Investigation and Comparison of Phase noise and FoM of LC VCO and QVCO of 60 GHz to that of a Distributed Oscillator of 30 GHz with a Doubler

K. J. Narayana, K. Bhattacharyya
{"title":"Investigation and Comparison of Phase noise and FoM of LC VCO and QVCO of 60 GHz to that of a Distributed Oscillator of 30 GHz with a Doubler","authors":"K. J. Narayana, K. Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.1109/INDICON.2017.8487503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An LC VCO is designed for 60 GHz while the distributed oscillator (DO) is designed for 30 GHz, in 65 nm RF CMOS, both having a high output power of around 10 dBm (10 mW). The performance of two oscillators topologies, LC VCO and distributed oscillator, is compared. Simulation results show that the 30 GHz distributed oscillator has better phase noise compared to that of 60 GHz LC oscillator. The phase noise of DO is −101.85 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset from 30 GHz carrier while that of LC oscillator, it is −88.88 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset from 60 GHz carrier. A doubler is then used to double the DO frequency to 60 GHz but phase noise remains the same. Thus the 30 GHz distributed oscillator or even an LC VCO at 30 GHz, with a doubler can be used to achieve better phase noise performance at a higher frequency of 60 GHz. The 30 GHz LC VCO of phase noise −99.85 dBc/Hz at the same time has lesser DC power consumption than 60 GHz LC VCO. The 30 GHz DO and LC VCO has better FoM due to better phase noise performance, as compared to 60 GHz LC VCO. A 60 GHz LC QVCO has also been implemented having better phase noise than 60 GHz LC VCO. The QVCO provides 90° quadrature phase signals at its output. This work compares for the first time the performance of a distributed oscillator with that of an LC VCO and QVCO.","PeriodicalId":263943,"journal":{"name":"2017 14th IEEE India Council International Conference (INDICON)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 14th IEEE India Council International Conference (INDICON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDICON.2017.8487503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An LC VCO is designed for 60 GHz while the distributed oscillator (DO) is designed for 30 GHz, in 65 nm RF CMOS, both having a high output power of around 10 dBm (10 mW). The performance of two oscillators topologies, LC VCO and distributed oscillator, is compared. Simulation results show that the 30 GHz distributed oscillator has better phase noise compared to that of 60 GHz LC oscillator. The phase noise of DO is −101.85 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset from 30 GHz carrier while that of LC oscillator, it is −88.88 dBc/Hz at 1 MHz offset from 60 GHz carrier. A doubler is then used to double the DO frequency to 60 GHz but phase noise remains the same. Thus the 30 GHz distributed oscillator or even an LC VCO at 30 GHz, with a doubler can be used to achieve better phase noise performance at a higher frequency of 60 GHz. The 30 GHz LC VCO of phase noise −99.85 dBc/Hz at the same time has lesser DC power consumption than 60 GHz LC VCO. The 30 GHz DO and LC VCO has better FoM due to better phase noise performance, as compared to 60 GHz LC VCO. A 60 GHz LC QVCO has also been implemented having better phase noise than 60 GHz LC VCO. The QVCO provides 90° quadrature phase signals at its output. This work compares for the first time the performance of a distributed oscillator with that of an LC VCO and QVCO.
60 GHz的LC压控振荡器和带倍频器的30 GHz分布式振荡器的QVCO的相位噪声和FoM的研究与比较
LC VCO设计为60 GHz,分布式振荡器(DO)设计为30 GHz,采用65 nm RF CMOS,两者都具有约10 dBm (10 mW)的高输出功率。比较了LC压控振荡器和分布式振荡器两种振荡器拓扑结构的性能。仿真结果表明,与60 GHz LC振荡器相比,30 GHz分布式振荡器具有更好的相位噪声。在距30 GHz载波1 MHz偏移处,DO的相位噪声为−101.85 dBc/Hz,而LC振荡器在距60 GHz载波1 MHz偏移处的相位噪声为−88.88 dBc/Hz。然后使用倍频器将DO频率加倍至60 GHz,但相位噪声保持不变。因此,30 GHz分布式振荡器甚至30 GHz的LC压控振荡器,加上倍频器可以在60 GHz的更高频率上获得更好的相位噪声性能。同时相位噪声为−99.85 dBc/Hz的30ghz LC压控振荡器比60ghz LC压控振荡器具有更低的直流功耗。与60 GHz LC VCO相比,30 GHz DO和LC VCO具有更好的相位噪声性能,因此具有更好的FoM。此外,还实现了一种60 GHz LC QVCO,其相位噪声优于60 GHz LC VCO。QVCO在其输出端提供90°正交相位信号。本文首次比较了分布式振荡器与LC压控振荡器和QVCO的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信