Application of the method of analysis of hierarchies to assess the software of complexes of automation means

Y. Budaretskiy, Y. Shchavinskiy, V. Kuznetsov, S. Nikolayev
{"title":"Application of the method of analysis of hierarchies to assess the software of complexes of automation means","authors":"Y. Budaretskiy, Y. Shchavinskiy, V. Kuznetsov, S. Nikolayev","doi":"10.33577/2312-4458.25.2021.3-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the current state of the methods for assessing the software of complexes of automation of fire control of artillery systems supplied to the artillery units of the Ground Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The actual problem of verification and certification of the developed samples of special software of such complexes is determined, which consists in the absence of established assessment procedures, a large subjective component in the existing methods for assessing software, the inconsistency of their norms in accordance with state and international standards. In the proposed conceptual model for assessing the quality of software, new metrics have been defined that will characterize special software that ensures the functioning of complexes of fire control automation systems for artillery subunits when they perform fire engagement tasks and which reflects the peculiarity of the use of artillery systems. To assess the proposed new metrics, the elements of their assessment and the mathematical apparatus for carrying out calculations are determined and substantiated. To determine the magnitude of the influence of indicators on the overall quality of software, a new approach is proposed, which consists in applying the method of analyzing hierarchies when determining the priority of indicators of elements, metrics, criteria and factors at each level of the hierarchy. The use of multicriteria analysis of the hierarchy analysis method ensures that the subjectivity of experts is avoided when assessing the quality of special software, it makes it possible to identify bottlenecks in the developed tactical and technical requirements for the software of the indicated complexes of automation tools for artillery systems and takes into account the mutual influence of indicators on the overall quality. A certain improved methodology, which more fully covers the software assessment process, will in the future be the basis for creating a quality assurance system for software of automation systems and forming a tool for their certification.","PeriodicalId":410766,"journal":{"name":"Military Technical Collection","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Technical Collection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33577/2312-4458.25.2021.3-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The article analyzes the current state of the methods for assessing the software of complexes of automation of fire control of artillery systems supplied to the artillery units of the Ground Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The actual problem of verification and certification of the developed samples of special software of such complexes is determined, which consists in the absence of established assessment procedures, a large subjective component in the existing methods for assessing software, the inconsistency of their norms in accordance with state and international standards. In the proposed conceptual model for assessing the quality of software, new metrics have been defined that will characterize special software that ensures the functioning of complexes of fire control automation systems for artillery subunits when they perform fire engagement tasks and which reflects the peculiarity of the use of artillery systems. To assess the proposed new metrics, the elements of their assessment and the mathematical apparatus for carrying out calculations are determined and substantiated. To determine the magnitude of the influence of indicators on the overall quality of software, a new approach is proposed, which consists in applying the method of analyzing hierarchies when determining the priority of indicators of elements, metrics, criteria and factors at each level of the hierarchy. The use of multicriteria analysis of the hierarchy analysis method ensures that the subjectivity of experts is avoided when assessing the quality of special software, it makes it possible to identify bottlenecks in the developed tactical and technical requirements for the software of the indicated complexes of automation tools for artillery systems and takes into account the mutual influence of indicators on the overall quality. A certain improved methodology, which more fully covers the software assessment process, will in the future be the basis for creating a quality assurance system for software of automation systems and forming a tool for their certification.
层次分析法在自动化手段综合体软件评价中的应用
本文分析了乌克兰武装部队地面部队炮兵部队火炮系统火控自动化综合体软件评估方法的现状。确定了这类综合体开发的专用软件样品验证认证的实际问题,即缺乏既定的评估程序,现有的软件评估方法主观成分较大,其规范与国家和国际标准不一致。在评估软件质量的拟议概念模型中,已经定义了新的度量标准,这些度量标准将描述特殊软件的特征,确保炮兵分队执行火力交战任务时火控自动化系统综合体的功能,并反映炮兵系统使用的特殊性。为了评估拟议的新量度,评估的要素和进行计算的数学仪器被确定和证实。为了确定指标对软件整体质量的影响程度,提出了一种新的方法,即应用层次分析法确定各层次要素、度量、标准和因素指标的优先级。层次分析法的多标准分析的使用确保了专家在评估特殊软件质量时避免了主观性,它使得有可能识别出对火炮系统自动化工具所指示的综合体的软件开发的战术和技术要求中的瓶颈,并考虑到指标对整体质量的相互影响。一种改进的方法,更全面地涵盖软件评估过程,将在未来成为创建自动化系统软件质量保证系统和形成其认证工具的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信