IMAGE OF V. PETROV-DOMONTOVYCH IN MEMOIRS AND CORRESPONDENCE OF HIS CONTEMPORARIES-EMIGRANTS

N. Koloshuk
{"title":"IMAGE OF V. PETROV-DOMONTOVYCH IN MEMOIRS AND CORRESPONDENCE OF HIS CONTEMPORARIES-EMIGRANTS","authors":"N. Koloshuk","doi":"10.28925/2412-2475.2021.17.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Actuality. The modern study of literature now does not give the answer for a question, if it is possible to create a character of a man from the life by facilities of nonfiction narration, however, it is convincing and full-blooded in the reader’s perception as an artistic image. Stating the Subject of the Study: forming of character-image of writer V. Petrov-Domontovych in the circle of the Ukrainian emigrants of the post-war wave due to their remembrances, letters, and essays. Research methodology: through the comparative hermeneutic interpretation of texts, and also later fiction texts that formed the character-image of V. Petrov. Stating the Aim of the Study. Other mechanisms of reader reception work in nonfiction genres, then in fiction, id est it becomes possible another result – the character of real V. Petrov. Results of the Study and originality. The image of Victor Petrov, formed in the memory of representatives of Ukrainian literary emigration and recorded in their memoirs and correspondence, is no less ambivalent, than images of characters in the fictional works of Victor Domontovych. Expatriate contemporaries saw their colleague differently and remembered in different situations, however, it is significant that people, in many respects disagree with moral assessments, hostile to others (as Ihor Kachurovsky, who always biased towards Yuri Sherekh-Shevelov and even repeated stereotyped allegations against him after his death) they were largely controversial in the estimation of V. Petrov. On the one hand, V. Domontovych deserved respect as a talented prose writer; on the other hand, V. Petrov was a mystery as a person. His collaboration with the Soviet special services did not cause unequivocal condemnation, since the circumstances of his \"disappearance\" from Munich in 1949 remained unclear. Most of those people who spoke about this event immediately after it was treated to the disappeared man with compassion because they suspected the \"human beings\"-brothers (Yuriy Lavrinenko) from the Soviet side. Image of V. Petrov mostly appears \"split\", as well as images of characters in the novels of V. Domontovich. The practical significance. In non-fictional texts, the researcher can trace the path of the formation of the image and stereotype, returning and approaching the prototype.","PeriodicalId":120787,"journal":{"name":"LITERARY PROCESS: methodology, names, trends","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LITERARY PROCESS: methodology, names, trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2021.17.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Actuality. The modern study of literature now does not give the answer for a question, if it is possible to create a character of a man from the life by facilities of nonfiction narration, however, it is convincing and full-blooded in the reader’s perception as an artistic image. Stating the Subject of the Study: forming of character-image of writer V. Petrov-Domontovych in the circle of the Ukrainian emigrants of the post-war wave due to their remembrances, letters, and essays. Research methodology: through the comparative hermeneutic interpretation of texts, and also later fiction texts that formed the character-image of V. Petrov. Stating the Aim of the Study. Other mechanisms of reader reception work in nonfiction genres, then in fiction, id est it becomes possible another result – the character of real V. Petrov. Results of the Study and originality. The image of Victor Petrov, formed in the memory of representatives of Ukrainian literary emigration and recorded in their memoirs and correspondence, is no less ambivalent, than images of characters in the fictional works of Victor Domontovych. Expatriate contemporaries saw their colleague differently and remembered in different situations, however, it is significant that people, in many respects disagree with moral assessments, hostile to others (as Ihor Kachurovsky, who always biased towards Yuri Sherekh-Shevelov and even repeated stereotyped allegations against him after his death) they were largely controversial in the estimation of V. Petrov. On the one hand, V. Domontovych deserved respect as a talented prose writer; on the other hand, V. Petrov was a mystery as a person. His collaboration with the Soviet special services did not cause unequivocal condemnation, since the circumstances of his "disappearance" from Munich in 1949 remained unclear. Most of those people who spoke about this event immediately after it was treated to the disappeared man with compassion because they suspected the "human beings"-brothers (Yuriy Lavrinenko) from the Soviet side. Image of V. Petrov mostly appears "split", as well as images of characters in the novels of V. Domontovich. The practical significance. In non-fictional texts, the researcher can trace the path of the formation of the image and stereotype, returning and approaching the prototype.
彼得罗夫-多蒙托维奇在回忆录和同时代移民的信件中的形象
现状。现代文学研究现在并没有给出一个问题的答案,如果有可能通过非虚构叙事的手段从生活中创造一个人的性格,但是,它作为一个艺术形象在读者的感知中是令人信服的和充满活力的。陈述研究的主题:作家V. Petrov-Domontovych在战后乌克兰移民的圈子中由于他们的记忆,信件和散文而形成的人物形象。研究方法:通过对文本的比较解释学解释,以及后来形成彼得罗夫人物形象的小说文本。说明研究的目的。读者接受的其他机制在非小说类型中发挥作用,然后在小说中发挥作用,这使得另一种结果成为可能-真实的V. Petrov的性格。研究结果和独创性。维克多·彼得罗夫的形象,是在乌克兰文学移民代表的记忆中形成的,记录在他们的回忆录和信件中,与维克多·多蒙托维奇的虚构作品中的人物形象一样,是矛盾的。然而,重要的是,人们在许多方面不同意道德评价,对他人怀有敌意(如伊霍尔·卡丘罗夫斯基,他总是偏向尤里·谢列赫-舍夫洛夫,甚至在他死后反复对他提出刻板的指控),他们对v·彼得罗夫的评价在很大程度上是有争议的。一方面,多蒙托维奇作为一位才华横溢的散文作家值得尊敬;另一方面,彼得罗夫本人又是一个谜。由于他1949年从慕尼黑“失踪”的具体情况仍不清楚,他与苏联特种部队的合作并没有引起明确的谴责。大多数在事件发生后立即谈论这件事的人对失踪的人都抱着同情的态度,因为他们怀疑这是苏联方面的“人类”兄弟(尤里·拉夫里年科)。V. Petrov的形象多以“分裂”的形式出现,V. Domontovich小说中的人物形象也是如此。现实意义。在非虚构文本中,研究者可以追溯形象和刻板印象形成的路径,回归并接近原型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信