Effect of Processing on Nutritional Value and Microbial Characteristics of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)

Emmanuel Kwaku Asamani, B. Maalekuu
{"title":"Effect of Processing on Nutritional Value and Microbial Characteristics of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)","authors":"Emmanuel Kwaku Asamani, B. Maalekuu","doi":"10.9734/ajahr/2023/v10i3234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Okra is consumed for its nutrients for healthy growth and development. Quality okra is essential for consumption and maximizing profits for okra producers and marketers. However, okra is perishable and limited in supply during the dry seasons. The stakeholders such as farmers, traders and consumers processed okra fruits to make them available all year round. Therefore, the objective of the study is to explore the effect of processing on nutritional value and microbial characteristics of okra fruits. The study involved both field survey and laboratory work among five okra producing communities within Sunyani Municipality Ghana, namely; Abesim, Atronie, Benu Nkwanta, Ayakomasu and Wawasua. Stratified sampling technique was used to select 50 farmers while purposive sampling technique was used to select 35 traders and 25 consumers, making a total of one hundred and ten respondents. Questionnaires were instruments used for the survey.  Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four treatments was used and blocked five times to obtain data for laboratory analyses. Results from the study indicated that, variety of okra fruits most cultivated, sold and consumed was Asutem, July to September were identified to be the months of bumper harvest for farmers, declined in prices of okra fruits for traders and low purchasing prices of okra fruits for consumers. The processing methods identified for processing okra fruits were slicing, pounding/ milling and roasting. Nutritional analyses on techniques used for processing okra fruits in the study area, revealed that, fiber, ash and calcium contents (18.47 %, 9.7 % and 0.43 %) were higher in sliced okra fruits and carbohydrate content (48.34 %) was higher in roasted okra fruits. Microbial contamination analyses on techniques used for processing okra fruits, showed that, there were lower (1.24, 0.83, 1.73 and 0.66 log10 CFU/g of Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium spp, respectively) in roasted okra fruits.","PeriodicalId":298912,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ajahr/2023/v10i3234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Okra is consumed for its nutrients for healthy growth and development. Quality okra is essential for consumption and maximizing profits for okra producers and marketers. However, okra is perishable and limited in supply during the dry seasons. The stakeholders such as farmers, traders and consumers processed okra fruits to make them available all year round. Therefore, the objective of the study is to explore the effect of processing on nutritional value and microbial characteristics of okra fruits. The study involved both field survey and laboratory work among five okra producing communities within Sunyani Municipality Ghana, namely; Abesim, Atronie, Benu Nkwanta, Ayakomasu and Wawasua. Stratified sampling technique was used to select 50 farmers while purposive sampling technique was used to select 35 traders and 25 consumers, making a total of one hundred and ten respondents. Questionnaires were instruments used for the survey.  Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four treatments was used and blocked five times to obtain data for laboratory analyses. Results from the study indicated that, variety of okra fruits most cultivated, sold and consumed was Asutem, July to September were identified to be the months of bumper harvest for farmers, declined in prices of okra fruits for traders and low purchasing prices of okra fruits for consumers. The processing methods identified for processing okra fruits were slicing, pounding/ milling and roasting. Nutritional analyses on techniques used for processing okra fruits in the study area, revealed that, fiber, ash and calcium contents (18.47 %, 9.7 % and 0.43 %) were higher in sliced okra fruits and carbohydrate content (48.34 %) was higher in roasted okra fruits. Microbial contamination analyses on techniques used for processing okra fruits, showed that, there were lower (1.24, 0.83, 1.73 and 0.66 log10 CFU/g of Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium spp, respectively) in roasted okra fruits.
加工对秋葵营养价值及微生物特性的影响
秋葵的营养成分有助于健康生长和发育。优质秋葵对秋葵生产者和营销商的消费和利润最大化至关重要。然而,秋葵易腐烂,在旱季供应有限。农民、贸易商和消费者等利益相关者对秋葵果实进行加工,使其一年四季都能买到。因此,本研究旨在探讨加工对秋葵果实营养价值和微生物特性的影响。该研究包括在加纳Sunyani市的五个秋葵生产社区进行实地调查和实验室工作,即;阿贝西姆、阿特罗尼、贝努·恩昆塔、绫子正和瓦瓦苏亚。采用分层抽样技术选取农民50人,采用目的抽样技术选取贸易商35人,消费者25人,共110人。问卷是用于调查的工具。随机完全区组设计(RCBD)采用四种处理,并阻断五次,以获得实验室分析的数据。研究结果表明,种植、销售和消费最多的秋葵水果品种为秋葵,7 - 9月为农民丰收月份,贸易商秋葵水果价格下降,消费者秋葵水果购买价格较低。秋葵果实的加工方法有切片、碾磨和烘烤。对研究区秋葵果实加工工艺的营养分析表明,切片秋葵果实的纤维、灰分和钙含量(18.47%、9.7%和0.43%)较高,烤秋葵果实的碳水化合物含量(48.34%)较高。对秋葵果实加工工艺的微生物污染分析表明,烤秋葵果实中黄曲霉、黑曲霉、指状青霉菌和青霉的污染浓度分别为1.24、0.83、1.73和0.66 log10 CFU/g。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信