Sitting And Standing Balance Assessment Tools In Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Gaikwad Stuti N, Harishchandre Maheshwari A, Prof. Dr. Ganvir Suvarna (PhD)
{"title":"Sitting And Standing Balance Assessment Tools In Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review","authors":"Gaikwad Stuti N, Harishchandre Maheshwari A, Prof. Dr. Ganvir Suvarna (PhD)","doi":"10.46858/vimsjpt.5106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The effectiveness of interventions depend on utility of a specific common set of clinical tools that has ability to assess important clinical outcomes. \nObjective: To identify clinical assessment tools for assessing unsupported sitting and standing balance in SCI population. \nMethods: PubMed access provided articles with key words “spinal cord injury,” and “balance assessment”. Studies describing measurement of balance in subjects with SCI, were included. \nResults: After thorough screening 9 articles showed : 3 clinical scales assessed sitting balance and seated postural control, 1 clinical scale assessed standing function, 4 scale assessed functional mobility, static and dynamic walking balance; one scale assessed risk of fall during walking and 3 sensor based tools were identified. \nConclusion: It was observed that majority studies showed assessment of standing and walking balance; and both clinical performance based and sensor based tools were used for balance assessment. \nKey words: balance assessment, spinal cord injury.","PeriodicalId":284305,"journal":{"name":"VIMS JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VIMS JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46858/vimsjpt.5106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of interventions depend on utility of a specific common set of clinical tools that has ability to assess important clinical outcomes. Objective: To identify clinical assessment tools for assessing unsupported sitting and standing balance in SCI population. Methods: PubMed access provided articles with key words “spinal cord injury,” and “balance assessment”. Studies describing measurement of balance in subjects with SCI, were included. Results: After thorough screening 9 articles showed : 3 clinical scales assessed sitting balance and seated postural control, 1 clinical scale assessed standing function, 4 scale assessed functional mobility, static and dynamic walking balance; one scale assessed risk of fall during walking and 3 sensor based tools were identified. Conclusion: It was observed that majority studies showed assessment of standing and walking balance; and both clinical performance based and sensor based tools were used for balance assessment. Key words: balance assessment, spinal cord injury.
脊髓损伤患者坐立平衡评估工具:系统综述
背景:干预措施的有效性取决于一组特定的通用临床工具的效用,这些工具有能力评估重要的临床结果。目的:确定评估脊髓损伤人群无支撑的坐立平衡的临床评估工具。方法:PubMed检索提供以“脊髓损伤”和“平衡评估”为关键词的文章。包括描述脊髓损伤受试者平衡测量的研究。结果:经过全面筛选,9篇文章显示:3份临床量表评估坐姿平衡和坐姿控制,1份临床量表评估站立功能,4份评估功能活动能力、静态和动态行走平衡;其中一个量表评估行走时跌倒的风险,并确定了3种基于传感器的工具。结论:观察到大多数研究显示了站立和行走平衡的评估;基于临床表现和基于传感器的工具均用于平衡评估。关键词:平衡评估;脊髓损伤;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信