A Study of Customer Service Agent’s Pragmatic Identity Construction in Complaint Responses

Cheng Huang, Ping-Yu Liu
{"title":"A Study of Customer Service Agent’s Pragmatic Identity Construction in Complaint Responses","authors":"Cheng Huang, Ping-Yu Liu","doi":"10.30560/ilr.v4n3p89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Positioned within rapport management theory proposed by Spencer-Oatey, this article investigates the customer service agent’s pragmatic identity construction in complaint response calls. Drawing on data of 42 complaint handling recordings from the customer care center of a Chinese airline company, this study tries to address these three research questions: 1) What types of pragmatic identities do the customer service agents construct in complaint response calls? 2) How are these pragmatic identities constructed through rapport management strategies? 3) What interpersonal functions do these pragmatic identities perform? By adopting a qualitative research method, this study has found that the agents mainly construct three default identities and one deviational identity in complaint response calls by employing nine rapport management strategies from four rapport management domains. These different pragmatic identities mainly perform three kinds of interpersonal functions: support face needs, support sociality rights and obligations, and support interactional goals. The findings further validates the feasibility of rapport management theory in the study of identity construction, and provides new ideas for future study on pragmatic identity construction in institutional communications.","PeriodicalId":261061,"journal":{"name":"International Linguistics Research","volume":"103 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Linguistics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30560/ilr.v4n3p89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Positioned within rapport management theory proposed by Spencer-Oatey, this article investigates the customer service agent’s pragmatic identity construction in complaint response calls. Drawing on data of 42 complaint handling recordings from the customer care center of a Chinese airline company, this study tries to address these three research questions: 1) What types of pragmatic identities do the customer service agents construct in complaint response calls? 2) How are these pragmatic identities constructed through rapport management strategies? 3) What interpersonal functions do these pragmatic identities perform? By adopting a qualitative research method, this study has found that the agents mainly construct three default identities and one deviational identity in complaint response calls by employing nine rapport management strategies from four rapport management domains. These different pragmatic identities mainly perform three kinds of interpersonal functions: support face needs, support sociality rights and obligations, and support interactional goals. The findings further validates the feasibility of rapport management theory in the study of identity construction, and provides new ideas for future study on pragmatic identity construction in institutional communications.
客服座席在投诉回复中的语用认同建构研究
本文立足于Spencer-Oatey的融洽关系管理理论,研究了客服座席在投诉响应电话中的语用认同建构。本研究利用某航空公司客户服务中心的42份投诉处理录音数据,试图解决以下三个研究问题:1)客服座席在投诉响应电话中构建了哪些类型的语用认同?2)这些实用主义身份是如何通过关系管理策略构建的?3)这些语用认同有哪些人际功能?本研究采用质性研究方法,通过采用来自四个关系管理领域的九种关系管理策略,发现座席在投诉响应呼叫中主要构建了三种默认身份和一种偏离身份。这些不同的语用认同主要履行三种人际功能:支持面子需求、支持社会性权利义务、支持互动目标。研究结果进一步验证了融洽管理理论在认同建构研究中的可行性,为今后研究机构传播中的语用认同建构提供了新的思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信