Evaluating Perceived Safety and Comfort in Urban Civic Spaces

L. Kawshalya, U. Weerasinghe, D. Chandrasekara
{"title":"Evaluating Perceived Safety and Comfort in Urban Civic Spaces","authors":"L. Kawshalya, U. Weerasinghe, D. Chandrasekara","doi":"10.51983/tarce-2022.11.1.3232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The urban public spaces play a vital role in the enhancement of quality of life of the urbanites. Recent studies explicitly demonstrate the fact that these limited spaces in the urban context directly impact on the physical, social, and psychological health of its users. But some of these spaces are often underused or neglected as a result of perceived danger and risk implicit by the arrangement of elements. This is common in many designed urban public spaces. This study focuses on three types of urban civic spaces as squares, plazas and forecourts which are vital on sustainable development of urban communities.Accordingly, this research intends to develop a framework to assess perceived safety and comfort in urban civic spaces. The process (literature) identified seven main attributes namely visual qualities, spatial configuration, pleasurability, inclusiveness, convenience, activities, and imageability. The 54 sub-attributes ascertained under the main attributes were scored through observations and direct user ratings. Expert weightages and significance scores obtained through the process finalizes an equation to calculate the final perceived safety and comfort levels of the urban civic spaces. Validation of this framework in the context of Sri Lanka depicted that Arcade Independence Square (Square) is more psychologically safer and comfortable for the users, followed by Echelon square (plaza)and Fort station forecourt (forecourt). The final scores produced by the developed framework reflects the current condition of the civic space elaborating the demands for improvements. The proper use of this framework will result in convivial, safer, comfortable, and user-friendly urban civic spaces.","PeriodicalId":437898,"journal":{"name":"The Asian Review of Civil Engineering","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asian Review of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51983/tarce-2022.11.1.3232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The urban public spaces play a vital role in the enhancement of quality of life of the urbanites. Recent studies explicitly demonstrate the fact that these limited spaces in the urban context directly impact on the physical, social, and psychological health of its users. But some of these spaces are often underused or neglected as a result of perceived danger and risk implicit by the arrangement of elements. This is common in many designed urban public spaces. This study focuses on three types of urban civic spaces as squares, plazas and forecourts which are vital on sustainable development of urban communities.Accordingly, this research intends to develop a framework to assess perceived safety and comfort in urban civic spaces. The process (literature) identified seven main attributes namely visual qualities, spatial configuration, pleasurability, inclusiveness, convenience, activities, and imageability. The 54 sub-attributes ascertained under the main attributes were scored through observations and direct user ratings. Expert weightages and significance scores obtained through the process finalizes an equation to calculate the final perceived safety and comfort levels of the urban civic spaces. Validation of this framework in the context of Sri Lanka depicted that Arcade Independence Square (Square) is more psychologically safer and comfortable for the users, followed by Echelon square (plaza)and Fort station forecourt (forecourt). The final scores produced by the developed framework reflects the current condition of the civic space elaborating the demands for improvements. The proper use of this framework will result in convivial, safer, comfortable, and user-friendly urban civic spaces.
评价城市公共空间的感知安全性和舒适度
城市公共空间对提高城市居民的生活质量起着至关重要的作用。最近的研究明确表明,在城市环境中,这些有限的空间直接影响其使用者的身体、社会和心理健康。但是,由于元素的安排所隐含的危险和风险,其中一些空间往往没有得到充分利用或被忽视。这在许多设计好的城市公共空间中很常见。本研究主要关注广场、广场和前院这三种类型的城市公共空间,它们对城市社区的可持续发展至关重要。因此,本研究打算建立一个框架来评估城市公民空间的感知安全性和舒适性。该过程(文献)确定了七个主要属性,即视觉质量、空间配置、愉悦性、包容性、便利性、活动和可想象性。通过观察和直接用户评分对主属性下确定的54个子属性进行评分。专家权重和显著性分数通过这个过程得到最终的公式来计算城市公共空间的最终感知安全和舒适水平。在斯里兰卡的背景下对这个框架的验证表明,Arcade Independence Square(广场)对用户来说在心理上更安全、更舒适,其次是Echelon Square(广场)和Fort station forecourt(前院)。开发框架产生的最终分数反映了公民空间的现状,阐述了改进的需求。适当使用这一框架将产生欢乐、安全、舒适和用户友好的城市公民空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信