Does end-of-life ships research trends change in last three decades? A review for the future roadmap

Bisma Mannan, Md Jahir Rizvi, Y. Dai
{"title":"Does end-of-life ships research trends change in last three decades? A review for the future roadmap","authors":"Bisma Mannan, Md Jahir Rizvi, Y. Dai","doi":"10.1080/25725084.2023.2187603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ships play a vital role in international trade for optimising transportation costs and help in boosting the economy in a globalized world. Therefore, a plethora of research has already been available in the areas related to the design, production, and operations of ships. However, little progress has been made around end-of-life (EOL) ships. For recycling the EOL ships, the terms “shipbreaking” and “ship recycling” were used in past studies and most of the time these terms can be interchangeably used in different studies. Still, there is a contextual difference that is further discussed. This study compiled the different methods of shipbreaking and ship recycling and the key regulations that facilitate the handling of EOL ships. Furthermore, it assesses the research trends of EOL ships from 1991 to 2021 through a systematic review with bibliometric analysis using the database of Scopus. For the systematic review, the topmost relevant publications are evaluated, and the key findings are compiled to find out the overall status of their contributions to shipbreaking and ship recycling research. Gaps are identified, and future research directions are discovered that might serve as a roadmap for further research development on EOL ships.","PeriodicalId":261809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping","volume":"63 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2023.2187603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ships play a vital role in international trade for optimising transportation costs and help in boosting the economy in a globalized world. Therefore, a plethora of research has already been available in the areas related to the design, production, and operations of ships. However, little progress has been made around end-of-life (EOL) ships. For recycling the EOL ships, the terms “shipbreaking” and “ship recycling” were used in past studies and most of the time these terms can be interchangeably used in different studies. Still, there is a contextual difference that is further discussed. This study compiled the different methods of shipbreaking and ship recycling and the key regulations that facilitate the handling of EOL ships. Furthermore, it assesses the research trends of EOL ships from 1991 to 2021 through a systematic review with bibliometric analysis using the database of Scopus. For the systematic review, the topmost relevant publications are evaluated, and the key findings are compiled to find out the overall status of their contributions to shipbreaking and ship recycling research. Gaps are identified, and future research directions are discovered that might serve as a roadmap for further research development on EOL ships.
在过去的三十年里,报废船的研究趋势有变化吗?对未来路线图的回顾
在全球化的世界中,船舶在优化运输成本和促进经济发展方面发挥着至关重要的作用。因此,在与船舶的设计、生产和操作相关的领域已经有了大量的研究。然而,在报废(EOL)船舶方面进展甚微。对于EOL船舶的回收,在以往的研究中使用了“拆船”和“船舶回收”这两个术语,并且在大多数情况下,这两个术语可以在不同的研究中互换使用。不过,还有一个背景差异有待进一步讨论。本研究整理了拆船和拆船的不同方法,以及便于处理废旧船舶的关键法规。此外,利用Scopus数据库进行文献计量分析,对1991 - 2021年EOL船舶的研究趋势进行了系统评价。在系统综述中,对相关论文进行评价,并对主要发现进行整理,以了解其对拆船和船舶回收研究的总体贡献状况。确定了差距,并发现了未来的研究方向,可能作为EOL船舶进一步研究发展的路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信