{"title":"國小教師倫理決定量表之建構","authors":"傅佳君 傅佳君","doi":"10.53106/199044282022105602004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 倫理決定指教師在教學過程中,面對倫理議題或倫理困境,而有倫理的敏覺認知,牽動的情緒感受,進而衍生的倫理傾向抉擇,從而表現的行為舉措。本研究旨在發展適合評估國小教師倫理決定之量表,包括感知、意圖、行動三個分量表。預試施測共取得132份有效問卷,經由項目分析、探索性因素分析及信度分析後,形成正式量表共10題。正式施測取得有效樣本529份。總量表Cronbach’s係數為.86,各分量表介於 .73~.82,具良好信度。本研究為瞭解驗證資料和量表的結構是否適配,進一步進行驗證性因素分析(CFA),整體模式適配情形理想。本研究發展之「國小教師倫理決定量表」有良好的信度與效度,可用以瞭解國小教師倫理決定狀況,亦可供後續研究者依此量表架構進行相關研究。\n This study developed a scale to investigate the ethical decision-making process of elementary school teachers in Kaohsiung and tested the accuracy of the scale. The scale included 3 subscales, namely awareness, intention, and praxis. A questionnaire survey method was adopted. In total, 132 elementary school teachers were included for pretesting. Item and factor analyses were performed to determine the validity and reliability of the research instruments. In total, 529 elementary school teachers were enrolled to verify the hypotheses. The Cronbach’s alpha for the overall scale was .86 and ranged between .73 and .82 for the subscales, which indicated good reliability. Further, this study used confirmatory factor analysis to confirm validity. The scale developed in this study has good reliability and validity. This scale can be used as a reference for future studies.\n \n","PeriodicalId":191393,"journal":{"name":"教育研究學報","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"教育研究學報","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/199044282022105602004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
倫理決定指教師在教學過程中,面對倫理議題或倫理困境,而有倫理的敏覺認知,牽動的情緒感受,進而衍生的倫理傾向抉擇,從而表現的行為舉措。本研究旨在發展適合評估國小教師倫理決定之量表,包括感知、意圖、行動三個分量表。預試施測共取得132份有效問卷,經由項目分析、探索性因素分析及信度分析後,形成正式量表共10題。正式施測取得有效樣本529份。總量表Cronbach’s係數為.86,各分量表介於 .73~.82,具良好信度。本研究為瞭解驗證資料和量表的結構是否適配,進一步進行驗證性因素分析(CFA),整體模式適配情形理想。本研究發展之「國小教師倫理決定量表」有良好的信度與效度,可用以瞭解國小教師倫理決定狀況,亦可供後續研究者依此量表架構進行相關研究。
This study developed a scale to investigate the ethical decision-making process of elementary school teachers in Kaohsiung and tested the accuracy of the scale. The scale included 3 subscales, namely awareness, intention, and praxis. A questionnaire survey method was adopted. In total, 132 elementary school teachers were included for pretesting. Item and factor analyses were performed to determine the validity and reliability of the research instruments. In total, 529 elementary school teachers were enrolled to verify the hypotheses. The Cronbach’s alpha for the overall scale was .86 and ranged between .73 and .82 for the subscales, which indicated good reliability. Further, this study used confirmatory factor analysis to confirm validity. The scale developed in this study has good reliability and validity. This scale can be used as a reference for future studies.
伦理决定指教师在教学过程中,面对伦理议题或伦理困境,而有伦理的敏觉认知,牵动的情绪感受,进而衍生的伦理倾向抉择,从而表现的行为举措。本研究旨在发展适合评估国小教师伦理决定之量表,包括感知、意图、行动三个分量表。预试施测共取得132份有效问卷,经由项目分析、探索性因素分析及信度分析后,形成正式量表共10题。正式施测取得有效样本529份。总量表Cronbach’s系数为.86,各分量表介于 .73~.82,具良好信度。本研究为了解验证资料和量表的结构是否适配,进一步进行验证性因素分析(CFA),整体模式适配情形理想。本研究发展之「国小教师伦理决定量表」有良好的信度与效度,可用以了解国小教师伦理决定状况,亦可供后续研究者依此量表架构进行相关研究。 This study developed a scale to investigate the ethical decision-making process of elementary school teachers in Kaohsiung and tested the accuracy of the scale. The scale included 3 subscales, namely awareness, intention, and praxis. A questionnaire survey method was adopted. In total, 132 elementary school teachers were included for pretesting. Item and factor analyses were performed to determine the validity and reliability of the research instruments. In total, 529 elementary school teachers were enrolled to verify the hypotheses. The Cronbach’s alpha for the overall scale was .86 and ranged between .73 and .82 for the subscales, which indicated good reliability. Further, this study used confirmatory factor analysis to confirm validity. The scale developed in this study has good reliability and validity. This scale can be used as a reference for future studies.