Containerized Application for IoT Devices: Comparison between balenaCloud and Amazon Web Services Approaches

Robert Botez, Vlad Strautiu, I. Ivanciu, V. Dobrota
{"title":"Containerized Application for IoT Devices: Comparison between balenaCloud and Amazon Web Services Approaches","authors":"Robert Botez, Vlad Strautiu, I. Ivanciu, V. Dobrota","doi":"10.1109/ISETC50328.2020.9301070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Depending on the requirements, the deployment of containerized applications for monitoring Internet of Things devices can be done in Cloud or on the Edge. This paper discusses the design of a containerized application monitoring temperature and humidity for IoT devices in three implementations: (1) balenaCloud for edge deployment; (2) Amazon Web Services cloud with EC2 instances; and (3) dedicated Amazon Web Services IoT service. The experiments showed that there are no significant performance differences between Edge and Cloud deployments regarding the resource consumption. However, for fast and almost effortless action, Amazon Web Services IoT is the go-to option when it comes to serverless applications based on Message Queuing Telemetry Transport. For all-in-one automated fleet management balenaCloud seems to be a good tool for IoT developers.","PeriodicalId":165650,"journal":{"name":"2020 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 International Symposium on Electronics and Telecommunications (ISETC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISETC50328.2020.9301070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Depending on the requirements, the deployment of containerized applications for monitoring Internet of Things devices can be done in Cloud or on the Edge. This paper discusses the design of a containerized application monitoring temperature and humidity for IoT devices in three implementations: (1) balenaCloud for edge deployment; (2) Amazon Web Services cloud with EC2 instances; and (3) dedicated Amazon Web Services IoT service. The experiments showed that there are no significant performance differences between Edge and Cloud deployments regarding the resource consumption. However, for fast and almost effortless action, Amazon Web Services IoT is the go-to option when it comes to serverless applications based on Message Queuing Telemetry Transport. For all-in-one automated fleet management balenaCloud seems to be a good tool for IoT developers.
物联网设备的容器化应用:balenecloud和Amazon Web Services方法的比较
根据需求,监控物联网设备的容器化应用程序的部署可以在云中或边缘上完成。本文讨论了一种容器化应用程序的设计,该应用程序在三种实现中监测物联网设备的温度和湿度:(1)边缘部署的balenicloud;(2)带有EC2实例的Amazon Web Services云;(3)专用的Amazon Web Services IoT服务。实验表明,在资源消耗方面,边缘部署和云部署之间没有显着的性能差异。然而,对于快速且几乎毫不费力的操作,当涉及到基于消息队列遥测传输的无服务器应用程序时,亚马逊网络服务物联网是首选。对于一体化自动化车队管理来说,balenicloud似乎是物联网开发人员的好工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信