America’s Wetland? A National Survey of Willingness to Pay for Restoration of Louisiana’s Coastal Wetlands

D. Petrolia, Matthew G. Interis, M. Hidrue, Joonghyun Hwang, Ross G. Moore, GwanSeon Kim
{"title":"America’s Wetland? A National Survey of Willingness to Pay for Restoration of Louisiana’s Coastal Wetlands","authors":"D. Petrolia, Matthew G. Interis, M. Hidrue, Joonghyun Hwang, Ross G. Moore, GwanSeon Kim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2054867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A nationwide survey was conducted in the summer of 2011 via Knowledge Networks to estimate the willingness to pay (WTP) for a large-scale restoration project in the Barataria-Terrebonne National Estuary in coastal Louisiana. A split-sample approach was used to administer both a binary-choice (contingent valuation) and multinomial-choice (choice experiment) version of the survey, with the latter used to estimate willingness to pay for increments in three specific wetland ecosystem services: wildlife habitat, storm surge protection, and fisheries productivity. A total of 3,464 respondents completed the valuation exercise, of which 3,228 (93%) had neither visited nor live/lived in the study region. (Note also that only 32 respondents, < 1%, were Louisiana residents). Of the 1,397 respondents who completed the binary-choice version of the survey, 601 (43%) were willing to pay some positive amount of money for the proposed restoration project (costs ranged between $25 and $2,825 per household). Of the 2,067 respondents who completed the multinomial-choice version of the survey, 1,250 (60%) were willing to pay for some version of the restoration. Results indicate that confidence in federal and state government agencies, political leanings, and “green�? lifestyle choices were significant explanatory factors regarding support. All three wetland ecosystem services significantly affected project support, with increased fisheries productivity having the largest marginal effect, followed by improved storm surge protection, and increased wildlife habitat. Mean WTP for an intermediate-scale restoration program ranges between $909 and $1751 per household, with a total value between $105 billion and $201 billion, which exceeds a recent (and by far the largest) $100 billion restoration cost estimate.","PeriodicalId":308822,"journal":{"name":"Water Sustainability eJournal","volume":"227 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Sustainability eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2054867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A nationwide survey was conducted in the summer of 2011 via Knowledge Networks to estimate the willingness to pay (WTP) for a large-scale restoration project in the Barataria-Terrebonne National Estuary in coastal Louisiana. A split-sample approach was used to administer both a binary-choice (contingent valuation) and multinomial-choice (choice experiment) version of the survey, with the latter used to estimate willingness to pay for increments in three specific wetland ecosystem services: wildlife habitat, storm surge protection, and fisheries productivity. A total of 3,464 respondents completed the valuation exercise, of which 3,228 (93%) had neither visited nor live/lived in the study region. (Note also that only 32 respondents, < 1%, were Louisiana residents). Of the 1,397 respondents who completed the binary-choice version of the survey, 601 (43%) were willing to pay some positive amount of money for the proposed restoration project (costs ranged between $25 and $2,825 per household). Of the 2,067 respondents who completed the multinomial-choice version of the survey, 1,250 (60%) were willing to pay for some version of the restoration. Results indicate that confidence in federal and state government agencies, political leanings, and “green�? lifestyle choices were significant explanatory factors regarding support. All three wetland ecosystem services significantly affected project support, with increased fisheries productivity having the largest marginal effect, followed by improved storm surge protection, and increased wildlife habitat. Mean WTP for an intermediate-scale restoration program ranges between $909 and $1751 per household, with a total value between $105 billion and $201 billion, which exceeds a recent (and by far the largest) $100 billion restoration cost estimate.
美国的湿地?一项关于路易斯安那州沿海湿地恢复意愿的全国调查
2011年夏天,通过知识网络进行了一项全国性的调查,以估计路易斯安那州沿海Barataria-Terrebonne国家河口大规模修复项目的支付意愿(WTP)。我们采用了分裂样本的方法来管理二元选择(或有评估)和多项选择(选择实验)版本的调查,后者用于估计人们愿意为三种特定湿地生态系统服务的增加付费:野生动物栖息地、风暴潮保护和渔业生产力。共有3,464名受访者完成了估价工作,其中3,228人(93%)既没有去过研究地区,也没有在研究地区居住/生活。(还请注意,只有32名受访者(< 1%)是路易斯安那州居民)。在1,397名完成了二元选择版调查的受访者中,601人(43%)愿意为拟议的修复项目支付一定数量的钱(每户花费在25美元到2,825美元之间)。在2,067名完成多项选择版本调查的受访者中,1,250人(60%)愿意为某些版本的修复付费。结果表明,对联邦和州政府机构、政治倾向和“绿色”的信心。生活方式选择是支持的重要解释因素。所有三种湿地生态系统服务都显著影响了项目支持,其中提高渔业生产力的边际效应最大,其次是改善风暴潮防护和增加野生动物栖息地。中等规模修复计划的平均WTP在每户909美元至1751美元之间,总价值在1050亿美元至2010亿美元之间,超过了最近(也是迄今为止最大的)1000亿美元的修复成本估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信