The Kosovo Battle: Media's Recontextualization of the Serbian Nationalistic Discourses

K. Erjavec, Zala Volcic
{"title":"The Kosovo Battle: Media's Recontextualization of the Serbian Nationalistic Discourses","authors":"K. Erjavec, Zala Volcic","doi":"10.1177/1081180X07302943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2006, the international community started to finalize the political status of Kosovo, the Serbian province, inhabited mostly by the Muslim Albanian majority. At the end of October 2006, a referendum was held in Serbia, where a new constitution was passed that claims Kosovo as an integral part of Serbia. What has taken place in the so-called “last media battle for Kosovo”? This article investigates discourses of the two most popular Serbian newspapers and their coverage of the October 2006 events. The analysis of recontextualization shows that the newspapers continuously reproduce the dominant Serbian nationalism that focuses on a myth of a Greater Serbia. With an appropriation of different discourses, the dominant Serbian nationalism becomes legitimized and justified. In particular, the newspapers reproduce distinctive religious discourses from the political past, and furthermore, they borrow so-called European, “war on terrorism” and “crime” discourses from the international mainstream public spheres and appropriate them to the contemporary Serbian political context. Generally, the newspapers reappropriate different discourses by framing the Serbs as the victims of their own local “perpetrators,” the Kosovo Albanians.","PeriodicalId":145232,"journal":{"name":"The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics","volume":"190 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X07302943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

In 2006, the international community started to finalize the political status of Kosovo, the Serbian province, inhabited mostly by the Muslim Albanian majority. At the end of October 2006, a referendum was held in Serbia, where a new constitution was passed that claims Kosovo as an integral part of Serbia. What has taken place in the so-called “last media battle for Kosovo”? This article investigates discourses of the two most popular Serbian newspapers and their coverage of the October 2006 events. The analysis of recontextualization shows that the newspapers continuously reproduce the dominant Serbian nationalism that focuses on a myth of a Greater Serbia. With an appropriation of different discourses, the dominant Serbian nationalism becomes legitimized and justified. In particular, the newspapers reproduce distinctive religious discourses from the political past, and furthermore, they borrow so-called European, “war on terrorism” and “crime” discourses from the international mainstream public spheres and appropriate them to the contemporary Serbian political context. Generally, the newspapers reappropriate different discourses by framing the Serbs as the victims of their own local “perpetrators,” the Kosovo Albanians.
科索沃战争:媒体对塞尔维亚民族主义话语的重新语境化
2006年,国际社会开始最终确定科索沃的政治地位,科索沃是塞尔维亚的一个省,主要由占多数的穆斯林阿尔巴尼亚人居住。2006年10月底,塞尔维亚举行了全民公决,通过了一部新宪法,宣布科索沃是塞尔维亚不可分割的一部分。在所谓的“科索沃最后的媒体战”中发生了什么?本文调查两份最受欢迎的塞尔维亚报纸的言论,以及它们对2006年10月事件的报导。对再语境化的分析表明,报纸不断地再现了以大塞尔维亚神话为中心的占主导地位的塞尔维亚民族主义。随着不同话语的挪用,占主导地位的塞尔维亚民族主义变得合法化和正当。特别是,这些报纸从过去的政治中复制独特的宗教话语,此外,它们从国际主流公共领域借用所谓的欧洲“反恐战争”和“犯罪”话语,并将其适用于当代塞尔维亚的政治背景。一般来说,报纸通过将塞尔维亚人描绘成他们当地“肇事者”——科索沃阿尔巴尼亚人——的受害者,来重新利用不同的话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信