Application of Umbrella and Most Favored Nation Clauses Related to Restrictions Imposed on the Ratione Materiae of an Arbitration Clause

Y. Hur, Jaewoong Yoon
{"title":"Application of Umbrella and Most Favored Nation Clauses Related to Restrictions Imposed on the Ratione Materiae of an Arbitration Clause","authors":"Y. Hur, Jaewoong Yoon","doi":"10.18104/kalc.2023.38.1.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study analyses the umbrella clause and the most favored nation clause by focusing on A11Y Ltd. v. Czech Republic issued under international commercial arbitration. \nResearch design, data, and methodology: Typical case analysis deals with the issues surrounding the selection of applicable cases for international commercial arbitration. \nResults: Under the arbitration clause, which explicitly excludes disputes regarding the FET clause and the non-discrimination clause, it is not acceptable to invoke both clauses through an umbrella clause. \nConclusions: Above all, from the facts of this case, it is thought that even if the jurisdiction is expanded, difficulties accompany the complete citation of a claim on the merits. Regarding a non-discrimination obligation, the Tribunal denies the distinction of administrative rules in the context of expropriation. On the other hand, the inappropriate behavior of the Labor Bureau is acknowledged, and there is room for violation of FET or the obligation to prohibit investment damage.","PeriodicalId":368687,"journal":{"name":"Korean Academy Of International Commerce","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Academy Of International Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18104/kalc.2023.38.1.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyses the umbrella clause and the most favored nation clause by focusing on A11Y Ltd. v. Czech Republic issued under international commercial arbitration. Research design, data, and methodology: Typical case analysis deals with the issues surrounding the selection of applicable cases for international commercial arbitration. Results: Under the arbitration clause, which explicitly excludes disputes regarding the FET clause and the non-discrimination clause, it is not acceptable to invoke both clauses through an umbrella clause. Conclusions: Above all, from the facts of this case, it is thought that even if the jurisdiction is expanded, difficulties accompany the complete citation of a claim on the merits. Regarding a non-discrimination obligation, the Tribunal denies the distinction of administrative rules in the context of expropriation. On the other hand, the inappropriate behavior of the Labor Bureau is acknowledged, and there is room for violation of FET or the obligation to prohibit investment damage.
与仲裁条款的属事事由限制有关的总括条款和最惠国条款的适用
目的:本研究以国际商事仲裁下的A11Y有限公司诉捷克共和国案为个案,分析总括条款和最惠国条款。研究设计、数据和方法:典型案例分析涉及围绕国际商事仲裁适用案例选择的问题。结果:在明确排除FET条款和非歧视条款争议的仲裁条款下,通过一个总括条款援引这两个条款是不可接受的。结论:最重要的是,从本案的事实来看,人们认为,即使扩大了管辖权,完整地引用关于案情的要求也会遇到困难。关于不歧视义务,法庭否认在征用方面区分行政规则。另一方面,劳动局的不当行为得到承认,存在违反FET或禁止投资损害义务的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信