Quality assessment of knowledge-based software: some certification considerations

A.I. Vermesau
{"title":"Quality assessment of knowledge-based software: some certification considerations","authors":"A.I. Vermesau","doi":"10.1109/SESS.1997.595957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge-based technology is being applied to complex problem-solving and critical tasks in many application domains. Concerns have naturally arisen as to the dependability of knowledge-base systems (KBSs). As with any software, attention to quality and safety must be paid throughout the development of a KBS, and rigorous verification and validation (V&V) techniques must be employed. Research in KBS V&V has emerged as a distinct field only in the last decade and is intended to address issues associated with KBS quality aspects and to credit such applications with the same degree of dependability as conventional applications. However, a major drawback of the current state of acceptance of KBS software is the lack of standardization. Although standards do exist for software, extensions are needed to cope with specific KBS software characteristics. This paper advocates the idea that, although quality assessment of KBS software is still a challenging issue, KBS software is not an impossible one. Some V&V techniques based on specific KBS software properties are described in this paper which aims at indicating KBS acceptability requirements may be specified and evaluated, being at the same time a good basis for certification.","PeriodicalId":345428,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards","volume":"335 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Software Engineering Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SESS.1997.595957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Knowledge-based technology is being applied to complex problem-solving and critical tasks in many application domains. Concerns have naturally arisen as to the dependability of knowledge-base systems (KBSs). As with any software, attention to quality and safety must be paid throughout the development of a KBS, and rigorous verification and validation (V&V) techniques must be employed. Research in KBS V&V has emerged as a distinct field only in the last decade and is intended to address issues associated with KBS quality aspects and to credit such applications with the same degree of dependability as conventional applications. However, a major drawback of the current state of acceptance of KBS software is the lack of standardization. Although standards do exist for software, extensions are needed to cope with specific KBS software characteristics. This paper advocates the idea that, although quality assessment of KBS software is still a challenging issue, KBS software is not an impossible one. Some V&V techniques based on specific KBS software properties are described in this paper which aims at indicating KBS acceptability requirements may be specified and evaluated, being at the same time a good basis for certification.
知识型软件的质量评估:一些认证方面的考虑
基于知识的技术正被应用于许多应用领域的复杂问题解决和关键任务。人们自然会对知识库系统的可靠性产生担忧。与任何软件一样,在KBS的整个开发过程中必须注意质量和安全,并且必须采用严格的验证和确认(V&V)技术。KBS V&V的研究仅在过去十年中才成为一个独特的领域,其目的是解决与KBS质量方面相关的问题,并将这些应用程序与传统应用程序具有相同程度的可靠性。然而,目前接受KBS软件的一个主要缺点是缺乏标准化。虽然软件确实存在标准,但是需要扩展来处理特定的KBS软件特性。本文主张,虽然KBS软件的质量评估仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题,但KBS软件并不是不可能的。本文描述了一些基于特定KBS软件属性的V&V技术,旨在表明可以指定和评估KBS可接受性要求,同时为认证提供良好的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信