{"title":"On team knowledge and common knowledge","authors":"G. Tidhar, L. Sonenberg, Anand Srinivasa Rao","doi":"10.1109/ICMAS.1998.699072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We report on an approach to defining knowledge in multi-agent systems that allows the knowledge of a structured group of agents (a team) to be more than just the knowledge from individual sub-teams. Teams are first class entities in our logic. A team may have a sub-team relationship with other teams. A team which has no sub-team relationships with other teams is considered to be an agent. We ascribe knowledge directly to teams. Relationships between team and sub-team knowledge are specified axiomatically. We show that the introduction of team knowledge in this setting yields a definition of common knowledge which is an interesting generalization of the well known definition of common knowledge provided by Halpern and Moses (1992). From a systems development perspective, the separation of knowledge from sub-team knowledge allows for both top-down and bottom-up specifications of team behavior in a single framework.","PeriodicalId":244857,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No.98EX160)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No.98EX160)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMAS.1998.699072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30
Abstract
We report on an approach to defining knowledge in multi-agent systems that allows the knowledge of a structured group of agents (a team) to be more than just the knowledge from individual sub-teams. Teams are first class entities in our logic. A team may have a sub-team relationship with other teams. A team which has no sub-team relationships with other teams is considered to be an agent. We ascribe knowledge directly to teams. Relationships between team and sub-team knowledge are specified axiomatically. We show that the introduction of team knowledge in this setting yields a definition of common knowledge which is an interesting generalization of the well known definition of common knowledge provided by Halpern and Moses (1992). From a systems development perspective, the separation of knowledge from sub-team knowledge allows for both top-down and bottom-up specifications of team behavior in a single framework.