Beyond the Cultural Turn: A Critical Perspective on Culture-Discourse within Public Relations

A. Frame, Øyvind Ihlen
{"title":"Beyond the Cultural Turn: A Critical Perspective on Culture-Discourse within Public Relations","authors":"A. Frame, Øyvind Ihlen","doi":"10.1108/S2398-391420180000003009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nPurpose \nThis chapter applies recent theoretical developments linked to the concept of culture to the field of public relations research and practice, notably through the prism of creativity as a vector of cultural change. \n \n \nDesign/Methodology/Approach \nThe chapter is theoretical in nature and draws on relevant scientific literature in the field of public relations research, but also the social sciences more generally, and illustrates the issues being discussed with reference to relevant public relations campaigns. \n \n \nFindings \nWhile the field of public relations has moved beyond simplistic models of cultural values and characteristics, it is argued that more complex visions of culture have been neglected. Specifically, drawing on structuration theory, culture can be seen as a ‘system-generating mechanism’ relying on creativity to uphold and renew cultural references and norms. In this perspective, public relations is both producing/reproducing culture and being produced by culture. It follows that the concept should be apprehended not as an ontological category but as a social construct, as the source of heuristic and discursive categorisations. \n \n \nSocial Implications \nA call is issued for public relations to also question the ideological underpinnings of the production of symbols in which practitioners partake on a daily basis. \n \n \nOriginality/Value \nWhile the chapter fits into an emerging body of work discussing the cultural dimension of public relations, the link with creativity and the use of structuration theory to conceptualise this link contribute to its originality.","PeriodicalId":235161,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Public Relations and Communication Management","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Public Relations and Communication Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-391420180000003009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This chapter applies recent theoretical developments linked to the concept of culture to the field of public relations research and practice, notably through the prism of creativity as a vector of cultural change. Design/Methodology/Approach The chapter is theoretical in nature and draws on relevant scientific literature in the field of public relations research, but also the social sciences more generally, and illustrates the issues being discussed with reference to relevant public relations campaigns. Findings While the field of public relations has moved beyond simplistic models of cultural values and characteristics, it is argued that more complex visions of culture have been neglected. Specifically, drawing on structuration theory, culture can be seen as a ‘system-generating mechanism’ relying on creativity to uphold and renew cultural references and norms. In this perspective, public relations is both producing/reproducing culture and being produced by culture. It follows that the concept should be apprehended not as an ontological category but as a social construct, as the source of heuristic and discursive categorisations. Social Implications A call is issued for public relations to also question the ideological underpinnings of the production of symbols in which practitioners partake on a daily basis. Originality/Value While the chapter fits into an emerging body of work discussing the cultural dimension of public relations, the link with creativity and the use of structuration theory to conceptualise this link contribute to its originality.
超越文化转向:公共关系中的文化话语的批判视角
本章将最近与文化概念相关的理论发展应用于公共关系研究和实践领域,特别是通过创造力作为文化变革载体的棱镜。设计/方法/方法本章本质上是理论性的,并借鉴了公共关系研究领域的相关科学文献,但也更广泛地借鉴了社会科学,并说明了相关公共关系活动所讨论的问题。虽然公共关系领域已经超越了简单的文化价值和特征模型,但有人认为,更复杂的文化愿景被忽视了。具体来说,根据结构理论,文化可以被看作是一种依靠创造力来维护和更新文化参考和规范的“系统生成机制”。从这个角度来看,公共关系既是生产/再生产文化,也是被文化生产。因此,这个概念不应该被理解为一个本体论的范畴,而应该被理解为一个社会结构,作为启发式和话语分类的来源。社会影响公共关系也发出呼吁,质疑实践者每天参与的符号生产的意识形态基础。原创性/价值虽然本章适合于讨论公共关系的文化维度的新兴工作体,但与创造力的联系以及使用结构理论将这种联系概念化有助于其独创性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信