Comparative Accuracy of Different Classification Algorithms for Forest Cover Type Prediction

Rahul R. Kishore, Shalvin S. Narayan, S. Lal, Mahmood A. Rashid
{"title":"Comparative Accuracy of Different Classification Algorithms for Forest Cover Type Prediction","authors":"Rahul R. Kishore, Shalvin S. Narayan, S. Lal, Mahmood A. Rashid","doi":"10.1109/APWC-ON-CSE.2016.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning based classifiers used quite often for predicting forest cover types, are the Naïve Bayes classifier, the k-Nearest Neighbors classifier, and the Random forest classifier. This paper is directed towards examining all of these classifiers coupled with feature selection and attribute derivation in order to evaluate which one is best suited for forest cover type classification. Numerous training classifications were performed on each of the classifiers with different sets of features. Amongst the three classifiers evaluated in this work, the Random Forest classifier is exhibiting the best and highest accuracy over others. Feature selection also played a significant role in demonstrating the accuracy levels obtained in each of the classifiers.","PeriodicalId":353588,"journal":{"name":"2016 3rd Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE)","volume":"929 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 3rd Asia-Pacific World Congress on Computer Science and Engineering (APWC on CSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APWC-ON-CSE.2016.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Machine learning based classifiers used quite often for predicting forest cover types, are the Naïve Bayes classifier, the k-Nearest Neighbors classifier, and the Random forest classifier. This paper is directed towards examining all of these classifiers coupled with feature selection and attribute derivation in order to evaluate which one is best suited for forest cover type classification. Numerous training classifications were performed on each of the classifiers with different sets of features. Amongst the three classifiers evaluated in this work, the Random Forest classifier is exhibiting the best and highest accuracy over others. Feature selection also played a significant role in demonstrating the accuracy levels obtained in each of the classifiers.
不同分类算法在森林覆盖类型预测中的精度比较
基于机器学习的分类器经常用于预测森林覆盖类型,包括Naïve贝叶斯分类器、k近邻分类器和随机森林分类器。本文旨在结合特征选择和属性派生来检查所有这些分类器,以评估哪一个最适合森林覆盖类型分类。在每个具有不同特征集的分类器上进行了大量的训练分类。在本工作中评估的三个分类器中,随机森林分类器比其他分类器表现出最好和最高的准确性。特征选择在展示每个分类器获得的准确率水平方面也发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信