{"title":"ResearchGate: Investigating Altmetric and Bibliometric Relationships for Environmental Science Researchers at Unisa","authors":"L. Adriaanse, C. Rensleigh","doi":"10.26803/myres.2018.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to establish the relationships between the altmetrics derived from the academic social networking tool ResearchGate and bibliometrics derived from the citation resources Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar to establish which academic social networking tools gives the most advantage. The investigation forms part of a longitudinal study investigating the e-visibility of the environmental science researchers at the University of South Africa during December 2014 and December 2016. The bibliometric indicators from Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar, and altmetric indicator data from ResearchGate were collected in six (6) month intervals, and analysed using SPSS to determine the Pearson’s rank correlations. The results indicated a positive correlation between the bibliometric indicators derived from Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar, and the altmetric indicators derived from the academic social networking tool ResearchGate. The results show that ResearchGate altimetric indicators influence the bibliometric indicators positively. ResearchGate therefore can be recommended for academic social networking as a strategy to influence the Environmental Science researcher’s citations positively at Unisa.","PeriodicalId":269540,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26803/myres.2018.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This paper aims to establish the relationships between the altmetrics derived from the academic social networking tool ResearchGate and bibliometrics derived from the citation resources Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar to establish which academic social networking tools gives the most advantage. The investigation forms part of a longitudinal study investigating the e-visibility of the environmental science researchers at the University of South Africa during December 2014 and December 2016. The bibliometric indicators from Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar, and altmetric indicator data from ResearchGate were collected in six (6) month intervals, and analysed using SPSS to determine the Pearson’s rank correlations. The results indicated a positive correlation between the bibliometric indicators derived from Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar, and the altmetric indicators derived from the academic social networking tool ResearchGate. The results show that ResearchGate altimetric indicators influence the bibliometric indicators positively. ResearchGate therefore can be recommended for academic social networking as a strategy to influence the Environmental Science researcher’s citations positively at Unisa.
本文旨在建立学术社交网络工具ResearchGate衍生的替代计量与引文资源Web of Science、Scopus和Google Scholar衍生的文献计量之间的关系,以确定哪个学术社交网络工具具有最大的优势。该调查是一项纵向研究的一部分,该研究调查了2014年12月至2016年12月期间南非大学环境科学研究人员的电子可见度。每隔6个月收集Web of Science、Scopus和Google Scholar的文献计量指标数据,以及ResearchGate的替代计量指标数据,并使用SPSS进行分析,确定Pearson 's rank相关性。结果表明,Web of Science、Scopus和Google Scholar的文献计量指标与学术社交工具ResearchGate的替代计量指标之间存在正相关关系。结果表明,ResearchGate的高程指标对文献计量指标有正向影响。因此,可以推荐ResearchGate作为学术社交网络的一种策略,以积极影响Unisa环境科学研究人员的引用。