Pause for Thought (Groups): Non-native Pausing Behavior and Ease of Processing of L2 Speech

Virtual PSLLT Pub Date : 2022-09-16 DOI:10.31274/psllt.13355
Sadi Phillips, Alejandra Aguilar, Hannah Alt, Isabelle Darcy
{"title":"Pause for Thought (Groups): Non-native Pausing Behavior and Ease of Processing of L2 Speech","authors":"Sadi Phillips, Alejandra Aguilar, Hannah Alt, Isabelle Darcy","doi":"10.31274/psllt.13355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Features of prosodic phrasing in English are difficult to acquire even for advanced learners. One notably difficult prosodic feature is \"thought-grouping\", or pausing to delineate meaningful word groups. Learners may split clauses unpredictably or skip prosodic boundaries, creating “run-on” sentences. Either pausing pattern may impede processing of non-native speech, but it is unclear how much they impact processing difficulty. We used a tone detection task as an indirect measure of how split and run-on sentences impact processing difficulty of L2 speech. Thirty-four native English listeners responded to short tones semi-randomly inserted in sentences spoken with target-like or non-target-like thought-grouping. Listeners also judged each sentence as true or false, ensuring they processed them for meaning (not listening for tones alone). Tone detection reaction times (RTs) were compared in three pausing conditions: Original (pause at clause boundary); Run-on (pause absent); Split (additional pause mid-clause). As predicted, non-target-like pausing increased processing difficulty as evidenced by RTs in Run-on or Split conditions being slower than in the Original condition. No clear difference emerged between Run-on and Split conditions. These findings provide corroborating evidence with a processing task that non-target-like pausing results in increased processing difficulty. We discuss the implications of these findings for language pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":405918,"journal":{"name":"Virtual PSLLT","volume":"278 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virtual PSLLT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31274/psllt.13355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Features of prosodic phrasing in English are difficult to acquire even for advanced learners. One notably difficult prosodic feature is "thought-grouping", or pausing to delineate meaningful word groups. Learners may split clauses unpredictably or skip prosodic boundaries, creating “run-on” sentences. Either pausing pattern may impede processing of non-native speech, but it is unclear how much they impact processing difficulty. We used a tone detection task as an indirect measure of how split and run-on sentences impact processing difficulty of L2 speech. Thirty-four native English listeners responded to short tones semi-randomly inserted in sentences spoken with target-like or non-target-like thought-grouping. Listeners also judged each sentence as true or false, ensuring they processed them for meaning (not listening for tones alone). Tone detection reaction times (RTs) were compared in three pausing conditions: Original (pause at clause boundary); Run-on (pause absent); Split (additional pause mid-clause). As predicted, non-target-like pausing increased processing difficulty as evidenced by RTs in Run-on or Split conditions being slower than in the Original condition. No clear difference emerged between Run-on and Split conditions. These findings provide corroborating evidence with a processing task that non-target-like pausing results in increased processing difficulty. We discuss the implications of these findings for language pedagogy.
思考停顿(组):非母语停顿行为与二语言语加工的容易程度
英语韵律短语的特点即使是高级学习者也很难掌握。一个非常困难的韵律特征是“思想分组”,或者暂停来描绘有意义的单词组。学习者可能会不可预测地分割句子或跳过韵律边界,创造出“连续”的句子。任何一种停顿模式都可能阻碍非母语语言的处理,但它们对处理难度的影响程度尚不清楚。我们使用音调检测任务作为间接测量分裂句和连续句对二语语音处理难度的影响。34名母语为英语的听众对半随机插入的短音调做出了反应,这些短音调出现在有目标或非目标思维分组的句子中。听众也会判断每句话的真假,确保他们根据意思进行处理(而不是只听语气)。对比三种暂停条件下的音调检测反应时间:原始(在子句边界处暂停);Run-on(缺席暂停);分割(在子句中间附加暂停)。正如预测的那样,非目标暂停增加了处理难度,这可以从运行或分裂条件下的RTs比原始条件下的慢来证明。运行状态和分裂状态之间没有明显的差异。这些发现为非目标样暂停导致处理难度增加的加工任务提供了确凿的证据。我们将讨论这些发现对语言教育学的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信