SYNTACTICAL ERROR ANALYSIS ON REPORT TEXT

Soraya Grabiella Dinamika, Ridwan Hanafiah
{"title":"SYNTACTICAL ERROR ANALYSIS ON REPORT TEXT","authors":"Soraya Grabiella Dinamika, Ridwan Hanafiah","doi":"10.33369/JOALL.V4I2.7681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims at investigating and classifying the syntactical errors in the writing of report text made by 20 students of Department of English Literature of FIB-USU. Syntactical errors in writing made by EFL students are needed to be investigated by using the Error Analysis theory developed by Gass & Selinker in 2008 as it provides six appropriate investigation procedures, namely; collecting data, identifying errors, classifying errors, quantifying errors, analyzing errors and remediation.  Each of students was assigned to write a topic-based report text with the length of 150 up to 250 words in count. This study dealt with a qualitative descriptive approach. After the EA procedures applied, in this study found that the students made major syntactical errors within the use of article ‘a/an’,’ the’ in terms of omission and addition of articles, the use of relative pronoun, and the use of subject-verb agreement in terms of past tense agreement and number agreement. Based on the error analysis procedure applied, it was obtained that the most predominant syntactical errors made by the students was the use of article which comprises of 125 errors (50.2%), followed by the use of subject-verb agreement with 117 errors (47%) and followed by the use of relative pronoun as the least error which comprises of 7 errors (2.8%). The syntactical error made by the students caused by two major sources, intra-language error and intra-language error. By seeing at these problematic areas, the researcher has suggested to take out several related pedagogical remediation to the students.","PeriodicalId":202900,"journal":{"name":"JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature)","volume":"226 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33369/JOALL.V4I2.7681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

This study aims at investigating and classifying the syntactical errors in the writing of report text made by 20 students of Department of English Literature of FIB-USU. Syntactical errors in writing made by EFL students are needed to be investigated by using the Error Analysis theory developed by Gass & Selinker in 2008 as it provides six appropriate investigation procedures, namely; collecting data, identifying errors, classifying errors, quantifying errors, analyzing errors and remediation.  Each of students was assigned to write a topic-based report text with the length of 150 up to 250 words in count. This study dealt with a qualitative descriptive approach. After the EA procedures applied, in this study found that the students made major syntactical errors within the use of article ‘a/an’,’ the’ in terms of omission and addition of articles, the use of relative pronoun, and the use of subject-verb agreement in terms of past tense agreement and number agreement. Based on the error analysis procedure applied, it was obtained that the most predominant syntactical errors made by the students was the use of article which comprises of 125 errors (50.2%), followed by the use of subject-verb agreement with 117 errors (47%) and followed by the use of relative pronoun as the least error which comprises of 7 errors (2.8%). The syntactical error made by the students caused by two major sources, intra-language error and intra-language error. By seeing at these problematic areas, the researcher has suggested to take out several related pedagogical remediation to the students.
报告文本的句法错误分析
本研究的目的是调查和分类20名外国留学生英语文学系学生的报告语篇写作中的句法错误。使用Gass & Selinker在2008年提出的错误分析理论来调查英语学生的写作语法错误,该理论提供了六种适当的调查程序,即;收集数据,识别错误,分类错误,量化错误,分析错误和补救。每个学生被要求写一篇以主题为基础的报告文本,长度在150到250字之间。本研究采用定性描述方法。在应用EA程序后,本研究发现学生在冠词“a/an”的使用上犯了主要的语法错误,在冠词的省略和添加上犯了主要的语法错误,在关系代词的使用上犯了主要的语法错误,在过去时一致和数一致上犯了主要的语法错误。根据所采用的错误分析程序,学生的句法错误最多的是冠词的使用,有125个错误(50.2%),其次是主谓一致的使用,有117个错误(47%),其次是关系代词的使用,错误最少,有7个错误(2.8%)。学生的句法错误主要有两大来源:语内错误和语内错误。针对这些问题,研究者建议对学生采取一些相关的教学补救措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信