大量新的世界参与者(包括系统外参与者)、非线性、随机性和碎片化。作者认为,军备控制议程正在逐渐失去其对国际关系的决定性特征:战略稳定原则不再是世界秩序的基础。俄罗斯与西方之间日益紧张的关系是在华盛顿推动的“集体西方”统一立场的背景下发生的,俄罗斯至少在中短期内必须应对这种统一立场。这一立场的基础是押注于对俄罗斯的大规模威慑,并有可能在有限范围的问题上保持有针对性的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信