Reason for Case Closure Among Substantiated Reports of Elder Abuse

A. Neale, M. Hwalek, C. Goodrich, K. Quinn
{"title":"Reason for Case Closure Among Substantiated Reports of Elder Abuse","authors":"A. Neale, M. Hwalek, C. Goodrich, K. Quinn","doi":"10.1177/073346489701600404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reason for case closure was examined in a sample of 2,679 substantiated reports of elder abuse made over a 26-month period to the Illinois adult protective services (APS) program. The most common reason for case closure was the APS worker's assessment that the victim was no longer at risk for abuse (34.5%), followed by long-term care placement (21.4%), administrative closure (14.2%), victim refusal of services (12.3%), and victim death (12.0%). Victims with multiple impairments were more likely to enter long-term care. Victims who refused services tended to have abusers who were substance abusers, had mental illness, or were financially dependent on them. Those who died had more impairments and were more likely to be disabled or nonambulatory at the time of the abuse report.","PeriodicalId":220319,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Applied Gerontology","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Applied Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/073346489701600404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The reason for case closure was examined in a sample of 2,679 substantiated reports of elder abuse made over a 26-month period to the Illinois adult protective services (APS) program. The most common reason for case closure was the APS worker's assessment that the victim was no longer at risk for abuse (34.5%), followed by long-term care placement (21.4%), administrative closure (14.2%), victim refusal of services (12.3%), and victim death (12.0%). Victims with multiple impairments were more likely to enter long-term care. Victims who refused services tended to have abusers who were substance abusers, had mental illness, or were financially dependent on them. Those who died had more impairments and were more likely to be disabled or nonambulatory at the time of the abuse report.
在有证据的虐待老人报告中结案的原因
案件结案的原因是在26个月期间向伊利诺伊州成人保护服务(APS)计划提交的2679份经证实的虐待老年人报告样本中进行检查的。关闭案件最常见的原因是APS工作人员评估受害者不再有遭受虐待的风险(34.5%),其次是长期护理安置(21.4%)、行政关闭(14.2%)、受害者拒绝服务(12.3%)和受害者死亡(12.0%)。有多重损伤的受害者更有可能进入长期护理。拒绝服务的受害者往往有滥用药物、患有精神疾病或在经济上依赖他们的施虐者。那些死亡的人有更多的损伤,更有可能在虐待报告发生时残疾或不能走动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信