Stakeholders Involvement in Performance Management in Public General Schools

K. Ploom, Toomas Haldma
{"title":"Stakeholders Involvement in Performance Management in Public General Schools","authors":"K. Ploom, Toomas Haldma","doi":"10.15157/TPEP.V20I2.835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to increasing concerns with the legitimacy and efficiency of public spending, performance management as a part of world-wide public sector reform, called New Public Management (NPM) has taken place. This is also the case of educational sector. In Estonian education system, legislation formally enables to design an integrated performance management system. But there is few research done to investigate how these policies and regulations ought to be put into force in order to gain the benefits considering the schools' and pupils' better performance.This study investigates how different stakeholders are involved into the performance management in Estonian general schools. The study is based on empirical survey data gathered from 303 schools providing secondary education in Estonia.The research findings have three main implications. Firstly, the paper contributes to the scarce knowledge about implementation of performance management issues in public schools. Our analysis revealed that compilation of school development plans in Estonian schools is rather a formal obligation. Therefore we propose that the analysis and discussion of the school development plans is needed to organize on regional level, involving all main stakeholders of a school. Secondly, we suggest that in the circumstances of a decentralised education system, like in Estonia, it is needed to implement, central practical performance assessment principles and guidance for the schools. Thirdly, it is highly necessary to improve schools’ cooperation with different stakeholder groups. Also the framework involving different stakeholder groups in the decentralized schools management system should be built up.","PeriodicalId":273366,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Behavior & Key Stakeholders eJournal","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Behavior & Key Stakeholders eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15157/TPEP.V20I2.835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In response to increasing concerns with the legitimacy and efficiency of public spending, performance management as a part of world-wide public sector reform, called New Public Management (NPM) has taken place. This is also the case of educational sector. In Estonian education system, legislation formally enables to design an integrated performance management system. But there is few research done to investigate how these policies and regulations ought to be put into force in order to gain the benefits considering the schools' and pupils' better performance.This study investigates how different stakeholders are involved into the performance management in Estonian general schools. The study is based on empirical survey data gathered from 303 schools providing secondary education in Estonia.The research findings have three main implications. Firstly, the paper contributes to the scarce knowledge about implementation of performance management issues in public schools. Our analysis revealed that compilation of school development plans in Estonian schools is rather a formal obligation. Therefore we propose that the analysis and discussion of the school development plans is needed to organize on regional level, involving all main stakeholders of a school. Secondly, we suggest that in the circumstances of a decentralised education system, like in Estonia, it is needed to implement, central practical performance assessment principles and guidance for the schools. Thirdly, it is highly necessary to improve schools’ cooperation with different stakeholder groups. Also the framework involving different stakeholder groups in the decentralized schools management system should be built up.
持份者参与公立普通学校绩效管理
为了回应对公共支出合法性和效率的日益关注,绩效管理作为全球公共部门改革的一部分,被称为新公共管理(NPM)已经发生。教育部门也是如此。在爱沙尼亚的教育制度中,立法正式使设计一个综合绩效管理制度成为可能。但是,考虑到学校和学生的更好表现,这些政策和法规应该如何实施才能获得好处,这方面的研究很少。本研究调查了不同的利益相关者如何参与爱沙尼亚普通学校的绩效管理。这项研究基于从爱沙尼亚303所提供中等教育的学校收集的实证调查数据。研究结果有三个主要含义。首先,本文对公立学校绩效管理实施问题的稀缺知识做出了贡献。我们的分析显示,爱沙尼亚学校发展计划的编制是一项相当正式的义务。因此,我们建议需要在区域层面组织对学校发展计划的分析和讨论,让学校的所有主要利益相关者都参与进来。第二,我们建议,在象爱沙尼亚那样分散的教育制度的情况下,需要为学校执行中央实际的成绩评估原则和指导。第三,加强学校与不同利益相关者群体的合作是非常必要的。建立分权学校管理体系中不同利益相关群体参与的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书