{"title":"KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRI TERBIMBING DAN MEANS ENDS ANALYSIS","authors":"Yenny Puspita Sari, Masri Masri","doi":"10.36085/math-umb.edu.v7i2.780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research aims to see the difference of mathematical problem solving students with Guided Inquiry learning model and Means Ends Analysis (MEA) learning model. This research was a quasi-experimental research in SMPN 14 Kota Bengkulu. The population of this research is all of VIII class students, with the sample of research is VIII I class as the experimental class I that given using guided inquiry model treatment, students of class VIII 3 as the experimental class II that given Means Ends Analysis model treatment, students of class VIII 2 as the control class that given conventional model treatment. The data collection of students result study using mathematical problem solving skills test consists of pre-test and post-test. The data obtained were analyzed using one path ANAVA and continued with BNT test. Based on the ANAVA result there is a difference between students' mathematical problem solving abilities in experimental class I, experimental class II and control class. From the BNT test that the treatment between experimental class I given the Guided Inquiry, Experimental class II treatment given the Means Ends Analysis treatment no difference in mathematical problem solving ability, while experimental class I (Guided Inquiry) with control and experimental class II Means Ends Analysis with the control there is a difference in problem solving abilities mathematically and the highest average score was obtained in the students treated with the Guided Inquiry model. Keywords : Ability of Mathematical Problem Solving Students, Guided Inquiry Model, Means Ends Analysis Model","PeriodicalId":135040,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Math-UMB.EDU","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Math-UMB.EDU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36085/math-umb.edu.v7i2.780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this research aims to see the difference of mathematical problem solving students with Guided Inquiry learning model and Means Ends Analysis (MEA) learning model. This research was a quasi-experimental research in SMPN 14 Kota Bengkulu. The population of this research is all of VIII class students, with the sample of research is VIII I class as the experimental class I that given using guided inquiry model treatment, students of class VIII 3 as the experimental class II that given Means Ends Analysis model treatment, students of class VIII 2 as the control class that given conventional model treatment. The data collection of students result study using mathematical problem solving skills test consists of pre-test and post-test. The data obtained were analyzed using one path ANAVA and continued with BNT test. Based on the ANAVA result there is a difference between students' mathematical problem solving abilities in experimental class I, experimental class II and control class. From the BNT test that the treatment between experimental class I given the Guided Inquiry, Experimental class II treatment given the Means Ends Analysis treatment no difference in mathematical problem solving ability, while experimental class I (Guided Inquiry) with control and experimental class II Means Ends Analysis with the control there is a difference in problem solving abilities mathematically and the highest average score was obtained in the students treated with the Guided Inquiry model. Keywords : Ability of Mathematical Problem Solving Students, Guided Inquiry Model, Means Ends Analysis Model