{"title":"Organizational changes in the activity of enterprises in the context of urgent crisis management","authors":"O. Kuzmin, O. Yurynets, I. Prokopenko","doi":"10.23939/EEM2021.01.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eliminating or reducing the negative impact of crisis phenomena on the economic condition of an enterprise and ensuring its further effective development is closely related to the concept of organizational changes. On the one hand, urgent crisis management tools almost always cause such changes. On the other hand, crisis phenomena in the activities of a business entity lead to the need to introduce organizational changes. In this context, it is noted that it is important to diagnose such changes even before their practical implementation begins. This problem is especially relevant when it is necessary to introduce so-called large-scale changes in the context of crisis management. Any mistakes at the beginning most likely will lead to failure to achieve the set goals and to problems in the practical implementation of these changes. Consequently, based on the results of the conducted research, organizational changes in the activities of enterprises in the conditions of crisis management at the beginning are proposed to be diagnosed taking into account four areas that correspond to the PAEI-model of Adizes, well known in the theory and practice. At the same time, it provides for determining the market orientation of organizational changes (proactive nature of organizational changes); the social orientation of organizational changes (integrative nature of organizational changes); the impact of organizational changes on the enterprise administration system (complementary nature of organizational changes); the impact of organizational changes on the operating environment of the enterprise (functional nature of organizational changes). The article offers a method for diagnosing organizational changes in the activities of enterprises in the conditions of crisis management, based on the method of hierarchy analysis (Analytic Hierarchy Process – AHP) and provides for the implementation of such key stages: the formation of an expert group; determining the level of a hierarchical model for diagnosing organizational changes in the conditions of anti-crisis management; studying the essence and characteristics of the proposed organizational changes, so that then diagnose them taking into account the directions of proactive, integrative, functional and complementary nature, using matrices of pairwise comparisons; determining eigenvectors, as well as establishing their normalized values, applying the known geometric mean of the matrix lines; determining the consistency of expert opinions; forming conclusions and recommendations. The possibility of practical use of the proposed method of diagnosing organizational changes in the activities of enterprises in the context of crisis management is confirmed by relevant calculations on the example of several business entities in the Lviv region.","PeriodicalId":124764,"journal":{"name":"Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/EEM2021.01.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Eliminating or reducing the negative impact of crisis phenomena on the economic condition of an enterprise and ensuring its further effective development is closely related to the concept of organizational changes. On the one hand, urgent crisis management tools almost always cause such changes. On the other hand, crisis phenomena in the activities of a business entity lead to the need to introduce organizational changes. In this context, it is noted that it is important to diagnose such changes even before their practical implementation begins. This problem is especially relevant when it is necessary to introduce so-called large-scale changes in the context of crisis management. Any mistakes at the beginning most likely will lead to failure to achieve the set goals and to problems in the practical implementation of these changes. Consequently, based on the results of the conducted research, organizational changes in the activities of enterprises in the conditions of crisis management at the beginning are proposed to be diagnosed taking into account four areas that correspond to the PAEI-model of Adizes, well known in the theory and practice. At the same time, it provides for determining the market orientation of organizational changes (proactive nature of organizational changes); the social orientation of organizational changes (integrative nature of organizational changes); the impact of organizational changes on the enterprise administration system (complementary nature of organizational changes); the impact of organizational changes on the operating environment of the enterprise (functional nature of organizational changes). The article offers a method for diagnosing organizational changes in the activities of enterprises in the conditions of crisis management, based on the method of hierarchy analysis (Analytic Hierarchy Process – AHP) and provides for the implementation of such key stages: the formation of an expert group; determining the level of a hierarchical model for diagnosing organizational changes in the conditions of anti-crisis management; studying the essence and characteristics of the proposed organizational changes, so that then diagnose them taking into account the directions of proactive, integrative, functional and complementary nature, using matrices of pairwise comparisons; determining eigenvectors, as well as establishing their normalized values, applying the known geometric mean of the matrix lines; determining the consistency of expert opinions; forming conclusions and recommendations. The possibility of practical use of the proposed method of diagnosing organizational changes in the activities of enterprises in the context of crisis management is confirmed by relevant calculations on the example of several business entities in the Lviv region.
消除或减少危机现象对企业经济状况的负面影响,确保企业进一步有效发展,与组织变革的概念密切相关。一方面,紧急危机管理工具几乎总是导致这种变化。另一方面,业务实体活动中的危机现象导致需要引入组织变革。在这方面,应当指出,在这些变化开始实际执行之前就对其进行诊断是很重要的。当需要在危机管理的背景下引入所谓的大规模变革时,这个问题尤为重要。一开始的任何错误都很可能导致无法实现设定的目标,并在这些变化的实际实施中出现问题。因此,本文在研究结果的基础上,提出了在危机管理初始条件下企业活动的组织变化的诊断,考虑四个方面,与理论和实践中著名的Adizes的paei模型相对应。同时,它规定了确定组织变革的市场导向(组织变革的主动性);组织变革的社会取向(组织变革的整体性)组织变革对企业管理制度的影响(组织变革的互补性);组织变革对企业经营环境的影响(组织变革的功能性质)。本文提出了一种基于层次分析法(Analytic hierarchy Process - AHP)的危机管理条件下企业活动组织变革诊断方法,并提出了关键阶段的实施方法:组建专家组;确定在反危机管理条件下诊断组织变化的层次模型的水平研究组织变革的本质和特征,利用两两比较矩阵,从主动性、整体性、功能性和互补性四个方向对组织变革进行诊断;确定特征向量,以及建立它们的归一化值,应用已知的矩阵线的几何平均值;确定专家意见的一致性;形成结论和建议。对利沃夫地区几个商业实体的例子进行了相关计算,证实了在危机管理背景下实际使用所提出的诊断企业活动中组织变化的方法的可能性。