{"title":"Analyzing the use of email addresses in scholarly publications","authors":"M. Luwel, Nees Jan van Eck","doi":"10.55835/644287b5b8e4087ea9272b0f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to recent fraud cases followed by massive retractions of papers, the authors’ use of institutional versus non-institutional email addresses gained a lot of attention. A database was set up with all email addresses in the by-line of articles and reviews indexed in the Web of Science database.\nIn the period 2017-2021, the usage by corresponding authors of institutional email addresses is much more prolific in the Anglo-Saxon and Western European countries than in the BRICS countries. In the latter, corresponding authors use nearly as often a non-institutional as an institutional email address. The journals’ publishing model does not seem of have a large impact on the type of email address used. Most strikingly is the much more frequent usage of non-institutional email addresses in retracted papers compared to non-retracted papers.","PeriodicalId":334841,"journal":{"name":"27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023)","volume":"355 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"27th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators (STI 2023)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55835/644287b5b8e4087ea9272b0f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to recent fraud cases followed by massive retractions of papers, the authors’ use of institutional versus non-institutional email addresses gained a lot of attention. A database was set up with all email addresses in the by-line of articles and reviews indexed in the Web of Science database.
In the period 2017-2021, the usage by corresponding authors of institutional email addresses is much more prolific in the Anglo-Saxon and Western European countries than in the BRICS countries. In the latter, corresponding authors use nearly as often a non-institutional as an institutional email address. The journals’ publishing model does not seem of have a large impact on the type of email address used. Most strikingly is the much more frequent usage of non-institutional email addresses in retracted papers compared to non-retracted papers.
由于最近的欺诈案件导致大量论文被撤回,作者使用机构与非机构电子邮件地址的情况引起了很多关注。建立了一个数据库,其中包含在Web of Science数据库中索引的文章和评论的署名中的所有电子邮件地址。在2017-2021年期间,与金砖国家相比,盎格鲁-撒克逊国家和西欧国家的通讯作者使用机构电子邮件地址的次数要多得多。在后者中,通信作者使用非机构电子邮件地址的频率几乎与使用机构电子邮件地址的频率一样高。期刊的出版模式似乎对使用的电子邮件地址类型没有太大影响。最引人注目的是,与未撤稿的论文相比,被撤稿的论文中使用非机构电子邮件地址的频率要高得多。