The Constraining Dynamics to Promote the Inclusive Village Governance in an Autocratic Leadership Setting

M. Taufiq, R. Hidayat
{"title":"The Constraining Dynamics to Promote the Inclusive Village Governance in an Autocratic Leadership Setting","authors":"M. Taufiq, R. Hidayat","doi":"10.47650/jglp.v4i1.442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the implementation dynamics of the Village Law in a certain context which was backgrounded by the village head's autocratic leadership style that tends to hinder the agenda for institutionalising inclusive governance based on social justice in the village development management. Accountability and citizen engagement as the foundation of term inclusive governance are the principal factors that must be implemented by the Village Government in their routine tasks. As qualitative research with a case study approach, this research utilized a purposive sampling technique to determine the key informants targeted from the elements of the government and villagers. To limit the focus of interest, this research only presents a discussion about the implementation dynamics of the Village Law with the setting of the leadership style of the Village Head in the 2011-2017 period. Field findings show that Dorokobo Village, Kempo District, Dompu Regency has complex socio-economic problems, thus requiring the presence of a responsive government and active villagers to jointly manage various development activities. Unfortunately, expectations of ideal leadership are not widely found in the past structure of the Village Government because they were only busy with various administrative activities and absent from substantive matters. Political leaders came with a procedural and even autocratic style so that the regular participation spaces were limited opened by only involving the elite without the presence of all components of the community. The absence of a progressive process to develop institutional accountability was due to the lack of power that can compel the Village Government to apply the principles of accountability and transparency in their activities.","PeriodicalId":252102,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Governance and Local Politics (JGLP)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Governance and Local Politics (JGLP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47650/jglp.v4i1.442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses the implementation dynamics of the Village Law in a certain context which was backgrounded by the village head's autocratic leadership style that tends to hinder the agenda for institutionalising inclusive governance based on social justice in the village development management. Accountability and citizen engagement as the foundation of term inclusive governance are the principal factors that must be implemented by the Village Government in their routine tasks. As qualitative research with a case study approach, this research utilized a purposive sampling technique to determine the key informants targeted from the elements of the government and villagers. To limit the focus of interest, this research only presents a discussion about the implementation dynamics of the Village Law with the setting of the leadership style of the Village Head in the 2011-2017 period. Field findings show that Dorokobo Village, Kempo District, Dompu Regency has complex socio-economic problems, thus requiring the presence of a responsive government and active villagers to jointly manage various development activities. Unfortunately, expectations of ideal leadership are not widely found in the past structure of the Village Government because they were only busy with various administrative activities and absent from substantive matters. Political leaders came with a procedural and even autocratic style so that the regular participation spaces were limited opened by only involving the elite without the presence of all components of the community. The absence of a progressive process to develop institutional accountability was due to the lack of power that can compel the Village Government to apply the principles of accountability and transparency in their activities.
专制领导下促进包容性村庄治理的约束动力
本文讨论了《村法》在特定背景下的实施动态,这种背景是村长的专制领导风格,这种风格往往会阻碍基于社会正义的包容性治理在村庄发展管理中的制度化议程。问责制和公民参与作为长期包容性治理的基础,是村政府在日常工作中必须贯彻的主要因素。作为案例研究的定性研究,本研究采用有目的的抽样技术,从政府和村民中确定关键举报人。为限制兴趣焦点,本研究仅以2011-2017年村长领导风格为背景,对《村法》的实施动态进行探讨。实地调查结果表明,东普县肯波区Dorokobo村存在复杂的社会经济问题,因此需要一个积极响应的政府和积极的村民共同管理各种发展活动。不幸的是,在过去的村政府结构中,理想领导的期望并不普遍,因为他们只忙于各种行政活动,而没有实质性的事情。政治领导人以一种程序化甚至专制的风格出现,因此常规的参与空间被限制开放,只涉及精英,而没有社区的所有组成部分。由于缺乏能够迫使村政府在其活动中实行问责制和透明度原则的权力,因此缺乏发展机构问责制的渐进进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信