Esmaeil Sanei Moghaddam, S. Khosravi, A. Dorgalaleh
{"title":"Discrepancies in ABO and Rh Grouping in Southeast Iran, an Analysis of 3 Years' Experience","authors":"Esmaeil Sanei Moghaddam, S. Khosravi, A. Dorgalaleh","doi":"10.4172/2155-9864.1000364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: ABO and Rh blood grouping discrepancies are significant causes of transfusion-related morbidity and mortality. Most of these errors occur when blood grouping standards are unavailable or misinterpreted. This study determined the rate of such errors among hospitals in Zahedan, a city in southeast Iran. We also assessed the prevalence of ABO and Rh grouping errors in the Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization (IBTO) in Zahedan. \nMethod: During the study, 30,254 blood bags were sent to five of Zahedan's hospitals. Pre-transfusion ABO and Rh blood grouping was carried out by slide method. Any sample showing a discrepancy between IBTO and hospital laboratory was returned to IBTO for identification of the error by the American Association of Blood Banking (AABB) standards protocol. \nResults: We observed 420 discrepancies in the pre-transfusion ABO and Rh blood grouping of 30,254 units, a 1.4 percent error, among Zahedan hospitals. The most common error was misidentification of group A as O (62 cases), while group B was misidentified as O in 41 cases. We discovered critical errors, such as misdiagnosis of A as B and vice versa, which could endanger the patient’s life. We also noted 20 misidentifications in routine IBTO laboratory testing, a 0.02 percent error. \nConclusion: The high incidence of pre-transfusion blood grouping errors emphasizes the necessity of always using standard forward and reverse grouping tests in hospitals.","PeriodicalId":182392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Blood Disorders and Transfusion","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Blood Disorders and Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9864.1000364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Background: ABO and Rh blood grouping discrepancies are significant causes of transfusion-related morbidity and mortality. Most of these errors occur when blood grouping standards are unavailable or misinterpreted. This study determined the rate of such errors among hospitals in Zahedan, a city in southeast Iran. We also assessed the prevalence of ABO and Rh grouping errors in the Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization (IBTO) in Zahedan.
Method: During the study, 30,254 blood bags were sent to five of Zahedan's hospitals. Pre-transfusion ABO and Rh blood grouping was carried out by slide method. Any sample showing a discrepancy between IBTO and hospital laboratory was returned to IBTO for identification of the error by the American Association of Blood Banking (AABB) standards protocol.
Results: We observed 420 discrepancies in the pre-transfusion ABO and Rh blood grouping of 30,254 units, a 1.4 percent error, among Zahedan hospitals. The most common error was misidentification of group A as O (62 cases), while group B was misidentified as O in 41 cases. We discovered critical errors, such as misdiagnosis of A as B and vice versa, which could endanger the patient’s life. We also noted 20 misidentifications in routine IBTO laboratory testing, a 0.02 percent error.
Conclusion: The high incidence of pre-transfusion blood grouping errors emphasizes the necessity of always using standard forward and reverse grouping tests in hospitals.