Teaming engineers and technical communicators in interdisciplinary classrooms: working with and against compartmentalized knowledge

P. Wojahn, L. Riley, Young Ho Park
{"title":"Teaming engineers and technical communicators in interdisciplinary classrooms: working with and against compartmentalized knowledge","authors":"P. Wojahn, L. Riley, Young Ho Park","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2004.1375291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We highlight how, in interdisciplinary, capstone design courses, the most successful teams typically depend heavily on aspects often considered in science and engineering to be \"soft skills\": flexibility in handling differences, interpersonal strengths in interacting with others, positive attitudes toward collaboration, openness to alternative ideas and approaches, an ability to withhold decisions while various methods and alternatives are considered and weighed. We suggest that such elements are often ignored even in the upper-level courses students take, most often due to the real pressures we feel to teach students more technical skill sets associated with our own given disciplines. Yet, we argue the importance of explicitly teaching mindsets open to \"soft skills\" along with or as part of these more specialized skill sets. We highlight issues that have continued to surface as we have attempted to do just that. In addition, we share some of the less and more successful strategies we have adopted over a five-year collaboration for fostering mindsets that are often so much more a challenge to teach or to adopt.","PeriodicalId":202491,"journal":{"name":"International Professional Communication Conference, 2004. IPCC 2004. Proceedings.","volume":"552 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Professional Communication Conference, 2004. IPCC 2004. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2004.1375291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We highlight how, in interdisciplinary, capstone design courses, the most successful teams typically depend heavily on aspects often considered in science and engineering to be "soft skills": flexibility in handling differences, interpersonal strengths in interacting with others, positive attitudes toward collaboration, openness to alternative ideas and approaches, an ability to withhold decisions while various methods and alternatives are considered and weighed. We suggest that such elements are often ignored even in the upper-level courses students take, most often due to the real pressures we feel to teach students more technical skill sets associated with our own given disciplines. Yet, we argue the importance of explicitly teaching mindsets open to "soft skills" along with or as part of these more specialized skill sets. We highlight issues that have continued to surface as we have attempted to do just that. In addition, we share some of the less and more successful strategies we have adopted over a five-year collaboration for fostering mindsets that are often so much more a challenge to teach or to adopt.
在跨学科的课堂中,团队工程师和技术交流人员:利用或反对划分的知识
我们强调,在跨学科的顶点设计课程中,最成功的团队通常在很大程度上依赖于通常在科学和工程中被认为是“软技能”的方面:处理差异的灵活性,与他人互动的人际优势,对合作的积极态度,对替代想法和方法的开放性,在考虑和权衡各种方法和替代方案时保留决策的能力。我们认为,即使在学生上的高级课程中,这些因素也经常被忽视,最常见的原因是我们感到要教学生更多与我们自己的学科相关的技术技能的实际压力。然而,我们认为明确地教授“软技能”的重要性,或者作为这些更专业的技能集的一部分。我们在努力做到这一点的同时,也强调了不断出现的问题。此外,我们还分享了我们在五年的合作中采用的一些不太成功或比较成功的策略,这些策略用于培养思维模式,而这些思维模式的传授或采用往往是一个更大的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信