Ethical Concerns About the Use of Assistive Technologies

B. Elger
{"title":"Ethical Concerns About the Use of Assistive Technologies","authors":"B. Elger","doi":"10.1093/med/9780190459802.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uptake of possible beneficial assistive technology is presently hampered by ethical concerns. It is important to examine the ethical issues raised by distinct types of existing technologies in more detail than has been done previously to obtain a nuanced judgment as to whether public health authorities and healthcare personnel should inform patients and interested stakeholders about them, offer patients and their informal caregivers more choice concerning the use of available assistive technologies, or even actively recommend some of them. The present chapter will focus on four examples of assistive technologies that, despite having been available for some time and being relatively simple to use, are not widely implemented: memory aid technology, “smart dresser” devices designed to help dementia patients with getting dressed, GPS tracking devices, and sensors to monitor patients in their private homes such as an intelligent wireless sensor system for the rapid detection of health issues. The first two technologies are chosen as examples for “aid” technology where the risk of harm is very low compared to significant benefits for patients, caregivers, and society. The second two are chosen because of their ethically relevant characteristics of control: their aim is patient surveillance and monitoring. The ethical issues related to these technologies will be discussed and conclusions drawn on how to appropriately balance beneficence and respect for patient autonomy.","PeriodicalId":334181,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Assistive Technologies for Dementia","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Assistive Technologies for Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190459802.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uptake of possible beneficial assistive technology is presently hampered by ethical concerns. It is important to examine the ethical issues raised by distinct types of existing technologies in more detail than has been done previously to obtain a nuanced judgment as to whether public health authorities and healthcare personnel should inform patients and interested stakeholders about them, offer patients and their informal caregivers more choice concerning the use of available assistive technologies, or even actively recommend some of them. The present chapter will focus on four examples of assistive technologies that, despite having been available for some time and being relatively simple to use, are not widely implemented: memory aid technology, “smart dresser” devices designed to help dementia patients with getting dressed, GPS tracking devices, and sensors to monitor patients in their private homes such as an intelligent wireless sensor system for the rapid detection of health issues. The first two technologies are chosen as examples for “aid” technology where the risk of harm is very low compared to significant benefits for patients, caregivers, and society. The second two are chosen because of their ethically relevant characteristics of control: their aim is patient surveillance and monitoring. The ethical issues related to these technologies will be discussed and conclusions drawn on how to appropriately balance beneficence and respect for patient autonomy.
使用辅助技术的伦理问题
采用可能有益的辅助技术目前受到伦理问题的阻碍。重要的是,要比以前更详细地审查不同类型的现有技术所引起的伦理问题,以便就公共卫生当局和卫生保健人员是否应将这些问题告知患者和感兴趣的利益攸关方,是否应在使用现有辅助技术方面为患者及其非正式护理人员提供更多选择,或者甚至积极推荐其中一些技术作出细致入微的判断。本章将重点介绍四个辅助技术的例子,尽管这些辅助技术已经有一段时间了,使用起来也相对简单,但并没有得到广泛应用:记忆辅助技术、帮助痴呆症患者穿衣服的“智能梳妆台”设备、GPS跟踪设备和在私人家中监测患者的传感器,如用于快速检测健康问题的智能无线传感器系统。前两种技术被选为“援助”技术的例子,与对患者、护理人员和社会的显著益处相比,伤害的风险非常低。选择后两种方法是因为它们具有与控制相关的伦理特征:它们的目的是对患者进行监视和监测。与这些技术相关的伦理问题将被讨论,并得出结论,如何适当地平衡慈善和尊重病人的自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信