Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Perkuliahan Geometri Bilangan Kompleks Dengan Discovery Learning Dipadukan Dengan Cooperative Learning Tipe NHT (Numbered Head Together)

M. Turmuzi, K. Sarjana, J. Junaidi
{"title":"Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Perkuliahan Geometri Bilangan Kompleks Dengan Discovery Learning Dipadukan Dengan Cooperative Learning Tipe NHT (Numbered Head Together)","authors":"M. Turmuzi, K. Sarjana, J. Junaidi","doi":"10.29303/jm.v3i2.1521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to improve students' critical thinking skills in Geometry lectures through discovery learning combined with NHT Type Cooperative Learning. This research uses a class action research approach. Each cycle consists of several stages, namely: planning, action, observation, and reflection. At the planning stage consists of learning plan preparation activities, the preparation of research instruments, at the action stage includes the activities of providing action in the form of learning in accordance with the learning design that has been formed in accordance with the principles of discovery learning combined with NHT Cooperative Learning Type, the observation stage includes observation activities on student activities during learning, especially during discussions and the implementation of actions and obstacles encountered, and the reflection stage is a reflection of the implementation of learning activities based on observations and results of critical thinking skills through insertion tests. Matters of concern at this stage of reflection are the assessment of the implementation of actions, the obstacles that arise, and the progress that has been achieved. To obtain research data two types of research instruments were used. The research instrument in question is the observation sheet of the implementation of learning and observation guidelines as well as test questions on critical thinking skills at the end of the cycle. The results of this study indicate that the average percentage of students' critical thinking skills increased from cycle I to cycle II, namely 62.25% in cycle I increased to 81.70% in cycle II.","PeriodicalId":178880,"journal":{"name":"Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v3i2.1521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to improve students' critical thinking skills in Geometry lectures through discovery learning combined with NHT Type Cooperative Learning. This research uses a class action research approach. Each cycle consists of several stages, namely: planning, action, observation, and reflection. At the planning stage consists of learning plan preparation activities, the preparation of research instruments, at the action stage includes the activities of providing action in the form of learning in accordance with the learning design that has been formed in accordance with the principles of discovery learning combined with NHT Cooperative Learning Type, the observation stage includes observation activities on student activities during learning, especially during discussions and the implementation of actions and obstacles encountered, and the reflection stage is a reflection of the implementation of learning activities based on observations and results of critical thinking skills through insertion tests. Matters of concern at this stage of reflection are the assessment of the implementation of actions, the obstacles that arise, and the progress that has been achieved. To obtain research data two types of research instruments were used. The research instrument in question is the observation sheet of the implementation of learning and observation guidelines as well as test questions on critical thinking skills at the end of the cycle. The results of this study indicate that the average percentage of students' critical thinking skills increased from cycle I to cycle II, namely 62.25% in cycle I increased to 81.70% in cycle II.
本研究旨在透过发现式学习与NHT式合作学习相结合,提高学生在几何课堂上的批判性思维能力。本研究采用集体诉讼研究方法。每个循环由几个阶段组成,即:计划、行动、观察和反思。在计划阶段包括学习计划的准备活动,研究工具的准备,在行动阶段包括提供行动的活动,以学习的形式按照已经形成的学习设计,按照发现学习的原则与NHT合作学习类型相结合,观察阶段包括观察活动对学生的活动在学习过程中,特别是在讨论和实施过程中遇到的行动和障碍,而反思阶段则是根据观察和通过插入测试的结果来反映学习活动的实施情况和批判性思维技能。在这一反思阶段令人关切的事项是对各项行动的执行情况、出现的障碍和已经取得的进展的评估。为了获得研究数据,使用了两种类型的研究仪器。所讨论的研究工具是学习和观察指南执行情况的观察表,以及周期结束时批判性思维技能的测试问题。本研究结果表明,学生批判性思维技能的平均百分比从第一轮到第二轮有所上升,即从第一轮的62.25%上升到第二轮的81.70%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信