School learning barriers in higher education students

Lilia Sánchez-Rivera, M. Espericueta-Medina, Temístocles Muñoz-López, Leonardo Daniel LÓPEZ-CUELLAR
{"title":"School learning barriers in higher education students","authors":"Lilia Sánchez-Rivera, M. Espericueta-Medina, Temístocles Muñoz-López, Leonardo Daniel LÓPEZ-CUELLAR","doi":"10.35429/jum.2022.16.6.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this article was to compare the perception that the college student has with the scholar learning barriers. The methodology that was used was the quantitative, observational, transversal, descriptive and comparative. The compilation of this info was carried out through an instrument with 11 learning barriers questions of the academic environment, with 320 surveys in phase 3 of the Covid-19 Pandemic, applied to the faculties of Ciencia, Educación y Humanidades, Sistemas, Ingeniería, Mercadotecnia and Jurisprudencia of the Universidad Autónoma of Coahuila, the method of sampling that was utilized was not probabilistic through the strategy of sampling for convenience. The statistical techniques that were applied were the descriptive through frequencies and percentages, comparative with Kruskal-wallis method for independent samples and Mann Whitney U for two independent samples. The contribution of the study lies in that the students from faculty de Sistemas differ from the ones of the faculties of Mercadotecnia, Educación, Ingeniería and jurisprudencia in that they consider in large extent that the educational and pedagogical practices during the hybrid modality for the COVID-19 Lockdown, has been a learning barrier.","PeriodicalId":380799,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestión Universitaria","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestión Universitaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35429/jum.2022.16.6.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main objective of this article was to compare the perception that the college student has with the scholar learning barriers. The methodology that was used was the quantitative, observational, transversal, descriptive and comparative. The compilation of this info was carried out through an instrument with 11 learning barriers questions of the academic environment, with 320 surveys in phase 3 of the Covid-19 Pandemic, applied to the faculties of Ciencia, Educación y Humanidades, Sistemas, Ingeniería, Mercadotecnia and Jurisprudencia of the Universidad Autónoma of Coahuila, the method of sampling that was utilized was not probabilistic through the strategy of sampling for convenience. The statistical techniques that were applied were the descriptive through frequencies and percentages, comparative with Kruskal-wallis method for independent samples and Mann Whitney U for two independent samples. The contribution of the study lies in that the students from faculty de Sistemas differ from the ones of the faculties of Mercadotecnia, Educación, Ingeniería and jurisprudencia in that they consider in large extent that the educational and pedagogical practices during the hybrid modality for the COVID-19 Lockdown, has been a learning barrier.
高等院校学生学习障碍
本文的主要目的是比较大学生和学者对学习障碍的认知。所采用的方法是定量的、观察的、横向的、描述的和比较的。这些信息的汇编是通过一个包含11个学术环境学习障碍问题的工具进行的,在Covid-19大流行的第三阶段进行了320次调查,这些调查适用于科阿韦拉大学Autónoma的Ciencia、Educación y Humanidades、Sistemas、Ingeniería、Mercadotecnia和法学学院,所采用的抽样方法不是通过方便抽样的策略进行概率性的。应用的统计技术是通过频率和百分比描述,与独立样本的Kruskal-wallis方法和两个独立样本的Mann Whitney U方法进行比较。该研究的贡献在于,来自系统学院的学生与梅尔卡多特尼亚学院、Educación学院、Ingeniería学院和法学学院的学生不同,他们在很大程度上认为,在COVID-19封锁的混合模式期间,教育和教学实践一直是学习障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信