Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Using an Electro-Thermal Bipolar Sealing Device and Conventional Ligation on the Incidence of Post-Renal Transplant Lymphoceles in Recipients

Safa Mezban, A. Almayyahi, Radhwan Mahdi, M. Al-Badran, H. Al-Khammas, Hayder Aledan
{"title":"Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effect of Using an Electro-Thermal Bipolar Sealing Device and Conventional Ligation on the Incidence of Post-Renal Transplant Lymphoceles in Recipients","authors":"Safa Mezban, A. Almayyahi, Radhwan Mahdi, M. Al-Badran, H. Al-Khammas, Hayder Aledan","doi":"10.37319/iqnjm.4.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Lymphocele development is a well-established complication following kidney transplant. Some devices, such as electrothermal bipolar sealing devices, have been found to reduce lymphatic drain following kidney transplantation.\nThe aim of the study: The purpose of the study is to compare the usage of conventional lymphatic ligation with the electrothermal bipolar sealing device and its influence on the formation of lymphoceles after kidney transplantation surgery.\nPatients and methods: A cohort retrospective and prospective study was conducted from May 2015 to November 2020 at the Basrah renal transplantation center in Al-Sader Teaching Hospital, Basrah. One hundred and thirty anonymized patients with end-stage renal diseases were involved in the present study. They were categorized into two groups: group 1 (conventional ligation group) with 70 patients and group 2 (electrothermal bipolar sealing device group) with 60 patients. The groups were compared and matched for possible risk factors. Patients were followed up for six weeks with full laboratory investigation (complet blood count, renal function tests, and liver function tests) and medical and surgical assessments. Statistical package of social siences version 25 was used for the statistical analysis of the data. Confidence intervals of 95% were applied as the dependent interval in statistics, and p-values < 0.05 were considered significant.\nResults: The mean age of the patients was parallel for both conventional ligation and electrothermal bipolar sealing device groups (34.69 ± 10.28 vs. 33.68 ± 10.35). The operative time (155.57 ± 17.9 vs. 140.33 ± 17.07), lymphocele development (12 (17.1%) vs. 4 (6.7%)), lymphatic drainage volume (974.57 ± 178.39 vs. 493.83 ± 163.65), and the days of drainage (8.28 ± 3.3 vs. 4.6 ± 1.4) showed statistically significant differences between the conventional ligation technique and the electrothermal bipolar sealing device technique (p < 0.05).\nConclusion: The cautery of bipolar vessels is advantageous when compared to conventional ligation in kidney transplant lymphatic dissection, reducing the risk of lymphocele occurrence, in addition to its feasibility, safety, and easy performance","PeriodicalId":333401,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi National journal of Medicine","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi National journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37319/iqnjm.4.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lymphocele development is a well-established complication following kidney transplant. Some devices, such as electrothermal bipolar sealing devices, have been found to reduce lymphatic drain following kidney transplantation. The aim of the study: The purpose of the study is to compare the usage of conventional lymphatic ligation with the electrothermal bipolar sealing device and its influence on the formation of lymphoceles after kidney transplantation surgery. Patients and methods: A cohort retrospective and prospective study was conducted from May 2015 to November 2020 at the Basrah renal transplantation center in Al-Sader Teaching Hospital, Basrah. One hundred and thirty anonymized patients with end-stage renal diseases were involved in the present study. They were categorized into two groups: group 1 (conventional ligation group) with 70 patients and group 2 (electrothermal bipolar sealing device group) with 60 patients. The groups were compared and matched for possible risk factors. Patients were followed up for six weeks with full laboratory investigation (complet blood count, renal function tests, and liver function tests) and medical and surgical assessments. Statistical package of social siences version 25 was used for the statistical analysis of the data. Confidence intervals of 95% were applied as the dependent interval in statistics, and p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: The mean age of the patients was parallel for both conventional ligation and electrothermal bipolar sealing device groups (34.69 ± 10.28 vs. 33.68 ± 10.35). The operative time (155.57 ± 17.9 vs. 140.33 ± 17.07), lymphocele development (12 (17.1%) vs. 4 (6.7%)), lymphatic drainage volume (974.57 ± 178.39 vs. 493.83 ± 163.65), and the days of drainage (8.28 ± 3.3 vs. 4.6 ± 1.4) showed statistically significant differences between the conventional ligation technique and the electrothermal bipolar sealing device technique (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The cautery of bipolar vessels is advantageous when compared to conventional ligation in kidney transplant lymphatic dissection, reducing the risk of lymphocele occurrence, in addition to its feasibility, safety, and easy performance
电热双极密封装置与传统结扎对肾移植后淋巴细胞发生率影响的比较研究
背景:淋巴囊肿是肾移植后常见的并发症。一些装置,如电热双极密封装置,已被发现可以减少肾移植后的淋巴引流。研究目的:本研究的目的是比较传统淋巴结扎与电热双极密封装置的使用及其对肾移植术后淋巴囊肿形成的影响。患者和方法:2015年5月至2020年11月在巴士拉Al-Sader教学医院的巴士拉肾移植中心进行了一项队列回顾性和前瞻性研究。130名匿名终末期肾病患者参与了本研究。将患者分为两组:1组(常规结扎组)70例,2组(电热双极密封装置组)60例。对两组进行比较,并对可能的危险因素进行匹配。患者随访6周,进行全面的实验室调查(全血细胞计数、肾功能检查和肝功能检查)以及内科和外科评估。使用社会科学统计软件包第25版对数据进行统计分析。统计学上采用95%的置信区间作为依赖区间,p值< 0.05为显著性。结果:常规结扎组和电热双极闭合组患者的平均年龄相当(34.69±10.28∶33.68±10.35)。在手术时间(155.57±17.9∶140.33±17.07)、淋巴囊肿发展(12(17.1%)∶4(6.7%))、淋巴引流量(974.57±178.39∶493.83±163.65)、引流天数(8.28±3.3∶4.6±1.4)方面,传统结扎技术与电热双极密封装置技术比较差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:双极血管烧灼术与传统结扎术相比,在肾移植淋巴清扫术中具有降低淋巴囊肿发生风险的优势,且可行、安全、操作简便
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信