Discrepancies in ABO and Rh Grouping in Southeast Iran, an Analysis of 3 Years' Experience

Esmaeil Sanei Moghaddam, S. Khosravi, A. Dorgalaleh
{"title":"Discrepancies in ABO and Rh Grouping in Southeast Iran, an Analysis of 3 Years' Experience","authors":"Esmaeil Sanei Moghaddam, S. Khosravi, A. Dorgalaleh","doi":"10.4172/2155-9864.1000364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: ABO and Rh blood grouping discrepancies are significant causes of transfusion-related morbidity and mortality. Most of these errors occur when blood grouping standards are unavailable or misinterpreted. This study determined the rate of such errors among hospitals in Zahedan, a city in southeast Iran. We also assessed the prevalence of ABO and Rh grouping errors in the Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization (IBTO) in Zahedan. \nMethod: During the study, 30,254 blood bags were sent to five of Zahedan's hospitals. Pre-transfusion ABO and Rh blood grouping was carried out by slide method. Any sample showing a discrepancy between IBTO and hospital laboratory was returned to IBTO for identification of the error by the American Association of Blood Banking (AABB) standards protocol. \nResults: We observed 420 discrepancies in the pre-transfusion ABO and Rh blood grouping of 30,254 units, a 1.4 percent error, among Zahedan hospitals. The most common error was misidentification of group A as O (62 cases), while group B was misidentified as O in 41 cases. We discovered critical errors, such as misdiagnosis of A as B and vice versa, which could endanger the patient’s life. We also noted 20 misidentifications in routine IBTO laboratory testing, a 0.02 percent error. \nConclusion: The high incidence of pre-transfusion blood grouping errors emphasizes the necessity of always using standard forward and reverse grouping tests in hospitals.","PeriodicalId":182392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Blood Disorders and Transfusion","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Blood Disorders and Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9864.1000364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: ABO and Rh blood grouping discrepancies are significant causes of transfusion-related morbidity and mortality. Most of these errors occur when blood grouping standards are unavailable or misinterpreted. This study determined the rate of such errors among hospitals in Zahedan, a city in southeast Iran. We also assessed the prevalence of ABO and Rh grouping errors in the Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization (IBTO) in Zahedan. Method: During the study, 30,254 blood bags were sent to five of Zahedan's hospitals. Pre-transfusion ABO and Rh blood grouping was carried out by slide method. Any sample showing a discrepancy between IBTO and hospital laboratory was returned to IBTO for identification of the error by the American Association of Blood Banking (AABB) standards protocol. Results: We observed 420 discrepancies in the pre-transfusion ABO and Rh blood grouping of 30,254 units, a 1.4 percent error, among Zahedan hospitals. The most common error was misidentification of group A as O (62 cases), while group B was misidentified as O in 41 cases. We discovered critical errors, such as misdiagnosis of A as B and vice versa, which could endanger the patient’s life. We also noted 20 misidentifications in routine IBTO laboratory testing, a 0.02 percent error. Conclusion: The high incidence of pre-transfusion blood grouping errors emphasizes the necessity of always using standard forward and reverse grouping tests in hospitals.
伊朗东南部ABO血型与Rh血型差异的3年经验分析
背景:ABO和Rh血型差异是输血相关发病率和死亡率的重要原因。这些错误大多发生在无法获得血型标准或被误解时。这项研究确定了伊朗东南部城市扎黑丹医院的此类错误率。我们还评估了扎黑丹伊朗输血组织(IBTO) ABO和Rh分组错误的患病率。方法:在研究过程中,向扎黑丹5家医院寄送30254份血袋。输血前采用载玻片法进行ABO、Rh血型分型。根据美国血库协会(AABB)的标准协议,任何显示IBTO和医院实验室之间存在差异的样本都将返回IBTO进行错误识别。结果:我们在扎黑丹医院的30254个单位中观察到输血前ABO和Rh血型有420个差异,误差为1.4%。最常见的错误是将A组误认为O组(62例),将B组误认为O组(41例)。我们发现了严重的错误,例如将A误诊为B,反之亦然,这可能危及患者的生命。我们还注意到在常规IBTO实验室测试中有20个错误识别,错误率为0.02%。结论:输血前血型分型错误率高,强调了医院始终采用标准正反分型试验的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信