Lost in Transition : Empathy, Architecture, and Traditionality in the Early 20th Century of Dutch Indies

Arga Patria Dranie Putra, K. Kurniawan, Y. Lukito
{"title":"Lost in Transition : Empathy, Architecture, and Traditionality in the Early 20th Century of Dutch Indies","authors":"Arga Patria Dranie Putra, K. Kurniawan, Y. Lukito","doi":"10.2991/adics-elssh-19.2019.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The beginning of the 20th century can be regarded as a point of cultural and development shift towards modernity in Indonesia. These change comes along with the shifting paradigm of Colonialization that occurred in Dutch Indies, presenting figures of Dutch who were complained of having empathy towards Indies people. Multatuli with Max Havelar, Wilhelmina with Ethical Politics, Tillema with Kromoblanda, and a series Dutch Architects who are considered to have contributed to the development in Indonesia. Even thought so, there was a variety of declination from the Indies people thanks to the inability from both parties to understand each other, or as people says it lack of empathy. As the times goes on, DutchIndies people slowly accept the appropriated modernity offered by Dutch architect, however, it came with cost. The build environment culture that always been there with Indies people are seemingly lost in transition. This research paper seeks to elaborate on the discourse of empathy theory & examine it effects toward architectural dynamics in Dutch Indies in the 20th Century. The study was conducted through precedent studies. The understood elaboration then later will become a framework for understanding the development dynamics that occurred in Dutch East Indies at the early 20th","PeriodicalId":151654,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 Ahmad Dahlan International Conference Series on Education & Learning, Social Science & Humanities (ADICS-ELSSH 2019)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 Ahmad Dahlan International Conference Series on Education & Learning, Social Science & Humanities (ADICS-ELSSH 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/adics-elssh-19.2019.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The beginning of the 20th century can be regarded as a point of cultural and development shift towards modernity in Indonesia. These change comes along with the shifting paradigm of Colonialization that occurred in Dutch Indies, presenting figures of Dutch who were complained of having empathy towards Indies people. Multatuli with Max Havelar, Wilhelmina with Ethical Politics, Tillema with Kromoblanda, and a series Dutch Architects who are considered to have contributed to the development in Indonesia. Even thought so, there was a variety of declination from the Indies people thanks to the inability from both parties to understand each other, or as people says it lack of empathy. As the times goes on, DutchIndies people slowly accept the appropriated modernity offered by Dutch architect, however, it came with cost. The build environment culture that always been there with Indies people are seemingly lost in transition. This research paper seeks to elaborate on the discourse of empathy theory & examine it effects toward architectural dynamics in Dutch Indies in the 20th Century. The study was conducted through precedent studies. The understood elaboration then later will become a framework for understanding the development dynamics that occurred in Dutch East Indies at the early 20th
迷失在过渡中:20世纪早期荷属印度的移情、建筑和传统
20世纪初可以被视为印尼文化和发展向现代化转变的一个转折点。这些变化伴随着荷属印度的殖民模式的转变,荷兰人被抱怨对印度人有同理心。Multatuli与Max Havelar合作,Wilhelmina与Ethical Politics合作,Tillema与Kromoblanda合作,以及一系列荷兰建筑师,他们被认为对印度尼西亚的发展做出了贡献。尽管如此,由于双方无法相互理解,或者像人们所说的缺乏同理心,印度人还是有各种各样的拒绝。随着时间的推移,荷兰人慢慢接受了荷兰建筑师所提供的适当的现代性,然而,这是有代价的。一直存在于独立开发者身上的构建环境文化似乎在转变中消失了。本研究论文旨在阐述共情理论的话语,并考察其对20世纪荷兰印度群岛建筑动态的影响。这项研究是通过以往的研究进行的。后来的理解阐述将成为理解20世纪初荷属东印度群岛发展动态的框架
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信