CREDIT INFORMATION SHARING AND PROFITABILITY OF BANKS IN KENYA

James Kimani
{"title":"CREDIT INFORMATION SHARING AND PROFITABILITY OF BANKS IN KENYA","authors":"James Kimani","doi":"10.47672/ajdikm.760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Credit information sharing cost positively influenced the profitability of banks in Kenya. The general objective of the study was to evaluate credit information sharing and profitability of banks in Kenya. \nMethodology: The paper used a desk study review methodology where relevant empirical literature was reviewed to identify main themes and to extract knowledge gaps. \nFindings: The study stablished that borrower’s credit history information had a positive influence on the profitability in Kenya. The study the respondents agreed that their banks collect information on the number of previous applications that a loan applicant has made, the bank collects information on the number of loans applied and declined, the bank asks for reasons that the loan applied was declined for all applicants, the bank asks loan applicants to indicate the discipline observed when repaying previous loans advanced, the bank asks clients to indicate if they have delayed in remitting their periodic loan repayment in the past, the banks collect more information about the loan applicants credit history from the CRB. \nRecommendations: The study recommended that while sharing information, the banks should do a cost benefit analysis to ascertain if the sharing of such information is material or not. It should pay its attention to the administrative costs that come with sharing information. This is because the cost of information sharing as seen from the study results have a negative and significant influence on performance \nPurpose: Credit information sharing cost positively influenced the profitability of banks in Kenya. The general objective of the study was to evaluate credit information sharing and profitability of banks in Kenya. \nMethodology: The paper used a desk study review methodology where relevant empirical literature was reviewed to identify main themes and to extract knowledge gaps. \nFindings: The study stablished that borrower’s credit history information had a positive influence on the profitability in Kenya. The study the respondents agreed that their banks collect information on the number of previous applications that a loan applicant has made, the bank collects information on the number of loans applied and declined, the bank asks for reasons that the loan applied was declined for all applicants, the bank asks loan applicants to indicate the discipline observed when repaying previous loans advanced, the bank asks clients to indicate if they have delayed in remitting their periodic loan repayment in the past, the banks collect more information about the loan applicants credit history from the CRB. \nRecommendations: The study recommended that while sharing information, the banks should do a cost benefit analysis to ascertain if the sharing of such information is material or not. It should pay its attention to the administrative costs that come with sharing information. This is because the cost of information sharing as seen from the study results have a negative and significant influence on performance","PeriodicalId":447725,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Data, Information and Knowledge Management","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Data, Information and Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajdikm.760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Credit information sharing cost positively influenced the profitability of banks in Kenya. The general objective of the study was to evaluate credit information sharing and profitability of banks in Kenya. Methodology: The paper used a desk study review methodology where relevant empirical literature was reviewed to identify main themes and to extract knowledge gaps. Findings: The study stablished that borrower’s credit history information had a positive influence on the profitability in Kenya. The study the respondents agreed that their banks collect information on the number of previous applications that a loan applicant has made, the bank collects information on the number of loans applied and declined, the bank asks for reasons that the loan applied was declined for all applicants, the bank asks loan applicants to indicate the discipline observed when repaying previous loans advanced, the bank asks clients to indicate if they have delayed in remitting their periodic loan repayment in the past, the banks collect more information about the loan applicants credit history from the CRB. Recommendations: The study recommended that while sharing information, the banks should do a cost benefit analysis to ascertain if the sharing of such information is material or not. It should pay its attention to the administrative costs that come with sharing information. This is because the cost of information sharing as seen from the study results have a negative and significant influence on performance Purpose: Credit information sharing cost positively influenced the profitability of banks in Kenya. The general objective of the study was to evaluate credit information sharing and profitability of banks in Kenya. Methodology: The paper used a desk study review methodology where relevant empirical literature was reviewed to identify main themes and to extract knowledge gaps. Findings: The study stablished that borrower’s credit history information had a positive influence on the profitability in Kenya. The study the respondents agreed that their banks collect information on the number of previous applications that a loan applicant has made, the bank collects information on the number of loans applied and declined, the bank asks for reasons that the loan applied was declined for all applicants, the bank asks loan applicants to indicate the discipline observed when repaying previous loans advanced, the bank asks clients to indicate if they have delayed in remitting their periodic loan repayment in the past, the banks collect more information about the loan applicants credit history from the CRB. Recommendations: The study recommended that while sharing information, the banks should do a cost benefit analysis to ascertain if the sharing of such information is material or not. It should pay its attention to the administrative costs that come with sharing information. This is because the cost of information sharing as seen from the study results have a negative and significant influence on performance
肯尼亚银行的信用信息共享和盈利能力
目的:信用信息共享成本正向影响肯尼亚银行的盈利能力。该研究的总体目标是评估肯尼亚银行的信贷信息共享和盈利能力。研究方法:本文采用桌面研究回顾方法,对相关的实证文献进行回顾,以确定主题并提取知识空白。研究发现:在肯尼亚,借款人的信用记录信息对盈利能力有积极的影响。在这项研究中,受访者同意他们的银行收集贷款申请人以前申请的数量的信息,银行收集申请和拒绝贷款的数量的信息,银行要求所有申请人的贷款申请被拒绝的原因,银行要求贷款申请人指出在偿还以前的贷款时遵守的纪律。银行要求客户说明他们过去是否曾延迟汇出他们的定期贷款偿还,银行收集更多关于贷款申请人信用历史的信息,从CRB。建议:该研究建议,在共享信息的同时,银行应该做一个成本效益分析,以确定这些信息的共享是否重要。它应该关注信息共享带来的管理成本。这是因为从研究结果来看,信息共享成本对绩效有负向且显著的影响目的:信用信息共享成本对肯尼亚银行的盈利能力有正向影响。该研究的总体目标是评估肯尼亚银行的信贷信息共享和盈利能力。研究方法:本文采用桌面研究回顾方法,对相关的实证文献进行回顾,以确定主题并提取知识空白。研究发现:在肯尼亚,借款人的信用记录信息对盈利能力有积极的影响。在这项研究中,受访者同意他们的银行收集贷款申请人以前申请的数量的信息,银行收集申请和拒绝贷款的数量的信息,银行要求所有申请人的贷款申请被拒绝的原因,银行要求贷款申请人指出在偿还以前的贷款时遵守的纪律。银行要求客户说明他们过去是否曾延迟汇出他们的定期贷款偿还,银行收集更多关于贷款申请人信用历史的信息,从CRB。建议:该研究建议,在共享信息的同时,银行应该做一个成本效益分析,以确定这些信息的共享是否重要。它应该关注信息共享带来的管理成本。这是因为从研究结果来看,信息共享成本对绩效有负向的显著影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信