Sensitivity Level of Placenta Accreta Index (PAI) Score and Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Stage as Preoperative Diagnostic Tools for Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders (PASD) at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan Indonesia

Utari Purnama, M. Sitepu, D. Edianto, S. Lumbanraja, Yudha Sudewo, R. Y. Simanjuntak, M. P. Lubis, Melvin Nova Gunawanto Barus
{"title":"Sensitivity Level of Placenta Accreta Index (PAI) Score and Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) Stage as Preoperative Diagnostic Tools for Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders (PASD) at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan Indonesia","authors":"Utari Purnama, M. Sitepu, D. Edianto, S. Lumbanraja, Yudha Sudewo, R. Y. Simanjuntak, M. P. Lubis, Melvin Nova Gunawanto Barus","doi":"10.2174/1573404817666210811130136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe incidence of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders (PASD) increases by 10-fold in 50 years along with the number of cesarean sections. Ultrasound examination using Placenta Accreta Index (PAI) score and Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) stage as a predictor of PASD has been used worldwide at the antenatal screening. The high diagnostic value of these tools will help the physician to diagnose PASD early and minimize the rate of maternal neonatal mortality and morbidity. \n\n\n\n\nTo evaluate the value of PAI score and PAS stage in diagnosing PASD. \n\n\n\n\nThis study is a diagnostic test study using the medical records of mothers who gave birth at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan Indonesia between September 2017 to September 2020, who were diagnosed preoperatively as placenta previa suspected PASD through ultrasound examination using PAI score or PAS stage. The results of these two diagnostic tests were compared to clinical diagnostic criteria of PASD from The International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) with or without histopathological confirmation. Results: Of the 177 placenta previa cases, there were 142 women with PASD (80.2%). The diagnostic values of PAI score with 4.6 as an optimal cut-off point were 75% sensitivity, 83% specificity, 94% positive predictive values (PPV), and 47% negative predictive values (NPV). The diagnostic values of the PAS stage were 90% sensitivity, 83%, specificity, 96% PPV, and 68% NPV. \n\n\n\n\nPAI score and PAS stage have a diagnostic value that looks equally good when used as a diagnostic tool for PASD.\n\n","PeriodicalId":371340,"journal":{"name":"Current Womens Health Reviews","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Womens Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404817666210811130136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incidence of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders (PASD) increases by 10-fold in 50 years along with the number of cesarean sections. Ultrasound examination using Placenta Accreta Index (PAI) score and Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) stage as a predictor of PASD has been used worldwide at the antenatal screening. The high diagnostic value of these tools will help the physician to diagnose PASD early and minimize the rate of maternal neonatal mortality and morbidity. To evaluate the value of PAI score and PAS stage in diagnosing PASD. This study is a diagnostic test study using the medical records of mothers who gave birth at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan Indonesia between September 2017 to September 2020, who were diagnosed preoperatively as placenta previa suspected PASD through ultrasound examination using PAI score or PAS stage. The results of these two diagnostic tests were compared to clinical diagnostic criteria of PASD from The International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) with or without histopathological confirmation. Results: Of the 177 placenta previa cases, there were 142 women with PASD (80.2%). The diagnostic values of PAI score with 4.6 as an optimal cut-off point were 75% sensitivity, 83% specificity, 94% positive predictive values (PPV), and 47% negative predictive values (NPV). The diagnostic values of the PAS stage were 90% sensitivity, 83%, specificity, 96% PPV, and 68% NPV. PAI score and PAS stage have a diagnostic value that looks equally good when used as a diagnostic tool for PASD.
印度尼西亚棉兰哈基亚当马利克综合医院胎盘增生指数(PAI)评分和胎盘增生谱(PAS)分期作为胎盘增生谱障碍(PASD)术前诊断工具的敏感性水平
胎盘增生谱系障碍(PASD)的发病率在50年内随着剖宫产的数量增加了10倍。利用胎盘增生指数(PAI)评分和胎盘增生谱(PAS)分期进行超声检查作为PASD的预测指标已在全球范围内用于产前筛查。这些工具的高诊断价值将有助于医生早期诊断PASD,并最大限度地降低孕产妇新生儿死亡率和发病率。评价PAI评分和PAS分期对PASD的诊断价值。本研究是一项诊断试验研究,使用2017年9月至2020年9月在印度尼西亚棉兰哈吉亚当马利克综合医院分娩的母亲的医疗记录,这些母亲术前通过超声检查使用PAI评分或PAS分期诊断为前置胎盘疑似PASD。将这两项诊断试验的结果与国际妇产科学联合会(FIGO)的PASD临床诊断标准进行比较,并进行组织病理学证实。结果:177例前置胎盘患者中,有142例(80.2%)合并pad。以4.6为最佳分界点的PAI评分的诊断价值为75%的敏感性,83%的特异性,94%的阳性预测值(PPV)和47%的阴性预测值(NPV)。PAS分期的诊断价值为敏感性90%,特异性83%,PPV 96%, NPV 68%。作为PASD的诊断工具,PAI评分和PAS分期具有同样好的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信