Comparative prospective study of biofeedback therapy and neuromuscular electrical stimulation in rehabilitation of patients with pelvic floor dysfunctions

V. Krutova, A. Nadtochy
{"title":"Comparative prospective study of biofeedback therapy and neuromuscular electrical stimulation in rehabilitation of patients with pelvic floor dysfunctions","authors":"V. Krutova, A. Nadtochy","doi":"10.47093/22187332.2019.3.13-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of the combined effects of biological feedback (BFB therapy) and electro-impulse stimulation (EIS) in rehabilitation of patients with pelvic floor dysfunctions. Materials and methods. A comparative prospective study included 235 women with clinical and ultrasound signs of genital prolapse stages I–IV according to POP-Q. The observation program was completed by 209 patients who were divided into group 1 with stage I–II prolapse and group 2 with stage III–IV prolapse. Vaginal extraperitoneal vaginopexy with installation of mesh implant was performed in group 2 patients before inclusion in the study. Lifestyle modification was recommended for all patients. In each group, patients were divided into subgroups of control and treatment (BOS-the-rapy and EIS). Group 1: subgroup A – control (n=47), subgroup B – treatment (n=56); group 2: subgroup C – control (n=49), subgroup D – treatment (n=57). Index of influence on the quality of life (IQOLI) and parameters of ultrasound were evaluated. Results. subgroup B IQOLI subgroup the initial value p <0.05). subgroup the of the anterior urethro-vesical the Valsalva test the alpha angle load, leveling or reducing signs of prolapse in all patients. In subgroup A, the ultrasound parameters did not change, the dynamics of the prolapse stages were not noted. After a year of the program, the size of the anterior urethro-vesical angle at rest statistically significantly decreased in subgroups C and D. In subgroup D, the rotation of the alpha angle during loading, the size of the anterior urethro-vesical angle during the Valsalva test, and the smoothness of the beta angle at rest also decreased. In subgroup C, 4 (8%) cases of recurrence of genital prolapse were recorded; in subgroup D, no relapses were observed ( p =0.023). Conclusion. In patients with genital prolapse, both I–II stages and III–IV stages after surgical treatment, the use of biofeedback therapy and EIS are more effective than the standard recommendations for lifestyle modification with regard to reducing IQOLI and changing ultrasound parameters. Adherence to rehabilitation program was 89%.","PeriodicalId":129151,"journal":{"name":"Sechenov Medical Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sechenov Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47093/22187332.2019.3.13-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate the effectiveness of the combined effects of biological feedback (BFB therapy) and electro-impulse stimulation (EIS) in rehabilitation of patients with pelvic floor dysfunctions. Materials and methods. A comparative prospective study included 235 women with clinical and ultrasound signs of genital prolapse stages I–IV according to POP-Q. The observation program was completed by 209 patients who were divided into group 1 with stage I–II prolapse and group 2 with stage III–IV prolapse. Vaginal extraperitoneal vaginopexy with installation of mesh implant was performed in group 2 patients before inclusion in the study. Lifestyle modification was recommended for all patients. In each group, patients were divided into subgroups of control and treatment (BOS-the-rapy and EIS). Group 1: subgroup A – control (n=47), subgroup B – treatment (n=56); group 2: subgroup C – control (n=49), subgroup D – treatment (n=57). Index of influence on the quality of life (IQOLI) and parameters of ultrasound were evaluated. Results. subgroup B IQOLI subgroup the initial value p <0.05). subgroup the of the anterior urethro-vesical the Valsalva test the alpha angle load, leveling or reducing signs of prolapse in all patients. In subgroup A, the ultrasound parameters did not change, the dynamics of the prolapse stages were not noted. After a year of the program, the size of the anterior urethro-vesical angle at rest statistically significantly decreased in subgroups C and D. In subgroup D, the rotation of the alpha angle during loading, the size of the anterior urethro-vesical angle during the Valsalva test, and the smoothness of the beta angle at rest also decreased. In subgroup C, 4 (8%) cases of recurrence of genital prolapse were recorded; in subgroup D, no relapses were observed ( p =0.023). Conclusion. In patients with genital prolapse, both I–II stages and III–IV stages after surgical treatment, the use of biofeedback therapy and EIS are more effective than the standard recommendations for lifestyle modification with regard to reducing IQOLI and changing ultrasound parameters. Adherence to rehabilitation program was 89%.
生物反馈疗法与神经肌肉电刺激在盆底功能障碍患者康复中的比较前瞻性研究
的目标。评价生物反馈(BFB)与电脉冲刺激(EIS)联合治疗盆底功能障碍的疗效。材料和方法。一项比较前瞻性研究纳入了235名女性,根据POP-Q,她们的临床和超声表现为生殖器脱垂的I-IV期。209例患者完成观察方案,分为ⅰ-ⅱ期脱垂组1和ⅲ-ⅳ期脱垂组2。第2组患者在纳入研究前行阴道腹膜外阴道手术并安装网状植入物。建议所有患者改变生活方式。在每一组中,患者被分为对照组和治疗组(BOS-the-rapy和EIS)。1组:A亚组-对照组(n=47), B亚组-治疗组(n=56);2组:C亚组-对照组(n=49), D亚组-治疗组(n=57)。评价两组患者生活质量影响指数(IQOLI)及超声指标。结果。B亚组IQOLI亚组初始值p <0.05)。前尿道膀胱的Valsalva测试α角负荷,所有患者脱垂的水平或减少迹象。在A亚组,超声参数没有改变,脱垂阶段的动态没有记录。经过一年后,C亚组和D亚组静置时前尿道膀胱角的大小均有统计学意义上的降低。在D亚组中,加载时α角的旋转、Valsalva试验时前尿道膀胱角的大小、静置时β角的平整度也有所降低。C亚组有4例(8%)阴部脱垂复发;D亚组无复发(p =0.023)。结论。在手术治疗后的I-II期和III-IV期生殖器脱垂患者中,在降低IQOLI和改变超声参数方面,使用生物反馈疗法和EIS比标准建议的生活方式改变更有效。康复计划的依从性为89%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信