Why Are Conversational Assistants Still Black Boxes? The Case For Transparency

T. D. Huynh, W. Seymour, L. Moreau, J. Such
{"title":"Why Are Conversational Assistants Still Black Boxes? The Case For Transparency","authors":"T. D. Huynh, W. Seymour, L. Moreau, J. Such","doi":"10.1145/3571884.3604319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much has been written about privacy in the context of conversational and voice assistants. Yet, there have been remarkably few developments in terms of the actual privacy offered by these devices. But how much of this is due to the technical and design limitations of speech as an interaction modality? In this paper, we set out to reframe the discussion on why commercial conversational assistants do not offer meaningful privacy and transparency by demonstrating how they could. By instrumenting the open-source voice assistant Mycroft to capture audit trails for data access, we demonstrate how such functionality could be integrated into big players in the sector like Alexa and Google Assistant. We show that this problem can be solved with existing technology and open standards and is thus fundamentally a business decision rather than a technical limitation.","PeriodicalId":127379,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces","volume":"280 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3571884.3604319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Much has been written about privacy in the context of conversational and voice assistants. Yet, there have been remarkably few developments in terms of the actual privacy offered by these devices. But how much of this is due to the technical and design limitations of speech as an interaction modality? In this paper, we set out to reframe the discussion on why commercial conversational assistants do not offer meaningful privacy and transparency by demonstrating how they could. By instrumenting the open-source voice assistant Mycroft to capture audit trails for data access, we demonstrate how such functionality could be integrated into big players in the sector like Alexa and Google Assistant. We show that this problem can be solved with existing technology and open standards and is thus fundamentally a business decision rather than a technical limitation.
为什么会话助手仍然是黑匣子?透明度的理由
在对话和语音助手的背景下,已经有很多关于隐私的文章。然而,就这些设备提供的实际隐私而言,几乎没有什么进展。但这其中有多少是由于语音作为一种交互方式的技术和设计限制?在本文中,我们通过展示它们如何能够提供有意义的隐私和透明度,着手重新构建关于为什么商业会话助手不能提供有意义的隐私和透明度的讨论。通过使用开源语音助手Mycroft来捕获数据访问的审计跟踪,我们展示了如何将此类功能集成到Alexa和Google assistant等领域的大型参与者中。我们表明,这个问题可以用现有的技术和开放标准来解决,因此从根本上说,这是一个业务决策,而不是技术限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信