Bone Marrow Karyotype, Flow Cytometry, and FISH Analysis: Essential Tests to Improve the Initial Diagnosis of Patients with Myeloid Malignancies

F. Naseri, Fatemeh Safari, H. Khoshnevis, Maryam Pilechian Langroudi, S. Hesami, Nazanin Taheri, Abbas Shakoori Farahani
{"title":"Bone Marrow Karyotype, Flow Cytometry, and FISH Analysis: Essential Tests to Improve the Initial Diagnosis of Patients with Myeloid Malignancies","authors":"F. Naseri, Fatemeh Safari, H. Khoshnevis, Maryam Pilechian Langroudi, S. Hesami, Nazanin Taheri, Abbas Shakoori Farahani","doi":"10.18502/ijml.v10i2.12947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Diagnosing hematologic malignancies requires implementing several tests. This study aims to evaluate the chromosomal changes in patients with myeloid disorders and compare the results of flow cytometry and cytogenetics with the initial diagnosis performed by the oncologist. \nMaterials and Methods: 115 patients with myeloid disorders, 57.2% males and 42.8% females with a mean age of 50.3 years, previously diagnosed by an oncologist based on the clinical features, complete blood count, and peripheral blood smear interpretations, were considered. Moreover, flow cytometry and cytogenetic analysis were implemented on the bone marrow samples. \nResults: Cytogenetic results showed that 30% of patients with myeloid disorders had abnormal karyotypes. 77% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, 65% of acute myeloid leukemia, and 30.7% of chronic myeloid leukaemia indices showed normal karyotypes, and the others resulted in common and uncommon abnormalities, including the translocation (13;17), 92, XXYY, and del (4q). Considering the flow cytometry and karyotype results, the improved diagnoses were made for 41 patients who had not been diagnosed initially. \nConclusion: This study showed that, in some cases, an initial diagnosis is inconsistent with the flow cytometry and karyotype analysis results. Also, the flow cytometry results may differ from the karyotype depending on the case. Therefore, combining the results obtained by the cytogenetic investigation, flow cytometry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and molecular testing is preferable to provide a comprehensive report for the appropriate disease diagnosis and prognosis.","PeriodicalId":183358,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Laboratory","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijml.v10i2.12947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: Diagnosing hematologic malignancies requires implementing several tests. This study aims to evaluate the chromosomal changes in patients with myeloid disorders and compare the results of flow cytometry and cytogenetics with the initial diagnosis performed by the oncologist. Materials and Methods: 115 patients with myeloid disorders, 57.2% males and 42.8% females with a mean age of 50.3 years, previously diagnosed by an oncologist based on the clinical features, complete blood count, and peripheral blood smear interpretations, were considered. Moreover, flow cytometry and cytogenetic analysis were implemented on the bone marrow samples. Results: Cytogenetic results showed that 30% of patients with myeloid disorders had abnormal karyotypes. 77% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes, 65% of acute myeloid leukemia, and 30.7% of chronic myeloid leukaemia indices showed normal karyotypes, and the others resulted in common and uncommon abnormalities, including the translocation (13;17), 92, XXYY, and del (4q). Considering the flow cytometry and karyotype results, the improved diagnoses were made for 41 patients who had not been diagnosed initially. Conclusion: This study showed that, in some cases, an initial diagnosis is inconsistent with the flow cytometry and karyotype analysis results. Also, the flow cytometry results may differ from the karyotype depending on the case. Therefore, combining the results obtained by the cytogenetic investigation, flow cytometry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and molecular testing is preferable to provide a comprehensive report for the appropriate disease diagnosis and prognosis.
骨髓核型、流式细胞术和FISH分析:提高髓系恶性肿瘤患者初始诊断的基本试验
背景和目的:诊断血液学恶性肿瘤需要实施多项检查。本研究旨在评估髓系疾病患者的染色体变化,并将流式细胞术和细胞遗传学的结果与肿瘤学家的初步诊断进行比较。材料和方法:115例髓系疾病患者,男性57.2%,女性42.8%,平均年龄50.3岁,既往经肿瘤科医生根据临床特征、全血细胞计数和外周血涂片解释诊断。骨髓标本行流式细胞术和细胞遗传学分析。结果:细胞遗传学结果显示,30%的髓系疾病患者存在异常核型。77%的骨髓增生异常综合征患者、65%的急性髓性白血病患者、30.7%的慢性髓性白血病患者指标核型正常,其余常见和不常见异常,包括易位(13;17)、92、XXYY和del (4q)。结合流式细胞术和核型检测结果,对41例初诊未确诊的患者进行了改进诊断。结论:本研究表明,在某些病例中,初始诊断与流式细胞术和核型分析结果不一致。此外,根据不同的病例,流式细胞术结果可能与核型不同。因此,结合细胞遗传学、流式细胞术、荧光原位杂交和分子检测的结果,更有利于提供一份全面的报告,为适当的疾病诊断和预后提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信