A Longitudial Study of Private Warehouse Investment Strategies

J. Kohn, M. A. Mcginnis, John E. Spillan
{"title":"A Longitudial Study of Private Warehouse Investment Strategies","authors":"J. Kohn, M. A. Mcginnis, John E. Spillan","doi":"10.22237/JOTM/1254355620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION During the last decade of the 20th century, conventional purchasing and logistics functions expanded into a broader strategic approach to include materials and distribution management known as supply chain management (Tan, 2001). Warehousing, as part of this larger system, enables companies to store purchases, work-in-progress, and finished goods while simultaneously performing break bulk and assembly activities. The ability to complete these functions rapidly results in providing faster delivery and better customer service (Wisner, et al 2009). The consequence of this capability is the establishment of a competitive edge in the marketplace. Traditionally, manufacturers fabricated products for storage in warehouses and then sold from inventory. Several warehouses were required to maintain inventory levels of 60 to 90 days supply in order to meet productions needs, customer needs, and avert stock outs. Warehousing of the past appeared to be an inescapable cost center that functioned like a large stock-keeping unit (Coyle et al, 2003). According to De Koster (1998) strong global competition that has emerged caused warehousing to assume a considerably more important competitive role in delivering high quality customer service, in a timely fashion, and within budget allocations. Warehouses have been redesigned and automated for high speed, high throughput rate, and high productivity in order to shrink processing and inventory carrying costs. With the arrival of innovative management ideas such as just-in-time inventory control, strategic alliances, and integrated logistical supply chain thinking in the 1990s, the function of warehousing changed to facilitate the goals of a shorter cycle times, lower inventories, lower costs, and better customer service. At present, warehouses are less likely to be long-term storage facilities. They are more than likely to be high-speed technologically equipped facilities with greater attention focused on high levels of stock turnover and meeting customer service objectives. The contemporary approach to the movement of goods allows product to remain in a warehouse for only a few hours or days, at most (Nynke et al, 2002). Extra emphasis is now directed towards flow-through warehouses where products stay in the warehouse for a short period of time and then move on to their destination (Nynke et al, 2002). Another area of warehouse management that has become an important focus of supply chain management is financial performance. Stock and Lambert (2001) use a Strategic Profit Model, which highlights the importance of logistics/supply chain management as an important part of organizational financial performance. They show the impact of investments in inventory, warehouse assets, fixed and variable costs, and cost of goods sold on return on net worth. In this context, one of the management decision's that can affect a firm's financial performance is whether to use private or for-hire (public or contract) warehousing. Stock and Lambert's (2001) discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of these two warehousing strategies can be summarized as follows: private warehouses provide a.) higher levels of control, b.) flexibility of design, c.) opportunity to operate the facility to meet specific product and customer needs, d.) lower costs if utilization is high, e.) greater use of specialized human resources, and f.) tax benefits. However, private warehouses offer less flexibility to respond to fluctuations in demand and require substantial investment. Conversely, public (for-hire) warehousing can: a.) conserve capital, b.) provide flexibility in responding to changes in market demand, c.) avoid the risk of obsolescence of private facilities, d.) offer a wide range of specialized services, e.) provide tax advantages, and f.) enable a manufacturer to better manage its storage and handling costs. Disadvantages of public (for-hire) warehousing include communication problems, uneven availability of specialized services, and space availability problems during peak demand. …","PeriodicalId":242296,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Management","volume":"345 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22237/JOTM/1254355620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION During the last decade of the 20th century, conventional purchasing and logistics functions expanded into a broader strategic approach to include materials and distribution management known as supply chain management (Tan, 2001). Warehousing, as part of this larger system, enables companies to store purchases, work-in-progress, and finished goods while simultaneously performing break bulk and assembly activities. The ability to complete these functions rapidly results in providing faster delivery and better customer service (Wisner, et al 2009). The consequence of this capability is the establishment of a competitive edge in the marketplace. Traditionally, manufacturers fabricated products for storage in warehouses and then sold from inventory. Several warehouses were required to maintain inventory levels of 60 to 90 days supply in order to meet productions needs, customer needs, and avert stock outs. Warehousing of the past appeared to be an inescapable cost center that functioned like a large stock-keeping unit (Coyle et al, 2003). According to De Koster (1998) strong global competition that has emerged caused warehousing to assume a considerably more important competitive role in delivering high quality customer service, in a timely fashion, and within budget allocations. Warehouses have been redesigned and automated for high speed, high throughput rate, and high productivity in order to shrink processing and inventory carrying costs. With the arrival of innovative management ideas such as just-in-time inventory control, strategic alliances, and integrated logistical supply chain thinking in the 1990s, the function of warehousing changed to facilitate the goals of a shorter cycle times, lower inventories, lower costs, and better customer service. At present, warehouses are less likely to be long-term storage facilities. They are more than likely to be high-speed technologically equipped facilities with greater attention focused on high levels of stock turnover and meeting customer service objectives. The contemporary approach to the movement of goods allows product to remain in a warehouse for only a few hours or days, at most (Nynke et al, 2002). Extra emphasis is now directed towards flow-through warehouses where products stay in the warehouse for a short period of time and then move on to their destination (Nynke et al, 2002). Another area of warehouse management that has become an important focus of supply chain management is financial performance. Stock and Lambert (2001) use a Strategic Profit Model, which highlights the importance of logistics/supply chain management as an important part of organizational financial performance. They show the impact of investments in inventory, warehouse assets, fixed and variable costs, and cost of goods sold on return on net worth. In this context, one of the management decision's that can affect a firm's financial performance is whether to use private or for-hire (public or contract) warehousing. Stock and Lambert's (2001) discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of these two warehousing strategies can be summarized as follows: private warehouses provide a.) higher levels of control, b.) flexibility of design, c.) opportunity to operate the facility to meet specific product and customer needs, d.) lower costs if utilization is high, e.) greater use of specialized human resources, and f.) tax benefits. However, private warehouses offer less flexibility to respond to fluctuations in demand and require substantial investment. Conversely, public (for-hire) warehousing can: a.) conserve capital, b.) provide flexibility in responding to changes in market demand, c.) avoid the risk of obsolescence of private facilities, d.) offer a wide range of specialized services, e.) provide tax advantages, and f.) enable a manufacturer to better manage its storage and handling costs. Disadvantages of public (for-hire) warehousing include communication problems, uneven availability of specialized services, and space availability problems during peak demand. …
民营仓库投资策略的纵向研究
在20世纪的最后十年,传统的采购和物流功能扩展到更广泛的战略方法,包括材料和分销管理被称为供应链管理(谭,2001年)。仓储,作为这个更大系统的一部分,使公司能够存储采购,在制品和成品,同时进行散货和组装活动。快速完成这些功能的能力可以提供更快的交付和更好的客户服务(Wisner, et al . 2009)。这种能力的结果是在市场上建立竞争优势。传统上,制造商制造产品储存在仓库中,然后从库存中销售。几个仓库需要维持60至90天的库存水平,以满足生产需要、客户需要和避免缺货。过去的仓储似乎是一个不可避免的成本中心,其功能就像一个大型的库存单位(Coyle等人,2003)。根据De Koster(1998)的说法,强劲的全球竞争已经出现,导致仓储在提供高质量的客户服务方面承担了相当重要的竞争角色,及时,在预算分配范围内。仓库已经被重新设计和自动化,以实现高速、高吞吐率和高生产率,以减少加工和库存携带成本。随着20世纪90年代准时制库存控制、战略联盟、一体化物流供应链思维等创新管理理念的到来,仓储的功能发生了变化,以实现更短的周期时间、更低的库存、更低的成本和更好的客户服务的目标。目前,仓库不太可能是长期储存设施。它们很可能是配备高速技术设备的设施,更加注重高水平的库存周转和满足客户服务目标。当代的货物运输方法允许产品在仓库中最多停留几个小时或几天(Nynke et al, 2002)。现在特别强调的是流通仓库,产品在仓库中停留很短的时间,然后转移到目的地(Nynke et al, 2002)。仓库管理的另一个已成为供应链管理重要焦点的领域是财务绩效。Stock和Lambert(2001)使用战略盈利模型,强调了物流/供应链管理作为组织财务绩效的重要组成部分的重要性。它们显示了在库存、仓储资产、固定和可变成本以及销售商品成本方面的投资对净资产回报率的影响。在这种情况下,可以影响公司财务业绩的管理决策之一是是否使用私人或租用(公共或合同)仓储。Stock和Lambert(2001)对这两种仓储策略的优缺点的讨论可以总结如下:私人仓库提供a.)更高水平的控制,b.)设计的灵活性,c.)操作设施以满足特定产品和客户需求的机会,d.)如果利用率高,成本较低,e.)更多地使用专门的人力资源,f.)税收优惠。但是,私人仓库应对需求波动的灵活性较差,需要大量投资。相反,公共(租赁)仓储可以:a.)节省资金,b.)灵活应对市场需求的变化,c.)避免私人设施过时的风险,d.)提供广泛的专业服务,e.)提供税收优惠,f.)使制造商能够更好地管理其存储和处理成本。公共(租赁)仓储的缺点包括通信问题、专业服务的不均衡可用性以及高峰需求期间的空间可用性问题。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信