KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRI TERBIMBING DAN MEANS ENDS ANALYSIS

Yenny Puspita Sari, Masri Masri
{"title":"KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRI TERBIMBING DAN MEANS ENDS ANALYSIS","authors":"Yenny Puspita Sari, Masri Masri","doi":"10.36085/math-umb.edu.v7i2.780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research aims to see the difference of mathematical problem solving students with Guided Inquiry learning model and Means Ends Analysis (MEA) learning model. This research was a quasi-experimental research in SMPN 14 Kota Bengkulu. The population of this research is all of VIII class students, with the sample of research is VIII I class as the experimental class I that given using guided inquiry model treatment, students of class VIII 3 as the experimental class II that given Means Ends Analysis model treatment, students of class VIII 2 as the control class that given conventional model treatment. The data collection of students result study using mathematical problem solving skills test consists of pre-test and post-test. The data obtained were analyzed using one path ANAVA and continued with BNT test. Based on the ANAVA result there is a difference between students' mathematical problem solving abilities in experimental class I, experimental class II and control class. From the BNT test that the treatment between experimental class I given the Guided Inquiry, Experimental class II treatment given the Means Ends Analysis  treatment no difference in mathematical problem solving ability, while experimental class I (Guided Inquiry) with control and experimental class II Means Ends Analysis with the control there is a difference in problem solving abilities mathematically and the highest average score was obtained in the students treated with the Guided Inquiry model.  Keywords : Ability of Mathematical Problem Solving Students, Guided Inquiry Model, Means Ends Analysis Model","PeriodicalId":135040,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Math-UMB.EDU","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Math-UMB.EDU","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36085/math-umb.edu.v7i2.780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this research aims to see the difference of mathematical problem solving students with Guided Inquiry learning model and Means Ends Analysis (MEA) learning model. This research was a quasi-experimental research in SMPN 14 Kota Bengkulu. The population of this research is all of VIII class students, with the sample of research is VIII I class as the experimental class I that given using guided inquiry model treatment, students of class VIII 3 as the experimental class II that given Means Ends Analysis model treatment, students of class VIII 2 as the control class that given conventional model treatment. The data collection of students result study using mathematical problem solving skills test consists of pre-test and post-test. The data obtained were analyzed using one path ANAVA and continued with BNT test. Based on the ANAVA result there is a difference between students' mathematical problem solving abilities in experimental class I, experimental class II and control class. From the BNT test that the treatment between experimental class I given the Guided Inquiry, Experimental class II treatment given the Means Ends Analysis  treatment no difference in mathematical problem solving ability, while experimental class I (Guided Inquiry) with control and experimental class II Means Ends Analysis with the control there is a difference in problem solving abilities mathematically and the highest average score was obtained in the students treated with the Guided Inquiry model.  Keywords : Ability of Mathematical Problem Solving Students, Guided Inquiry Model, Means Ends Analysis Model
本研究旨在观察引导性探究学习模式和目的分析(MEA)学习模式下数学问题解决学生的差异。本研究为亚打明古鲁SMPN 14的准试验研究。本研究的总体为所有VIII班学生,研究样本为VIII I班作为实验I班,采用引导性探究模型处理,VIII 3班作为实验II班,采用均值分析模型处理,VIII 2班作为对照班,采用常规模型处理。利用数学解题能力测试对学生成绩学习进行数据收集,分为前测和后测两部分。所得数据采用单路ANAVA分析,并继续进行BNT测试。从ANAVA结果来看,实验一班、实验二班和控制班学生的数学问题解决能力存在差异。从BNT测验来看,实验组I给予引导性探究,实验组II给予均值分析处理之间在数学解题能力上无差异;而实验组I(引导探究)和实验组II(目的分析)在数学上解决问题的能力是有差异的,并且在接受引导探究模型的学生中获得了最高的平均分。关键词:学生数学解题能力引导探究模式目的分析模式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信